HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


    Capital Pointe in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Regina Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2861  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 7:23 PM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
The City expressly said they could do this but they said there is no safety issue at this time.
I suspect with some dedicated attention, they'd be able to spot a safety issue or two in fairly short order

I recall a 20' section of the fence along Vic either fell into the pit, or was removed/replaced with a series of 42" jersey barriers. Doubt that met requirements. Took about 4-5days to get a proper fence back up.

I think they just need to focus on safety & they'll quickly find issues.
__________________
@drofmab
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2862  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2018, 5:17 AM
blacktrojan3921's Avatar
blacktrojan3921 blacktrojan3921 is offline
Regina rhymes with fun!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 890
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
Prohibited under provincial law
Let me guess; this law was passed in the last decade or so?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2863  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2018, 3:21 PM
Pi3141592654 Pi3141592654 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 35
https://www.newswire.ca/news-release...672327543.html

Reminds consumers about the risks of syndicated mortgage investments
TORONTO, Feb. 2, 2018 /CNW/ - The Superintendent of Financial Services has issued orders (linked below) following a complex and detailed investigation by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO). The orders were issued, pursuant to a settlement, against eight parties that were involved with syndicated mortgage investments for real estate development projects in Ontario and elsewhere in Canada for which Fortress Real Developments Inc. was a developer or development consultant. (Fortress Real Developments Inc. is not a mortgage brokerage or administrator and is not a party to the settlement or the subject of any of the orders.)

The orders provide that the following four brokerages will pay a combined total of $1.1 million in administrative monetary penalties on consent:
Building Development and Mortgages Canada Inc., formerly known by the name Centro Mortgage Inc.
FFM Capital Inc.
FMP Mortgage Investments Inc.
FDS Broker Services Inc.
The orders also provide that the mortgage brokerage or broker licences of the following, as applicable, are revoked on consent, requiring them to stop all mortgage brokering business immediately:
Building Development and Mortgages Canada Inc.
Vince Petrozza
Rosalia Spadafora
Michael Daramola
Glenn May-Anderson
Ildina Galati-Ferrante, Principal Broker of Building Development and Mortgages Canada Inc. (BDMC), has surrendered her broker licence, requiring her to cease all mortgage brokering activities.
In addition, the mortgage administrator for these syndicated mortgage investments, BDMC, has voluntarily agreed that its mortgage administration functions for existing syndicated mortgage investments in real estate development projects for which Fortress Real Development Inc. is a developer or development consultant will be managed by a new arms-length administrator, FAAN Mortgage Administrators Inc., which will conduct business in BDMC's name. The new administrator will be in contact with all syndicated mortgage lenders/investors in the coming weeks.
FSCO is committed to protecting consumers in the sectors it regulates, including mortgage brokering. FSCO considers syndicated mortgages investments to be high risk, and notes they may not be suitable for the average lender or investor. Potential lenders or investors, including consumers and retail investors, are strongly encouraged to seek independent financial and legal advice before lending money through, or investing in, a syndicated mortgage. FSCO does not have the authority to offer restitution for any financial losses related to investments or its enforcement actions.
Additional Resources
Read FSCO's helpful tips for consumers on syndicated mortgage investments.
File a complaint about a mortgage broker, agent, brokerage or administrator
See all Enforcement Actions FSCO has taken in the mortgage brokering sector and other regulated sectors
Check FSCO's website for up-to-date information about the licence status of your mortgage broker or agent.
SOURCE Financial Services Commission of Ontario

For further information: For media enquiries only, please contact: Malon Edwards, Financial Services Commission of Ontario, Telephone: 416-590-7536, Toll free: 1-800-668-0128, ext. 7795, Email: malon.edwards@fsco.gov.on.ca
Related Links
www.fsco.gov.on.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2864  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2018, 4:57 AM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,233
CBC posted an article about this fine as well that I found a little easier read.

Ontario securities watchdog orders$1.1M in fines to brokers involved in financing Fortress projects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2865  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 10:01 PM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
Prohibited under provincial law
Again, I'm not a lawyer, but reading the Cities Act and Regulations, I think the City has plenty of room to design system of fees that increases with each renewal/extension.

Section 8(4)(a) and (b) of the Cities Act provide a lot of room for the City to establish & set fees.

The fact the fees need to be cost-recovery may give the impression that the City doesn't have the ability to scale-up fees for multiple renewals/ extensions. I don't buy this.

