HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2721  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 4:53 AM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
Plot thickens. DCDLS in the mix now.

I feel as though this whole Sens/Lebreton saga could make a good movie some day ... with the right ending (Melnyk launched into the sun for one).
Great idea! Let me guess, this will be done while plutonium rock band Disaster Area plays their hit song titled Spaceship Superstar. 😉
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2722  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 1:33 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
I was listening to the municipal panel on CBC Morning Radio. They mostly discussed the latest news on the bus crash investigation, but they did talk about LeBreton for a few minutes. It seems they've been complaints of "collusion" with the two groups now coming together to discuss a solution, along with a complaint to the Competition Bureau.

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/shows/otta...gment/15664323

I can understand why this sort of concern would be raised. At the end of the day however, this seems to be allowed within the competition process from my understanding. If they do come to an agreement, it would probably be best in order to prevent lawsuits against the NCC for either or both groups.

Last edited by J.OT13; Jan 17, 2019 at 2:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2723  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 2:07 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I was listening to the municipal panel on CBC Morning Radio. They mostly discussed the latest news on the bus crash investigation, but they did talk about LeBreton for a few minutes. It seems they've been complaints of "collusion" with the two groups now coming together to discuss a solution, along with a complaint to the Competition Bureau.

I can understand why this sort of concern would be raised. At the end of the day however, this seems to be allowed within the competition process from my understanding. If they do come to an agreement, it would probably be best in order to prevent lawsuits against the NCC for either or both groups.
While I'm not sure I'd go so far as to brand it as collusion, I do think there is a legitimate concern about the new inclusion of DLDCS into the equation. In some respects, I think there are benefits to blending the best of both proposals, but at the same time, to do so would also be effectively circumventing the entire bid and acceptance process as any modified bid would fundamentally not be what had been initially accepted by NCC.

However, to fully restart the entire bidding process would also be costly and massively time-consuming. Bureaucracy sucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2724  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 2:49 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Great idea! Let me guess, this will be done while plutonium rock band Disaster Area plays their hit song titled Spaceship Superstar. 😉
If we had post voting, this allusion would definitely get a thumbs up.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2725  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 4:50 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
While I'm not sure I'd go so far as to brand it as collusion, I do think there is a legitimate concern about the new inclusion of DLDCS into the equation. In some respects, I think there are benefits to blending the best of both proposals, but at the same time, to do so would also be effectively circumventing the entire bid and acceptance process as any modified bid would fundamentally not be what had been initially accepted by NCC.

However, to fully restart the entire bidding process would also be costly and massively time-consuming. Bureaucracy sucks.
If the two groups come to an agreement, it will be interesting to see how they blend in aspects of both proposals. During Poulin's media run last month, he stressed that the NCC and RVL have done a lot of work and invested a lot of money therefor,e it would be ashamed to throw all of it out. Based on those comments, I would think they would preserve as much of the RVL vision as possible.

They could insert a few of the DCDLS components that were popular and/or provided solid commitments:

Ripley's Aquarium on the corner of the Parkway and Trillium tracks with views of the river (orientated N/S or E/W).

As I've mentioned a few posts back, the YMCA could be integrated with the Abilities Centre/Sensplex.

The Canadensis Walk could be situated around the N/W corner of the arena, offering views of the river.

The Library and Elementry School both have plans elsewhere, so no need to find a spot.

Retirement and Student Residences could go anywhere on the site. I would place students near Bayview, for easy access to Carleton, uOttawa and Algonquin.

Farm Boy can go anywhere. I would recommend corner of Booth and Line 1, with direct access to Pimisi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2726  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 6:05 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
While I'm not sure I'd go so far as to brand it as collusion, I do think there is a legitimate concern about the new inclusion of DLDCS into the equation. In some respects, I think there are benefits to blending the best of both proposals, but at the same time, to do so would also be effectively circumventing the entire bid and acceptance process as any modified bid would fundamentally not be what had been initially accepted by NCC.
I'm not sure how joining DLDCS into the process circumvents the bid process. You had an open bidding process and two bidders put in bids, which were evaluated. There is no third bidder to be disadvantaged by anything that happens after the fact.

There is no rule in procurement that prevents an organization from accepting better terms than those that were bid. The selected bidder can always enhance their bid at the negotiation phase. That is what would be happening here if they allow DLDCS to join the partnership. And I strongly suspect that the RFP had language to the effect that the NCC had the freedom to accept all or part of any bids that were submitted, so there would be leeway there.

The only issue would be if RVL is allowed to so something that materially diminishes their bid, or worse, that doesn't meet the original RFP terms. Then you would have a procurement issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2727  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:04 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
They could insert a few of the DCDLS components that were popular and/or provided solid commitments:

Ripley's Aquarium on the corner of the Parkway and Trillium tracks with views of the river (orientated N/S or E/W).
Aquariums are so antiquated. Why do we still feel the need to imprison animals for our personal enjoyment? It is one thing if its purpose is rehabilitating injured animals in the hopes of releasing them, but that would be best served in a coastal city. Are they going to focus on rehabilitating local freshwater fish other local marine animals? I doubt it.

