HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2026, 12:53 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
The graphic is really odd because about half of the blue area around Rupert-Renfrew are all CD-1 zones, and classified as Employment, not industrial at all
Isn't that because historically (before Metro's new designations of industrial and mixed employment), the City allowed some big box retail within their industrial lands, through a rezoning, so the 2013 ODP reflects that reality?
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2026, 1:58 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
No, it's the other way round. If you look at Map 1 on page 10 of Vancouver’s Regional Context Statement Official Development Plan, , you can see that some of the industrial areas are designated 'industrial', and smaller parts (near transit, lighter blue), are designated as 'mixed employment'. Those are the areas where some residential might be contemplated, with commercial and industrial space also being provided. The 'industrial' parts don't have any basis for anything other than employment space, so something like Three-sixty on West 2nd where residential is proposed in the Mount Pleasant industrial area doesn't have any basis for approval by the City, unless Metro Vancouver's board agree that there's some reason to allow it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
They're separate under Metro Vancouver's designations, this is where this "200m rule" comes from, while CoV designates both as industrial under various different zoning schedules as shown in that map.

Here is Metro Vancouver's map: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/in...&layers=e9b6186de5ed4cc3ac74902d7ce96297
Perfect. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2026, 11:05 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
The graphic is really odd because about half of the blue area around Rupert-Renfrew are all CD-1 zones, and classified as Employment, not industrial at all
The CD-1s could be for Broadway Tech Park, the LaSalle College and the other tech oriented office buildings there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2026, 1:11 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The CD-1s could be for Broadway Tech Park, the LaSalle College and the other tech oriented office buildings there.
Yup! Just noting that they're not technically zoned for "I" or "M" and in the "Employment Zone".

I know I'm being nit-picky, but this is COV nit-picky stuff to be serious about when your planning this, communicating it to the Public and Council .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2026, 11:47 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
Here's the report from the City Manager:

https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/2025-12-1...ll-potential-of-exceptional-sites-in.pdf

All the exceptional sites will report back Q1 2027. The sites near Main/Terminal is Q4. And Quantum Park discussions continue with Concord Pacific so that rezoning report is TBD.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2026, 11:52 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Yup! Just noting that they're not technically zoned for "I" or "M" and in the "Employment Zone".

I know I'm being nit-picky, but this is COV nit-picky stuff to be serious about when your planning this, communicating it to the Public and Council .
Doesn't the CD-1 attached to those sites limit the uses to the same as "I" or "M" zones, making them effectively the same? (And I suspect the CD-1 also limits the density to what has been developed - which is probably less than they could have today).
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2026, 2:14 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
Broadway Tech Park.
The CD-1 allows a bit more General Office use than I-3.

Quote:
PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

This report assesses an application to rezone the site at 2900 East Broadway from I-3 Industrial District to CD-1 Comprehensive Development District to:

• increase the maximum permitted floor area for General Office Use from 33.33 percent of the total developed floor area to 1.0 FSR (floor space ratio); and
• increase the maximum permitted floor area for Retail Use from 1 000 m² (10,763.9 sq. ft.) to 2 000 m² (21,527.8 sq. ft.);
• provide for a 700 m² (7,534.7 sq. ft.) restaurant to be located in the southwest corner of the site; and
• retain other provisions of the I-3 District Schedule in the CD-1 including permitted land uses and maximum permitted height.

The applicant states that the requested zoning changes would respond to market demand for General Office space and complete the second phase of the Broadway Tech Centre which has been stalled for several years. Phase II would involve the conversion and re-use of the former Eaton’s warehouse creating an environmental benefit, and better utilization of the adjacent Skytrain station through the provision of additional employment opportunities at the Broadway Tech Centre.

In November, 2006 staff reported this CD-1 application to Council for advice, noting a similar proposal involving all I-3 zoned lands was refused by Council in November 2004. Council instructed staff to continue processing the CD-1 application.

Staff recommend that the CD-1 application be referred to a Public Hearing and approved, subject to conditions.
...
Background:

In March, 1995 City Council adopted the Industrial Lands Policies which seeks to retain most of the city’s existing industrial land base for industry and service businesses in order to meet the needs of the city-serving, city-oriented and port/river-related industry. Council also approved a work program for updating industrial district schedules to reflect the needs of contemporary industry and service businesses.

In July, 1999 Council enacted the I-3 zoning district schedule to permit high-technology industry and businesses with significant research and development activity, such as software developers, and biotechnology companies. Such firms generally have space requirements and worker densities similar to conventional office uses. To encourage transit use and ease traffic impacts, only industrial sites well served by rapid transit are considered suitable for I-3 zoning. Two properties have developed under I-3 zoning: “Vantech Centre” on Terminal Avenue and “Broadway Tech Centre” on the subject site.

In November, 2004 to provide more flexibility in the I-3 zone for uses that provide business support or back office services, the Director of Planning initiated a text amendment to the I-3 zoning recommending an increase in the amount of General Office Use from 33.33 percent of the total developed floor area to 1.0 FSR of the total allowable 3.0 FSR in the I-3 zone. Council chose not to refer the item to a Public Hearing citing concerns for impacts on other current and future sites zoned I-3 and additional incremental impacts on the supply of space for industrial uses.

In June, 2006 a CD-1 rezoning application was received proposing to increase the amount of General Office Use from 33.33 percent of the total developed floor area to 1.0 FSR and increase the amount of Retail Use from 1 000 m² (10,763.9 sq. ft.) to 2 000 m² (21,527.8 sq. ft.). In November, 2006 staff sought Council direction on whether to continue processing the application or refuse it. Council instructed staff to continue processing the Vancouver City Council 4 CD-1 Rezoning - 2900 East Broadway application. This application is similar to the proposal considered by Council in November 2006.
https://council.vancouver.ca/20070724/documents/p1.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2026, 2:53 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Broadway Tech Park.
The CD-1 allows a bit more General Office use than I-3.
The CD-1 allowed a bit more General Office use than I-3 when it was approved in 2007. Today the remaining I-3 zoned land (in False Creek Flats) allows potentially greater General Office density.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2026, 4:35 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
Got it, so they've relaxed I-3 since then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2026, 8:50 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,380
what happened to Frameworks 1221 East 2nd Ave ??

https://www.avisonyoung.ca/properties/1221-east-2nd-avenue-vancouver-frameworks-sale


last year the developer said and I quote

alliancepartners
48w
"Construction on Frameworks is set to begin soon! This exciting new development will redefine the modern workspace, combining striking design with innovative functionality to create a one-of-a-kind environment for businesses."


>>


https://www.instagram.com/p/DGBGFYIJnod/
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2026, 10:25 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,998
They've had a building permit issued for a year and half, it's strata so they're presumably waiting for enough units to sell.
Last year they submitted an updated development permit to reduce the height of each floor by 1 or 2 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2026, 5:48 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
They seem to be doing pretty well on selling the units. I think there was a 2 year construction/completion timeline when they launched the project.

https://cdn.sharplaunch.com/v2/client-10...icing__Availabilities_Sheet_1.6.2026.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.