I have no doubt that a strong & reasonable argument could be made that the cost to administer, regulate, and enforce payment increases the longer a project takes to complete... so too should the permit cost-recovery fees. More renewals = higher permit cost. Why? The City should be devoting more time & attention to projects that are wildly off-schedule (multiple extensions, no progress, safety considerations/inspections increase the longer a project sits dormant), than projects that are on-schedule and routinely satisfy inspections.

This is risk-based compliance monitoring 101 - keep an eye on all projects, but keep a closer eye on projects with multiple risk-factors, including instances of non-compliance.

The Act also includes the authority to design a system of fines for non-compliance with Bylaws... the City's lawyers just need to craft some Bylaws to address situations like Capital Pointe. The Act allows for fines of up to $25,000 (for a corporation) for non-compliance, and then daily fines that aren't constrained by the $25k limit for ongoing non-compliance (so, these fines could scale-up exponentially). Over & above the fines, there's an ability to impose penalties.

I believe the Cities Act provides the City with plenty of options - but they would involve crafting new Bylaws; designing a system of fees; a risk-based inspection & regulation framework; and a system of fines and penalties. More importantly, it would take willpower on the City's part to enforce these.

This all goes back to my previous comment -
There comes a time when either more aggressive action is needed.
When that time is? Not sure (a decade seems too long, at a gut level).
What the action is? Also not sure (throwing our hands up & accepting that we're powerless doesn't seem reasonable)
__________________
@drofmab
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2866  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 5:50 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,089
Just the facts.

Capital Pointe completion date pushed back another year

Quote:
Originally Posted by theArticle
Spokesperson says there's been a number of "excusable" delays for project
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2867  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 6:48 PM
ceedub1170's Avatar
ceedub1170 ceedub1170 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina
Posts: 445
SWEET! I can't wait to see it in 2020! :-)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2868  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 9:19 PM
James Gablan James Gablan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
I don't understand why the city can't force them to clear the side walks and street space.

Would not threatening to take back the public space force them into either building the building or filling in the hole?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2869  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 10:38 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Gablan View Post
I don't understand why the city can't force them to clear the side walks and street space.
Presumably the site permit for Capital Pit allows them to block the sidewalks and street space.

"The developer has until March 2018 to achieve "meaningful construction" on the site, before its latest foundation and site permit expires."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2870  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 10:59 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedub1170 View Post
SWEET! I can't wait to see it in 2020! :-)
Have a look now. This is the 2020 look.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2871  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2018, 7:21 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,089
^Lol.

"See the future now!"
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2872  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 2:23 PM
Pi3141592654 Pi3141592654 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 35
http://leaderpost.com/news/local-new...capital-pointe

The Capital Pointe project has built up a mountain of outstanding bills and postponed mortgages, prompting one contractor to wonder if he’ll ever get paid.

Seamus Carroll, president of CLC Building Solutions, said his company stopped excavation work at the site last summer. He was frustrated. According to his telling, developers behind the long-delayed tower at the corner of Albert Street and Victoria Avenue had failed to settle hundreds of thousands in outstanding bills.

He said they still haven’t made good.

“It doesn’t help to be out that kind of money. It’s very hard to keep going,” Carroll said. “We have employees to pay and equipment to run and maintain.”

CLC put a lien against the property last month, and was soon joined by two other firms. Land title documents show a total of $986,405 in outstanding claims from contractors. Asked about his level of optimism at ever seeing the money, Carroll was blunt: “low.”

But Fortress Real Developments, the company leading the project, called Caroll’s comments and figures “grossly inaccurate.” The company’s development team prepared a series of statements that a press representative relayed in a series of emails to the Leader-Post over several days.

“Anyone can register a lien on a project,” one email read. “That does NOT mean the monies are owed to them. This matter will be resolved through a process that is set out in the Saskatchewan Lien Act. As often times, liens are filed erroneously and improvidently, we believe this is the case here and we intend to defend our position.”

According to City Hall, Capital Pointe had, as of late February, also racked up the second-highest bill for late property taxes in Regina. A notice displayed at city hall last month showed the property had amassed $49,502 in tax arrears. Given the value of the land, however, the figure could have been accumulated over a single year.

Coun. Bob Hawkins, who has long expressed frustration over the “big hole” left by excavation, advised the developers to pay up.

“Like any property owner, they’re obligated to pay their taxes,” he said. “And the city can take action if they don’t.”

