HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2741  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 12:28 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,712
Well another big investment on Portage will be coming soon with the development of Portage Place. That will be huge.
     
     
  #2742  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 12:36 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Yeah, I was thinking about that when I wrote my post. But I wasn't sure what to make of a redevelopment of a 33 year old complex that has brutally underachieved relative to expectations for its entire existence. It feels more like fixing something that has been broken for a long time than something new and improved.

Thinking over this Portage Avenue thing, it's generally agreed that the mid/late 90s were kind of the bottoming out period for downtown Winnipeg... things have improved significantly since then. But Portage Avenue specifically is probably worse now than it was then. The real wins (Bell MTS Place, Manitoba Hydro, Centrepoint, Avenue Building renovations) have not generated much of a spillover effect to improve neighbouring blocks, and retail has nearly disappeared during that time... Portage Avenue of 1997 was a better shopping street than it is now. That's not even getting into the social problems that used to be somewhat restricted to a few north Portage haunts but are now fairly widespread in the area.

It's pretty vexing considering how much money and effort has gone into improving Portage over the years. It is just so stubbornly resistant to improvement.
     
     
  #2743  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 1:21 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,667
It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if Chipman was able to acquire the Dayton (edit, i previously said Dreman) Building. I know first hand that he tried hard to get it. Although I actually like the Dayton (edit from Dreman) Building I can't help but think with a better owner, that corner could be more than it has been since...forever. I realize that Chipman would have demolished it, but...
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York

Last edited by Biff; Jun 11, 2020 at 2:06 PM.
     
     
  #2744  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 1:26 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ I don't get the Dreman Building... it's a big parkade fronted by an office (now residential, I suppose) building and CRUs just a stone's throw from Portage and Main. Yet it has also been chronically underachieving for about as long as I've been paying attention, which is about the last 20-odd years or so. I realize it isn't a trophy asset but you'd think it would be doing a bit better than it is. I'm sure the parkade is doing OK but it seems like at any given time multiple floors and CRUs are empty.

But that being said, I don't remember any public news about Chipman trying to get his hands on the Dreman. What did he want to do there? Also, I wonder what stopped him? Hasn't it changed hands a couple of times over the years?
     
     
  #2745  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 1:44 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,667
I actually had a conversation with him where he said he tried, really hard to acquire it (Dayton) as part of the overall CentrePointe development. I believe they really wanted Glasshouse to be right on Portage. He had some strong opinions on what is holding back the area. I think if he could get it he would still buy it to this day.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York

Last edited by Biff; Jun 11, 2020 at 2:07 PM.
     
     
  #2746  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 1:49 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Putting Centrepoint right by Portage and Main would have been interesting. Might have worked out better in the long run... even though it's across the street from Bell MTS Place, it feels like a bit of an orphan located where it is. I can't help but think that Glasshouse would have been more marketable at, say, Portage and Fort than where it is. Quite a different vibe between those two locations.

If he wanted Glasshouse to be right on Portage it's funny that he couldn't swing a deal to get either the Dreman or the Dayton Building.
     
     
  #2747  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 1:50 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,096
Dreman is a really odd building. The floor plates are fairly narrow and deep. Also elevator access is only at the back of the building and shared with the parkade. The overall layout meant typically a single tenant per floor. The overall building footprint is fairly small too which I think works against it. If you toss in not having the best commercial leasing agent and property manager that could explain a lot.

I got a feeling when Chipman was making a play to purchase Dreman it would have been for a similar idea to what we got at True North Square but in a different configuration. If he had Dreman getting the rest of that block likely would not have been a big issue. The former Carlton Club has been on the market for years from my understanding after Fort Garry Hotel landed the deal for the Fort Garry Place ballroom area and expanded there instead of the the Carlton Club. "The White House" seems like a filler tenant, the former bank at Garry is just waiting for someone to do something with it. The low rise next to the Carlton Club would likely sell with a decent offer.

That leaves the two "hotels" CentreVenture would like to see gone, Fame and a parking lot. I am sure if the deal was coming together CentreVenture would have helped to "relocate" those hotels. Being the last one standing on the block, Fame would have found a deal that would work. Keep in mind Chipman has long quietly worked well with the LGBTQ community as the landlord for the bar on Garry St.
     
     
  #2748  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 2:04 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
If he wanted Glasshouse to be right on Portage it's funny that he couldn't swing a deal to get either the Dreman or the Dayton Building.
Shit, I meant the Dayton Building. No wonder I made it confusing. Wow, I really fucked up this conversation.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
     
     
  #2749  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 2:11 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Shit, I meant the Dayton Building. No wonder I made it confusing. Wow, I really fucked up this conversation.
Haha...OK, makes way more sense now. I guess the Dayton Building's owner figured his ship was coming in until Longboat walked away from the table...
     
     
  #2750  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 3:32 PM
GreyGarden GreyGarden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 761
Portage just feels and is sooooo wide. I think its wider than any of the major east-west arteries leading into Downtown Toronto. I'm not saying thats a reason for its decline or stagnation. I can't get a handle on that either, it seems like it should be a good street (other than its width).

I really hope that in the future, the stretch of Portage between Polo Park and Downtown will become more lively. It seems like it should function in a similar way to the east-west arteries in Toronto. It has good residential to the north and south. It also has frequent transit into downtown. So I'm hopeful. new development right up to the sidewalk would make a big difference. Maybe a bit of height too - to counteract the width of the street.
     