Quote:
As I've mentioned a few posts back, the YMCA could be integrated with the Abilities Centre/Sensplex.

The Canadensis Walk could be situated around the N/W corner of the arena, offering views of the river.

The Library and Elementry School both have plans elsewhere, so no need to find a spot.

Retirement and Student Residences could go anywhere on the site. I would place students near Bayview, for easy access to Carleton, uOttawa and Algonquin.

Farm Boy can go anywhere. I would recommend corner of Booth and Line 1, with direct access to Pimisi.
Agreed. I have often thought that Bayview would be a great location for private student residences. Something like EVO in Montreal. If STO ends up using the POW bridge for their LRT, it would also have direct service to UQO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2728  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:07 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Aquariums are so antiquated. Why do we still feel the need to imprison animals for our personal enjoyment?
It's a bit of a stretch to say that we are "imprisoning" fish in a giant fish tank.

Have you been to the Ripley's in Toronto? It is super cool.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2729  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:23 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradnixon View Post
It's a bit of a stretch to say that we are "imprisoning" fish in a giant fish tank.
Why do you say that? Would you want to be confined to a pen about the same size as one of the shark tanks for the rest of your life?

Quote:
Have you been to the Ripley's in Toronto? It is super cool.
I haven't, but I have been to the Vancouver Aquarium. Not necessarily the same I admit, but I don't feel I have to tour every aquarium in the continent to have an opinion though.

From what I have read, Ripley's may have a lot of fun facts, it is a bit sparse in educating the public about conservation.

https://nowtoronto.com/lifestyle/eco...-conservation/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2730  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 4:41 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Aquariums are so antiquated. Why do we still feel the need to imprison animals for our personal enjoyment? It is one thing if its purpose is rehabilitating injured animals in the hopes of releasing them, but that would be best served in a coastal city. Are they going to focus on rehabilitating local freshwater fish other local marine animals? I doubt it.
I'm also not a fan of aquariums and zoos. I had a similar post a few weeks ago on this thread. As you mentioned, I see the benefits for injured animals or to try and bring up the numbers of endangered species. Don't agree with caging animals purely for entertainment value.

End of the day however, the aquarium was one of the few DCDLS tenants that seem to have been secured and it was quite popular among the public. It has also been discussed for years (Daly Building site and Landowne). If they make a deal (DCDLS and RVL), we're likely getting an aquarium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2731  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 5:41 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,200
How Montreal money could fix the LeBreton Flats partnership

James Bagnall, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: January 18, 2019


Every good mediator understands there are times when warring parties simply aren’t ready to deal.

So it was in 2012 and 2013 when former Ontario chief justice Warren Winkler spent nearly a year off and on meeting with Nortel’s main creditors. A last ditch mediation effort in January 2013 ran hard into a wall of resistance built by the owners of Nortel’s bonds. After multiple extensions, Winkler concluded no deal was to be had. Indeed, it would be another four years before a comprehensive agreement emerged.

Winkler, retired since 2013, now 80, has given himself until the end of February to try to mediate a seemingly intractable dispute between Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk and Trinity Development founder John Ruddy — the main partners of RendezVous LeBreton. At stake: the future of a 20-year, $4-billion project to remake LeBreton Flats.

With the partnership mired in $1.7 billion worth of claims and counterclaims, and with clear evidence the partners simply don’t trust one another, the odds of a diplomatic breakthrough look slim.

But, unlike the situation at Nortel, Winkler has two things running in favour of a settlement. The first is the very real prospect the LeBreton project, at least one led by these two partners, could simply die without a deal. At Nortel, it was always understood the proceeds of the estate would be distributed eventually — the issue was on what terms.

The second difference may be the most important. There is a third party at the table in the LeBreton mediation efforts who could help Winkler shape a deal — in part by providing needed cash and equity but also by creating a buffer between Melnyk and Ruddy.

When the National Capital Commission signed a term sheet with RendezVous LeBreton 12 months ago, it was understood there was room for a third partner — and members of the runner-up bid from Devcore Canderel DLS team are a logical fit.

The RendezVous LeBreton plan comprises some three-dozen smaller projects to build condos, retail shops, a hotel, offices and an NHL arena. There is room here for negotiating a split of the related revenue streams and projected profits.

The Devcore group — which includes Power Corp. deputy chairman André Desmarais, Cirque du Soleil founder Guy Laliberté, JDS Uniphase co-founder Bill Sinclair and the Mierins family — has been waiting in the wings in case the NCC’s first choice, RendezVous LeBreton, blew up. Failing that, members of the Devcore alliance, nearly all of them Montreal based, have made pitches to get involved as a partner.

Last year, for instance, certain Devcore members offered more than $430 million US to buy the Ottawa Senators and current arena — which Melnyk turned down. The Devcore alliance has also made clear, as an alternative, its willingness to build a $500-million US arena on LeBreton Flats, encouraging Melnyk to become a tenant.

Since much of the difficulty between Melnyk and Ruddy stems from arguments over how to finance the construction of a new arena, Montreal money could be key to salvaging the RendezVous LeBreton project.

