HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 4:10 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Commercial parkland fees approved in Austin

Plus: Residential parkland fee to grow 10%

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...-approved.html

Commercial real estate developers in Austin will now be required to pay an additional fee that will go toward funding parks, following a Sept. 15 City Council vote.

Council voted to collect commercial parkland fees for the first time. The members also voted to increase the parkland fee for residential development in the next city budget, but only by 10% instead of doubling it.

It represents a victory for those who want to boost funding for parks in the fast growing city. But the fees had been opposed by those concerned about the high cost of real estate development in Austin — which has fees far outpacing those in Texas' other big cities.

"This introduces a new tool for us to be able to provide quality parks to our community and those who work in our community," Mayor Pro Tem Alison Alter said. "Parkland dedication is an established mechanism under law to be able to account for the impact of development on parkland. This will help commercial developments pay their fair share and allow us, most importantly, to provide critical trail connections to some small spaces that will really enhance our ability to provide that quality parkland that is so important for green space."

The parkland fee will be required for new projects that include offices, retail, industrial or hotel rooms. The fee will also be required for projects that require a change in zoning.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 10:24 PM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
^^

It’s not likely that Austin will ever get on the list of the Top 25 skyscraper cities in the world by volume of numbers. Those are above 150 meters and while Austin has a growing stock of those in its skyline and is making rapid inroads with many larger peer cities in the US, the rest of the world is just building far more and far quicker than we are. Even the cities towards the bottom of that list are all adding skyscrapers like crazy. Only 2 US cities made the worlds Top 25, NYC and Chicago.

Even Miami, Houston, and LA didn’t make the cut.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 4:31 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Will Peter Pan Mini-Golf keep flying in modern Austin?

Longtime business' lease expires in about 18 months

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...in-future.html

From awkward first dates to trips with the grandkids, Peter Pan Mini-Golf has given Austinites affordable entertainment from its perch on a small hill across the river from downtown for nearly 75 years — and its owners say they are in it for the long haul.

A lot of people hope so. It's one of those iconic Austin businesses that would yield a public outcry if it closed. It's rare to have a quirky, bring-your-own-bottle miniature golf course that puts giant T-Rex and Peter Pan statues next to a world-class skyline. It's just the kind of thing a city needs if it's to be known as weird.

But the fate of Peter Pan will be tested soon. The property is caught up in a Neverland of sorts, somewhere between the public and the private sector, and sometime in the next year or so, the future of the business will be in the hands of the stewards of an unlikely government agency. And so far, there's no telling whether Peter Pan will fly in Austin after 2024 — but the owners have high hopes as a clock ticks in the background.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 4:58 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/bast...farm-proposal/

Take a read of the article - and read the whole thing. I don't know much about this project at all. I'm a huge fan of renewable energy and significantly diversifying the grid in lots of ways. However, the property owner quoted in the article was saying that they would cut down a lot of trees for this solar project and that would drastically change the ecological makeup of the area, lead to more flooding, etc. So...I just thought this would be an interesting discussion (and see if anyone knows anything about this project). Cutting down trees in that area for a solar farm does seem silly to me, especially when programs for solar on rooftops are available and could be done more efficiently than is currently available. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 7:07 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/bast...farm-proposal/

Take a read of the article - and read the whole thing. I don't know much about this project at all. I'm a huge fan of renewable energy and significantly diversifying the grid in lots of ways. However, the property owner quoted in the article was saying that they would cut down a lot of trees for this solar project and that would drastically change the ecological makeup of the area, lead to more flooding, etc. So...I just thought this would be an interesting discussion (and see if anyone knows anything about this project). Cutting down trees in that area for a solar farm does seem silly to me, especially when programs for solar on rooftops are available and could be done more efficiently than is currently available. Thoughts?
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt. In fact, you can even reduce runoff with rain garden type infrastructure on the perimeter.


Utility solar is way, way better than rooftop solar. More economies of scale in installation and maintenance, and grid connections. They're also doing 400 MW of batteries, which again works better at utility scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 8:14 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt. In fact, you can even reduce runoff with rain garden type infrastructure on the perimeter.


Utility solar is way, way better than rooftop solar. More economies of scale in installation and maintenance, and grid connections. They're also doing 400 MW of batteries, which again works better at utility scale.
I work with batteries as well but I don't know anything about proper runoff control. Hence the question. However, we also want to keep trees...so I'm all for having grid-level solar farms, but is this the best location for it in our area? I suppose there would be a cost/benefit for any location, anywhere. I'm genuinely asking these questions out of curiosity - no agenda here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 11:07 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt.
you are implying that the water storage capability in grass and its roots systems is equivalent to that of trees?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 11:53 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonewolf View Post
you are implying that the water storage capability in grass and its roots systems is equivalent to that of trees?
Pretty similar, especially when properly designed and managed.

