HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 11, 2010, 9:02 AM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Looks like we could easily increase the lot levy to even out with other municipalities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 11, 2010, 2:49 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Well there you go. Personally I think we could boost it even more without much of an effect.

Developers fee freeze to cost city $9 million
May 11, 2010
Emma Reilly
Hamilton Spectator
A 12-month freeze on development charges will cost the city almost $9 million in lost revenue by the time it ends.

The freeze -- put in place last July to help ease the effects of the recession -- forced the city to postpone $3.5 million worth of infrastructure projects in 2009, including construction on Rymal Road, Regional Road 56 and Highland Road. It will also force the city to delay up to $6.5 million worth of projects in 2010.

"The longer we do this, the worse the city of Hamilton is going to be, " said Councillor Brad Clark.

Council voted yesterday to lift the freeze and raise the development fee to build a new house from $19,573 to $26,689, despite resistance from local home builders.

Bernice Flegg, president of the Hamilton-Halton Home Builders' Association, told council the economy wasn't yet strong enough to hike development charges.

Flegg also warned rising interest rates and the implementation of the harmonized sales tax will unsettle an industry already blindsided by the recession.

But Clark took aim at the home builders, arguing interest rates are at an all-time low and the HST won't apply to homes under $400,000, which includes most of the houses built in Hamilton.

"I'm a little bit frustrated by the Hamilton-Halton Home Builders' Association's position here, " he said. "I don't have any indicators before me showing the economy is getting worse."

Development charges are intended to cover the cost of new infrastructure -- such as roads and sewers -- that are needed to support new growth. If the fees don't cover enough of those costs, taxpayers are left to pick up the tab.

City staff reported yesterday building permits climbed 25 per cent in the first three months of 2010. Home sales in Hamilton and Burlington were also up 38 per cent over the same period last year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 13, 2010, 8:01 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
In today's Spec:

Quote:
Council stands by building fee hike
The Hamilton Spectator

(May 13, 2010)
Local homebuilders have lost the fight against rising development charges.

Council last night endorsed lifting the year-long development fee freeze that will leave an $8.7 million dent in the city's revenues by the time it ends.

Residential development fees, currently frozen at just over $19,500, are to increase to around $26,600 on July 6.

Developers had lobbied the city to implement half of the fee hike in July and wait until Jan. 1, 2011 to complete the increase. They argued a fragile economy, the incoming HST, and rising interest rates mean their businesses aren't yet ready to bear the total brunt of the hike.

Spokespeople for the local development industry were disappointed by council's decision, but not surprised. They believed the fix was in as they only found out about the move less than a week ago.

"We're supposed to have a relationship of inclusion, where we liaise between the municipality and ourselves when it comes to this kind of decision, but we were not given that opportunity," said Losani Homes CEO Fred Losani.

Losani and Douglas Duke, executive director of the Hamilton-Halton Home Builders Association, said the increase will lead to the delay of some projects and the loss of construction jobs this year.

"This has been a lightning-fast process," said Dukes. "I think something stinks."

Only Councillor Tom Jackson sided with the developers during the vote.

"I think there's still some fragility and volatility out there," he said.

"Just an easing of the transition before these development charges were implemented would be appreciated."

Developers had originally hoped to convince council to extend the development charge freeze, but ended up lobbying for a phase-in.

Losani said councillors don't appear to understand how development fees work. The city's position "is biasedly based on an inaccurate interpretation of what this fund is for."

He said development charges are intended to pay for growth-related infrastructure.

"For every home that is built tomorrow, the homebuyer pays the DC (development charge). Any growth that's required to accommodate that homebuyer, that's what that money is intended to work for," Losani said.

"It's not intended to upgrade a street that has, over the past 20 years, become incapable of handling the population that was added over the past 20 years -- that becomes the responsibility of every taxpayer."

Losani said housing starts are up this year over 2009 but, compared to 2008, they remain down 12 per cent. He said this year's home building surge is artificially driven by the coming harmonized sales tax, the threat of increases in interest rates and commodity pricing. Losani noted lumber pricing is 75 per cent higher than current contract pricing.

City staff told council the fee freeze led to a loss of almost $9 million in revenue. To prevent a budget hit, the city delayed projects adding up to the same amount.

Finance chief Rob Rossini said the city knows the purpose of development charges, which is to pay for servicing new development. Upgrades to existing roads aren't paid for by development charges, he said.

Rossini said freezing the development charges for a year was enough.