     
  #2751  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 3:36 PM
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,782
When ALL the buses used to be on Portage there were always way more people about. Once they built those bump outs and put half the buses on Graham it seemed like everything started to die.
     
     
  #2752  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 5:16 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTA in Winnipeg View Post
When ALL the buses used to be on Portage there were always way more people about. Once they built those bump outs and put half the buses on Graham it seemed like everything started to die.
The medium-long term plan is to remove all busses from Graham once transit figures out how the BLUE Line will go down Portage.
     
     
  #2753  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 8:51 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTA in Winnipeg View Post
When ALL the buses used to be on Portage there were always way more people about. Once they built those bump outs and put half the buses on Graham it seemed like everything started to die.
When I was a kid you still bumped into people walking along Portage at all hours of the day. Well, probably not in the early morning but I was too young for that. Either way, it was dead by the time they put the cut-ins there. I figure they might as well go all the way and continue with converting the area from retail to just about anything else.
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
     
     
  #2754  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 6:03 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Thinking over this Portage Avenue thing, it's generally agreed that the mid/late 90s were kind of the bottoming out period for downtown Winnipeg [cut] retail has nearly disappeared during that time... Portage Avenue of 1997 was a better shopping street than it is now.
The changes happening in Winnipeg retail are actually part of a much larger global shift from shops on the streets to direct to consumer websites. In 1997 an idea like Kickstarter was well beyond what most people could imagine. Getting books, movie, music, etc in languages other than English was also extremely uncommon. Now you can easily hit the internet and pull those in. I recall back in the late 90s a routine lunch break would be hitting one of five or more music stores looking for what was new that I could buy. Now it is practically unheard of to buy physical music.

If you travel in the USA there is ghost retail all over the places as the recession of the early 2000s that Manitoba mostly escaped claimed many large retail chains such as Circuit City, Barnes and Noble, and Linen and Things. There is less than zero demand for these places now.

The pandemic has also really hit the accelerator on the shift of groceries from almost exclusively brick and mortar to heavily online business. As we start to move away from the immediate crunch and settle into more of a new normal those retailers are going to have an opportunity to sit back and study their real world test data and find out how to make the permanent shift. I know some people, including many posters here say it won't happen but when things got real they shifted in a hurry. For an extremely price sensitive segment such as grocery shifting from stores to fulfillment centers could provide a meaningful opportunity for cost savings which could be passed along, in part, to consumers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
That's not even getting into the social problems that used to be somewhat restricted to a few north Portage haunts but are now fairly widespread in the area.
I big part of that is the approach to "solving" the problems downtown is basically show up with a broom and sweep the dirt off the sidewalk in front of your business into the street. The fundamental issue hasn't been corrected, just a highly localized change has happened. One dive bar that is the hot spot for trouble is closed and the customers just move to a different dive bar.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Shit, I meant the Dayton Building. No wonder I made it confusing. Wow, I really fucked up this conversation.
Could have been worse. The block that Dreman is on is actually one of the blocks on Portage most primed for something big like Chipman swooping in to do a large scale redevelopment. It would actually have been a better place for True North Square other than the proximity to the arena. Imagine the tall office tower between Fort and Garry on the south side of Portage opening to a courtyard. Residential backing onto Fort with the court yard open towards Graham and Garry. Eventually Wawanessa could have replaced SkyCity, the former Pint and St Reggis. The hotel could have taken the place for where True North Square is located and been connected directly to the arena. The overall impact to downtown might actually have been larger as it would have created a nice cluster of really tall builds close to Portage and Main instead of the gap we have now between Portage and Main and True North Square that will live on forever.
     
     
  #2755  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2020, 3:26 AM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,261
Nah that shit’ll fill up, especially as south Main continues to develop after 300 Main is done. Only a matter of time and money, and the money is out there. It just needs the right reasons and the confidence instilled by other big projects being built as we speak.
     
     
  #2756  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2020, 6:05 PM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,930
In addition, as more projects fill up empty lots, more taller projects become more viable as available land becomes limited

Winnipeg is growing at a steady and healthy clip, and the projects will come with that growth.
     
     
  #2757  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2020, 6:12 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
More infill housing now along the south side of the Disraeli, although most of it (all of it) not to code and no permits were taken out or approved the city and Bowman have no problem with it.

Condo owners must be thrilled with their new neighbours!
     
     
  #2758  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2020, 6:40 PM
post_man post_man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
More infill housing now along the south side of the Disraeli, although most of it (all of it) not to code and no permits were taken out or approved the city and Bowman have no problem with it.

Condo owners must be thrilled with their new neighbours!
On Macdonald?

Last edited by post_man; Jun 15, 2020 at 5:22 AM. Reason: oh, i see
     
     
  #2759  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2020, 8:45 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
More infill housing now along the south side of the Disraeli, although most of it (all of it) not to code and no permits were taken out or approved the city and Bowman have no problem with it.

Condo owners must be thrilled with their new neighbours!
?
     
     
  #2760  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2020, 2:09 AM
Labroco's Avatar
Labroco Labroco is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
More infill housing now along the south side of the Disraeli, although most of it (all of it) not to code and no permits were taken out or approved the city and Bowman have no problem with it.

Condo owners must be thrilled with their new neighbours!
I’m hopeful the individuals displaced by MMF and the City find a more permanent shelter and solution. If they have just moved across the street onto private property they will hopefully be relocated again... quickly...

Your right though, no building permits and definitely no occupancy permits.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.