Trees on the other hand can actually make flooding worse, if limbs and debris fill or obstruct streams and creeks. That’s why Austin actually actively clears such from creeks to help prevent flooding.
I’m guessing the current unused, unincorporated land doesn’t have much active management
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 5:57 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
property owner is 100% correct
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 8:50 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Forecast shows Austin-area population could surpass San Antonio by 2040

https://austin.culturemap.com/news/c...orecast-shows/

No one can gaze into a crystal ball and tell us what the population of the Austin metro area will be two decades from now. Forecasts from professional prognosticators give us a pretty good idea, though.
A CultureMap analysis of the most recent population projections from the Texas Water Development Board, a government agency that helps manage the state’s water supply, shows the Austin area may enter eye-popping territory by 2040. The analysis indicates the population of the Austin metro area will exceed the population of the now-larger San Antonio metro area in just 18 years.
Based on the water board’s county-by-county outlook for Texas, the population of the five-county Austin area will reach 3,340,450 in 2040. By comparison, the population of the eight-county San Antonio area will hit 3,285,451 in 2040, according to the outlook. Some officials, including Austin Mayor Steve Adler, believe the Austin and San Antonio areas are merging into a “metroplex” like Dallas-Fort Worth.
To put these numbers into perspective, the current population of Southern California’s San Diego metro area is around 3.3 million, making it the 17th largest metro in the country. Today, San Antonio ranks as 24th largest U.S. metro, with Austin four spots behind at No. 28.
Adam Perdue, a research economist at Texas A&M University’s Texas Real Estate Research Center, says the prediction that the Austin area’s population will overtake the San Antonio area’s population by 2040 is “reasonable.”
“Austin’s population growth for the last three decades has been much swifter than San Antonio’s. The thing that makes this forecasting difficult is that San Antonio’s growth has been somewhat stable while Austin’s higher growth rate is moderating,” Perdue says.
Perdue questions whether the Austin metro can sustain its higher growth rate, given its “current growing pains.” However, he says, the Austin metro has been outperforming the state’s other major metros over the past two years in terms of housing permits issued per capita. This housing growth “bodes well” for the Austin-surpassing-San Antonio scenario, he notes.
The water board’s forecast shows the San Antonio area will still be larger than the Austin area in 2030 — 2,928,335 residents vs. 2,814,237. But by 2040, the two regions will switch positions, according to the board’s projections. At that point, Austin would be the state’s third largest metro area, and San Antonio would sit at No. 4.
Dallas-Fort Worth ranks as the state’s largest metro and should remain in that position for decades to come. The Houston area almost certainly will remain the state’s second largest metro in the near and distant future.
As of 2021, the population of the San Antonio area was estimated at 2,601,788, compared with 2,352,426 for the Austin area. If the water board’s predictions come true, that population gap would narrow in 2030, and Austin would leapfrog San Antonio in 2040.
In 2050, 2060, and 2070, the population divide between the Austin and San Antonio areas should widen, according to the water board’s numbers. The agency envisions the population of the Austin area climbing past 5 million in 2070 (5,088,247, to be precise), compared with 4,253,684 for San Antonio.
These numbers don’t account for the possibility that the federal government will add counties to the Austin metro area or San Antonio metro area based on updated U.S. Census Bureau head counts.
The federal government defines a metro area as “a core area containing a substantial population nucleus, together with adjacent communities having a high degree of economic and social integration with that core.” So, if the federal government determined a county that’s now outside the Austin or San Antonio metro area had become more economically and socially integrated, it could attach that county to what’s currently the five-county Austin area or the eight-county San Antonio area.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2022, 3:08 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...-year-history/
Quote:
UT Tower to be upgraded for first time in its 85-year history

by: Abigail Jones
Posted: Sep 20, 2022 / 09:05 PM CDT
Updated: Sep 20, 2022 / 09:05 PM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) — University of Texas President Jay Hartzell gave the annual State of The University Address Tuesday afternoon. He talked about record-breaking enrollment, but something that’s also record-breaking is planned renovation for the UT Tower.

It’ll be the first time in the tower’s 85-year history that it’s upgraded.

Hartzell said an announcement is expected to come from Chairman Kevin Eltife and the UT System Board of Regents about a future restoration and renovation project on the Tower.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2022, 10:21 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
https://imgur.com/gallery/Dgj2na4

This is really cool.
__________________
UnitedStateser

Last edited by kingkirbythe....; Sep 24, 2022 at 3:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 1:30 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
Skyscrapers over 500+ feet

Miami: 66 (60 built | +6 u/c)
Houston: 37 (35 built | +2 u/c)
Los Angeles: 31 (27 built | +4 u/c)
San Francisco 25 (25 built | 0 u/c)
Boston: 23 (20 built | +3 u/c)
Seattle: 21 (20 built | 0 u/c)
Dallas: 20 (20 built | 0 u/c)
Atlanta: 19 (19 built | 0 u/c)
Austin: 18 (9 built | +9 u/c)
Las Vegas: 15 (15 built | 0 u/c)
Philly: 15 (13 built | +2 u/c)
Pittsburgh: 11 (11 built | 0 u/c)
Minneapolis: 10 (9 built | +1 u/c)
Detroit: 9 (8 built | +1 u/c)
Charlotte: 8 (7 built | +1 u/c)
Denver: 8 (8 built | 0 u/c)
Baltimore: 4 (4 built | 0 u/c)
Portland: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c)
St. Louis: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c)
San Diego: 1 (1 built | 0 u/c)

By the end of this decade in 2029 Austin will either be between Houston and LA or between Miami and Houston on this list. And all of Austin’s 500 footers will be in downtown or directly adjacent neighborhoods.

