Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal
Sure but I don't expect that to happen. There aren't a lot of votes there. Anyway who cares deeply about resource development is never voting Liberal and those of who only care because it pays the bills for the rest of us are a tiny minority. Meanwhile those on the left who will vote to block Poilievre who have climate justice as one of their top issues need to be thrown a bone.
Same story pretty much on DEI and woke. The small cohort who are anti-woke and anti-racist are overwhelmed by those that vote on it from the left who think it's just about giving everyone an opportunity.
|
“… for the rest of us are a tiny minority”
I completely disagree. “For the rest of us” benefits immensely from the increase revenue generated from the resource sector, if not anything else.
Not to mention the secondary, tertiary, and beyond industries that support the sector. For example, tariffs on steel from the US? Produce the steel in Canada to use for Canadian projects. Manufacturing of components and equipment? Source from Canada. labour shortage? Source from all corners of the country.
This country is incredibly rich is resources, that the entire globe demands. We need to leverage our resources to the absolute maximum, now that our largest trading partner has decided to completely undermine our relationship. F the USA, let’s leverage our resources to the max with our new global partners.
Why does the majority of the west vote conservative? It’s because we know we are a resource based economy, and simply want all red tape that serves a very minimal purpose, if any at all, other than to make it look like we are reducing our impact t on the global environment, when in fact we are just re-allocating it to the next country who would happily fill the void in supply.
We all benefit to some degree by leveraging our resources, and developing them in a sustainable way.