"Are things perfect today? No, but other municipalities have moved ahead and we can't not collect full-cost recovery for long periods of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 13, 2010, 9:43 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
About damn time.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 13, 2010, 10:56 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt602 View Post
About damn time.
...and a long time coming. Some might say too long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 20, 2010, 12:32 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Hamilton and Brantford Housing Starts to Rise in 2010
http://www.marketwire.com/press-rele...10-1263619.htm

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - May 19, 2010) - New home starts will increase moderately in 2010 as compared to a year ago, according to the Spring Housing Market Outlook report for the Hamilton and Brantford Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) released today by CMHC. Reports are also available for all major metropolitan centres across the country.

Highlights of the report include:

•MLS® sales will reach 13,600 units in the Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) and 1,950 in the Brantford CMA. Rising mortgage rates will slow down the pace of sales and prices through the end of 2010 and into 2011. The average price for an existing home will increase to $315,000 and $229,000 in Hamilton and Brantford, respectively.

•Starts will reach close to 3,000 units in the Hamilton CMA and just over 400 in the Brantford CMA. Land availability and higher prices for new homes will shift some building activity towards townhouses and apartments in Hamilton. In Brantford, the escalating prices for new single-detached homes may shift housing demand towards the relatively less expensive resale market.

•Continuing investments into growing sectors in the Hamilton CMA will put more people into jobs and reduce the unemployment rate to 8.1 per cent in 2010. In the Brantford CMA, employment will hold steady through 2010 before improving in 2011.

"Both the new home and resale markets will recover moderately this year," said Sarah Fong, CMHC's Senior Market Analyst for Hamilton and Brantford. "Construction in the new home market will shift towards higher density, lower-priced homes such as townhouses and will continue to face competition from the well-supplied resale market." added Fong.

"Higher mortgage carrying costs, increasing supply pressures and declining first time buyer demand will temper Ontario housing activity later this year and into 2011," said Ted Tsiakopoulos, CMHC's Ontario regional economist "This transition in housing activity should be orderly thanks to improving job markets, historically low interest rates and further gains in household incomes," added Tsiakopoulos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 11:18 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Hamilton housing starts up but numbers down nationally

June 09, 2010
The Canadian Press
TORONTO
http://www.thespec.com/News/Business/article/784780

Hamilton's new home construction activity bucked a national drop in May.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. reported yesterday the country's annual rate of housing starts fell last month, pegging the rate at 189,100 units in May, down from a revised 201,800 in April.

But the Grimsby-Hamilton-Burlington region posted 284 starts in May, up 134 per cent from 121 in the same month last year. Year-to-date figures show 1,569 starts, up 103 per cent from 771 for the first part of 2009.

Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist at the Bank of Montreal, said May's national figures were below expectations but "hardly a shock." Economists have widely predicted a slowdown in the white-hot housing market in the second half of 2010.

Many consumers pushed sales through to get into the market ahead of tougher mortgage rules in April, expected interest rate hikes and the July 1 implementation of the HST in Ontario and British Columbia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 3:06 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
I would assume Hamilton's exception to the downward trend in housing starts is at least partly being propped up by developers rushing to get houses in the ground before the development fee increase come July. It'll be interesting to see how Hamilton's August starts compare to the national average.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 10:52 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
New housing starts heat up locally, slow nationally

August 11, 2010
Steve Arnold
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/News/Business/article/823989

Hamilton's new housing market continues to outperform the rest of the country.

Data released yesterday by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation show the number of new homes started in the Grimsby-Hamilton-Burlington area in July has returned to pre-recession levels.

Starts were up 33 per cent across the region in July compared with June and 90 per cent compared with July 2009. Hamilton itself showed an increase of 44.3 per cent over the previous month and 163 per cent over the year.

Nationally, housing starts were down 1.6 per cent over June.

TD Bank economist Dina Cover noted the national number shows the lowest level of home building activity since the start of the year.

"Existing home sales have been trending down since the start of this year -- with the decline accelerating in May (through) July -- while prices have been losing modest ground since May," she wrote in a report. "In turn, lower home prices have dampened the incentive for home building. With prices expected to slide a bit further, fewer home starts are likely to hit ground."

Cover also warned the slowing housing market could become a drag on Canada's economic recovery in the third quarter.

Locally, growth in the industry was driven by starts of single family homes, although starts of all types were also up.

A separate report from Statistics Canada shows the prices of those new homes continued to rise in June. The agency's New Housing Price Index for Hamilton rose 2.6 per cent over June 2009 to 153.2 from 149.3.