“How do they rationalize not paying taxes?” asked Coun. Andrew Stevens, whose ward encompasses the site.

Fortress did not respond to repeated emailed questions about when they plan to pay their taxes or if they’ve been paid since the notice was issued.

The Capital Pointe project, a hotel and condo development, first came before the city’s planning commission in September 2009 under the name “Westgate Plaza.” Construction was to start a year later, with completion slated for November 2012. The current 27-storey plan, which would become Regina’s tallest building, was unveiled in 2010. Fortress took it over in 2014.

But the developers have long struggled with building challenges and a cooling market for condos in Regina. First came trouble with electrical infrastructure, then with a sanitation line and debris from the old Plains Hotel, said Fortress.

“The housing market conditions have definitely created challenges for this development,” an email from the company read. “We have not sold all the units.”

It called the repeated delays “excusable.”

Robert MacKay, a Regina-based real estate lawyer, said all signs point to financial difficulties with the project, given the liens, although those aren’t unusual in the construction industry.

All told, the Capital Pointe property is carrying $43 million in mortgages, with 24 separate postponements on record. MacKay said postponements can be a way of reordering the priority of debt to raise new financing.

He also commented on another legal point about Capital Pointe: The company that officially owns the site, Westgate Properties, wasn’t an active corporation as of last week. It was listed as “struck off” the corporate registry. From a strictly legal perspective, that means it could not carry on business.

“If I bought a unit there now, I can’t own it, because they’re not in a legal position to actually be able to transfer me the property,” MacKay said on Friday.

He added that the issue is largely a technicality. And Fortress, which is a major shareholder in Westgate, told the Leader-Post on Monday the registry problem resulted from an “oversight” and has now been resolved.

Fortress said it has already paid $1.2 million to the city in permits, taxes and fees. It stressed that it is still committed to finishing the project and repaying its debts.

“We have never contemplated not constructing the building,” the company’s email read.

“All projects deal with mortgages, disputes that may result in liens, and at times tax arrears,” it continued. “We fully intend to make sure all the items are dealt with as we move to the next phases of construction.”

To get there, Capital Pointe must first surmount a major bureaucratic hurdle on March 15. If the developers can’t show “meaningful construction work” by that date, city hall can declare the current building permit expired.

That’s up to administration, not council. But Hawkins said he hasn’t seen anything to convince him there’s been meaningful progress.

“What I’m hoping to see is some activity indicating that the project is moving forward,” he said. “It’s no more complicated than that. There’s a feeling that nothing is happening.”

Fortress argues that foundation work has taken place, pointing to progress on forming and shoring the excavation site. That work is 97 per cent complete, according to the company, which says it’s preparation for pouring concrete.

“Major works will begin once weather permits,” the email stated.

Fortress now says the tower will be built within 18 to 24 months. It’s far from the first new completion date provided for Capital Pointe. And Coun. Stevens is skeptical.

“They expect to have the project done in two years, every two years,” he said.

awhite-crummey@postmedia.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2873  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 3:35 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,516
Wow.....what else can one say about this joke....except it is NOT funny....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2874  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 3:43 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pi3141592654 View Post
The Capital Pointe project has built up a mountain of outstanding bills and postponed mortgages, prompting one contractor to wonder if he’ll ever get paid.
Narrator: He won't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2875  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 4:16 PM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Poor Regina. So glad Winnipeg wisened up to these crooks before SkyCity Centre broke ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2876  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 4:30 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,089
On the positive side, the backtaxes might give the city the power to take the land back. Although the owner could then pay the taxes within the rather long period of time to reclaim ownership.

__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2877  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 4:34 AM
pappcam pappcam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 628
Seems like a good place to put all the snow from this weather bomb we just had.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2878  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 5:57 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by prairieguy View Post
Wow.....what else can one say about this joke....except it is NOT funny....
I know I shouldn't have, but I laughed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2879  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 7:46 PM
tele75's Avatar
tele75 tele75 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sherwood Park/Edmonton
Posts: 251
Question for someone with more knowledge than myself. Is it possible for another serious, financially sound developer to acquire the site under these circumstances?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2880  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 8:06 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,089
^The short answer is yes.

Fortress could sell the land ot the city could do a tax sale of the land because of taxes in arrears.

Of course a tax sale would mean that Fortress could still claim ownership of the land if they pay the taxes within some timeframe, usually six months to a year, but I don't know the city or provincial laws on that.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.