Last edited by N90; Sep 28, 2022 at 1:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 2:58 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
Over 500' in Austin (as of today):

9 = T/O or Complete
10 = Site Prep or U/C
11 = Proposed, Site Plan Under Review, or Approved


Plus, there are these projects which should be over 500' (not included in the numbers above):
-3rd & Congress
-ATX Tower East
-ATX Tower West
-99 Red River
-309 E. 3rd


So, right now, again, Austin has 19 towers of 500'+ (9 complete + 10 in the construction phase). There is a chance a few more could get underway in the coming months.

And, if all of the above are counted and completed - that's 35 towers of 500'+ (as of what is public knowledge today).
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*

Last edited by GoldenBoot; Sep 28, 2022 at 6:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 3:04 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
That would certainly move us up that list. The question that I don't have time to research is how many proposals do other cities have?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 3:22 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
That would certainly move us up that list. The question that I don't have time to research is how many proposals do other cities have?
I wouldn’t be surprised if Miami and New York are the only U.S cities with more proposed/approved above 500’.

Edit: There’s more above 500’ under construction than Chicago.
__________________
HAIF

Last edited by Urbannizer; Sep 28, 2022 at 3:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 3:33 PM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
I think it stands to logic and reason that Austin (18) will easily surpass Atlanta (19), Dallas (20), Seattle (21), Boston (23), and San Francisco (25) by 2026 when the current wave either u/c or the wave about to start construction are all complete. LA (31) and then Houston (37) will both be passed by Austin likely around 2030, in Houston’s case maybe a little later around 2033 or something.

That’ll then only leave Miami (66), Chicago, and NYC ahead of Austin after that point but the gaps between Austin and these cities are much wider, though slowly narrowing but still huge gaps that we likely won’t ever see close.

I still have to pinch myself that we’ve already passed Philly (15)!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 3:38 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
I think it stands to logic and reason that Austin (18) will easily surpass Atlanta (19), Dallas (20), Seattle (21), Boston (23), and San Francisco (25) by 2026 when the current wave either u/c or the wave about to start construction are all complete. LA (31) and then Houston (37) will both be passed by Austin likely around 2030, in Houston’s case maybe a little later around 2033 or something.

That’ll then only leave Miami (66), Chicago, and NYC ahead of Austin after that point but the gaps between Austin and these cities are much wider, though slowly narrowing but still huge gaps that we likely won’t ever see close.
the possibility that Austin will have a top 4/5 skyline in the US, in the next 10 years, is MIND blowing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 7:29 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancore View Post
the possibility that Austin will have a top 4/5 skyline in the US, in the next 10 years, is MIND blowing.
And it's going to be interesting, too! We have all kinds of weird shapes and patterns in the pipeline. I mean, we're all going to get our fill of blue glass, too, for sure. But no one will have a supertall like ours, hands down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2022, 12:50 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
A Legendary 100-Year-Old Carousel Will Spin Again in Austin

The ride greeted families at Playland Park in San Antonio before it was disbanded and sold. Now an Austin entrepreneur is putting it back together again.

https://www.texasmonthly.com/style/c...k-san-antonio/


At Playland Park in San Antonio, the carousel was always spinning. Even if there were no passengers, owner Jimmy Johnson instructed the operator to keep it whirling. It had four technicolor wooden horses to a row, 52 jumpers in all. Built as a traveling carousel, it could be broken down and packed away on wagons every night as the carnival moved from town to town. But from 1943 to 1980, the carousel didn’t budge from its spot at the front of the park on the corner of Broadway and Alamo. Chances were, as Johnson knew, any kid walking past would see the ornate features in action and insist on at least one go-round.

Zip Zepeda, now 81, fell for the marketing ploy every time. Each time he entered the gates as a boy, he had to visit the carousel first. As he went in circles, he studied the craftsmanship. “I used to be fascinated,” Zepeda says. “I couldn’t figure out how they made the horses.”

No one has taken a twirl on the Playland Park carousel in Texas since the summer ended 42 years ago, but the carousel itself has been on quite a ride. It briefly left the state, came back, was auctioned in pieces, and spent years in storage. Now an Austin entrepreneur plans to make it the centerpiece of a new venue in town.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.