That means a house that sold for $100,000 in 1997 was worth $149,300 in June 2009 and $153,200 this year. The month-over-month increase was flat at 0.1 per cent.

Hamilton's price growth compared with May 2010 matched the national number while its year-over-year change trailed the Canadian figure of 3.3 per cent.

Canada's cooling market reflects the trend in the rest of world, noted Adrienne Warren, senior economist at Scotia Economics: "The recent slowdown has been most dramatic in Canada. Sales, while still at a high level, have trended steadily lower alongside reduced affordability and exhausted pent-up demand."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 3:03 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Hmmm, Hamilton looks like it is healthily outperforming Burlington, even with the HST.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 6:58 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is online now
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
Hmmm, Hamilton looks like it is healthily outperforming Burlington, even with the HST.
Possibly fueled by the giant new housing developments on the East Mountain? I also don't think Burlington has very much room left for single family homes. Waterdown is where it's at now.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 2:41 AM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
Possibly fueled by the giant new housing developments on the East Mountain? I also don't think Burlington has very much room left for single family homes. Waterdown is where it's at now.
No kidding. I grew up in Glanbrook, but I don't even recognize it anymore. Hwy. 56 is going to need more stoplights soon!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2010, 6:33 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Hamilton CMA housing starts soar

John Burman
http://www.thespec.com/news/local/ar...ng-starts-soar

New homes in Hamilton and apartments in Burlington drove a building frenzy in August the likes of which the local construction industry hasn’t seen in years.

The CMHC says total August starts in the Hamilton Census Market Area – which includes Hamilton, Burlington and Grimsby – were about double the average for the year and the strongest month for starts since 2004, and 112 cent ahead of the same month in 2009.

Builders who spent much of last year finishing what they had on hand in more uncertain economic times, enjoyed better business through the summer of 2010 completing orders customers placed in anticipation of the implementation of the provincial Harmonized Sales Tax July 1 and speculation about rising mortgage rates.

“Some buyers made purchases earlier this year ahead of expected mortgage rate increases, which meant that there were more homes in the pipeline for builders to start on this summer,” Sarah Fong, CMHC’s senior market analyst for Hamilton said a statement with the August data release Thursday.

“Also, after having been more focused on completing and selling off homes rather than

starting on new homes, builders were looking to replenish supply,’ she said.

Across with the exception of Kitchener, London and Windsor, all other centers posted increases from the same month one year ago.

The CMHC says for the year, Ontario new home construction in urban areas is running 33 per cent above levels for the same period one year ago.

“New home starts moved closer to trend levels in August - boosted by strength in modestly price housing construction. Stronger multi-family home construction will continue, thanks to a backlog of high density sales that have not begun construction, more land available for higher density development and higher housing costs,” said Ted Tsiakopoulos, CMHC‘s Regional Economist.

As in the Hamilton CMA. Singled detached home construction had led the recovery in housing starts beginning in the second quarter of last year, said Tsiakopoulos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 10:55 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Hamilton leads the way as new house prices rise in August: Statistics Canada

http://www.thespec.com/news/business...tistics-canada

OTTAWA The New Housing Price Index increased 0.1 per cent in August after a 0.1 per cent decrease in July.

Statistics Canada reports the top contributors to the monthly increase were Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa, along with Montreal.

Prices increased the most in Hamilton (up 0.9 per cent), followed by Windsor and Winnipeg (both up 0.4).

Statistics Canada attributed Hamilton’s increase in part to builders moving to new areas with higher land development fees, while Winnipeg prices rose due to higher lumber and steel costs and in Windsor some builders reported higher operating costs.

Saint John, Fredericton and Moncton, N.B., along with Ottawa, Gatineau, Calgary and Greater Sudbury and Thunder Bay all recorded decreases of 0.1 per cent.

Prices were unchanged in 10 of 21 metropolitan areas in August.

Year over year, the index was up 2.9 per cent in August.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2010, 12:28 AM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Wow Hamilton really pounded Burlington in housing starts this year.

Perfect storm leaves Hamilton awash in construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2011, 12:52 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
http://video.ca.msn.com/watch/video/...40-pm/jvk2ah9w

2011 Real Estate Preview
2010 was a good year for Canadian residential real estate, with double digit gains early in the year, then tapering to more modest gains in recent months. So what's in store for 2011? BNN speaks to Don Campbell, president, Real Estate Investment Network.

Summed up.....

Over-Achievers
Edmonton
Calgary
Hamilton
K/W

Average
Ottawa
Halifax
Winnipeg
St. John

Under-Achievers
Vancouver
Toronto
Saskatoon
Montreal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2011, 1:39 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,129
You know we're in a massive RE bubble when a dump city like Hamilton, with little jobs and nothing going for it, has housing prices that continue to rise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2011, 11:51 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Well there's always the glass half empty perspective.

http://www.thespec.com/news/business...se-report-says

OTTAWA A new report predicts Canada’s housing market is poised for a collapse and is only waiting for the trigger of rising interest rates expected for later this year — a view that flies in the face of many other forecasts.

Capital Economics calculates Canadian home prices could fall by about 25 per cent — and even as much as 35 per cent — over the next three years once the Bank of Canada begins tightening monetary policy.

Most economists expect the central bank will begin doing just that in late spring or early summer, with the trendsetting rate rising from the current 1 per cent to more than 2 per cent by the end of the year.

And the Bank of Canada is expected to keep hiking the policy rate next year until it returns to normal levels — about 3.5 per cent — by the end of 2012.

That would have profound implications both for home values and the economy, says David Madani, Canadian chief economist of Capital Economics.

“Even small rises in official interest rates have been shown to have a big effect on homeowner confidence in other countries under similar circumstances,” Madani said Thursday. “If the Bank of Canada does resume its monetary tightening this year, this could easily prove to be a tipping point for a house price collapse.”

The knock-on effects of homeowners seeing the value of their biggest asset crash could see consumer confidence and spending plunge, damaging the economy, he added.

And, if prices fall 35 per cent, the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corp. that insures higher-risk mortgages could suffer losses of $10 billion as about 10 per cent of mortgages default.

Capital Economics is not the only, or first, private-sector group that has warned about Canada’s hot housing market, which defied all odds in rebounding strongly while the country was still in recession, thank’s to super-low interest rates.

But, so far, all predictions of doom have been unfulfilled.

The Bank of Canada and the majority of private sector forecasters are instead calling for a “soft landing” in the housing market, where prices flatten or fall at most a few percentage points. That slowdown has already begun in terms of both resales, prices and building permits for new homes.

The CIBC, for one, estimates home prices are inflated by between 5 and 10 per cent at most and judges most homeowners will be able to shoulder modest interest rate increases.

As well, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has stressed he does not believe Canada has a housing bubble, while taking modest steps to tighten rules for mortgage borrowing to prevent one from occurring.

Since 1999, home prices in Canada have risen by 7 per cent each year to about $314,000 — or 125 per cent — using an index that averages resale values of two-storey homes and two-bedroom condos. That puts home prices at about 5.5 times the average disposable income per worker of $58,347, well above the historical average of 3.5 times.

As well, the price ratio of ownership to the cost of renting has almost doubled in 10 years.

Add to those markets that excess supply of new housing units is high by historical norms, and home ownership is already at record levels, and the recipe for a major correction are in place.

The Canadian Press


25 to 35% drop in house prices sounds far fetched. Is it possible, and if so, would Hamilton weather the storm better as it usually does?
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2011, 2:08 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
25-35% what though - average across the country? Or do they mean "as much as 25-35%"

My prediction? rising interest rates will cause large value crashes in areas where houses are clearly way overvalued and where prices rose more quickly. Huge swaths of Toronto and Vancouver for example. More recent sprawl developments where prices go up tens of percent between purchase of house and completion of construction. Tar sands housing frenzy areas.

But established neighbourhoods in medium and smaller cities - or places which did not see the huge rises - would see much less dramatic price drops.

i.e. hamilton.
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2011, 1:41 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
March 8, 2011

CMHC Says Slow Start to the Year

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - March 8, 2011) - Preliminary data released today by CMHC show that there was a decline in home starts in February in the Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), as compared to the same month last year. Total home starts declined by nearly three-quarters to just over 100 starts for the month. The vast majority of the starts were of single-detached homes. They declined by only one-third as compared to a year ago. Single, semi-detached and apartment construction were all down in February, and there was no townhouse construction.



Starts were unusually low during the first two months of this year, particularly in Hamilton and Burlington, after having been unusually high in the first two months of 2010. In Hamilton, there were just over 100 single-detached homes, and 15 townhouses and apartments as compared to over 500 homes of all types during the same period in 2010. In Burlington, a total of 27 single and semi- detached homes were started during January and February, as compared to 10 times that number last year.

"Buyer demand for new housing has declined in recent months following the recovery period in 2010," said Sarah Fong, CMHC's Senior Market Analyst for Hamilton and Brantford. "Also, land scarcity has been an issue in some areas of the CMA," added Fong.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.