At the very least, it would help spread the financial risks. Melnyk’s last public proposal, presented Dec. 18 in a statement over the signature of the Ottawa Senators’ chief operating officer Nicolas Ruszkowski, called for Melnyk to forfeit his right to all future profits on LeBreton in exchange for rent-free access to an arena built and paid for by others.

This, of course, would put 100 per cent of the risk on Ruddy, which is one reason he dismissed the idea out of hand. But a formal role for Devcore partners might change his perspective.

Unknown is what potential Devcore players would demand in exchange for their money and participation. Ruddy and fellow RendezVous LeBreton partner Graham Bird have spent more than two years lining up dozens of subcontractors — some of whom presumably would have to be cut to make way for specialists associated with Devcore.

The cleanest deal would see either Melnyk or Ruddy leave the partnership altogether. In one scenario, Devcore partners would purchase the Ottawa Senators and current arena from Melnyk, then negotiate directly with Ruddy to stitch together a revised RendezVous LeBreton project. An alternative would be to see Devcore and Melnyk team up, thereby cutting out Ruddy.

But how likely are these? Not very. Ruddy views LeBreton as a signature project that could cement his legacy as a hometown developer.

Senators’ insiders for years have reported Melnyk has no interest in selling the team. By turning down an offer of $430 million US plus — about the same as the latest valuation estimated by Forbes Magazine — he is making it clear buying the Senators would be an expensive proposition.

Consider that a hypothetical new owner would have to shell out, say, $450 million US for the team and current arena in Kanata. Then there’s another $500 million US for the new arena in LeBreton. That’s nearly $1 billion. And, while the Montreal Canadiens and Toronto Maple Leafs are each valued by Forbes at more than $1.3 billion U.S., those teams generate nearly twice as much revenue each year and more than fifty times the operating income.

Of course, Melnyk could choose to pay commercial rent to the owner of the new arena. But in his litigation against Ruddy, Melnyk was not prepared to consider anything more than nominal rent — $1 per year.

Much of Melnyk’s litigation reflects his view that Ruddy’s participation in a nearby apartment-and-offices development at 900 Albert St. is undercutting the economics of RendezVous LeBreton.

As mediator, Winkler will have to sort out whether Melnyk is simply engaging in hardball bargaining or whether his economic interests really are being harmed.

A complicating factor has been the relative tightness of Melnyk’s cash flow. When he acquired the Ottawa Senators out of bankruptcy in 2003, he paid $100 million CAD for the team and $27.5 million CAD for the arena. At the time, the value of his shares in Biovail — the pharmaceutical company he founded in 1989 — were worth more than $1.6 billion CAD.

But within weeks of buying the team, Biovail reported unexpectedly weak financial results. By 2005, the value of Melnyk’s Biovail holdings had slumped to $441 million. Four years later, Melnyk lost control of Biovail (now called Bausch Health Corp.), then sold off his shares for several hundred million dollars, according to financial filings.

Melnyk did well by the Senators, which have appreciated in value by some $345 million US since he acquired the team. However, because he incurred losses along the way, and reinvested in the arena, Melnyk added debt along the way. It currently represents about $200 million US of the estimated $435 million US value of the team. To his benefit, half the debt is in the form of a low-interest NHL loan facility.

In short, Melnyk is far from poor, but less wealthy than he was. The NHL franchise is his big asset. The value he puts on it, along with the price he is willing to pay for his team to play in a new arena, will be the wild cards in Winkler’s mediation efforts.

Less clear in all this is the state of Trinity’s finances. Ruddy’s firm is private, making it difficult to assess just how liquid it is. Given Ruddy’s strong track record of real estate development, it’s a good bet he could raise the necessary equity to launch the LeBreton project. The same could be said of Melnyk. What’s missing is mutual trust.

The participation of Devcore partners and Montreal money could be what helps Winkler devise the financial formula that rescues this landmark Ottawa project.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...ts-partnership
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2732  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2019, 3:43 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,200
Outgoing NCC head says agency has plan 'ready to go' if RendezVous LeBreton tanks

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: January 24, 2019


The outgoing chief executive of the National Capital Commission suggested Thursday that the federal agency would immediately work to build a new community on LeBreton Flats if RendezVous LeBreton Group tanks at the end of February.

The NCC has prepared “a viable alternative approach” to the transformation of the contaminated land near downtown and that plan is ready to go, Mark Kristmanson said.

He wouldn’t get into specifics, but it’s clear the agency doesn’t want to lose momentum on trying to re-inject life at LeBreton Flats.

“It really focuses on bringing the community back to LeBreton Flats and to get it done, to listen to all the feedback that we’ve had,” Kristmanson said after his last public board meeting as head of the Crown agency.

“I think the original proposal has great merit with respect to everything from affordable housing to connectivity to sustainable design to introducing more public space. All of these things we’ve heard from the public can be introduced into the (RendezVous) proposal, but of course in another proposal, we could go directly to that and really focus on community-building and getting people living around those stations in a state-of-the-art transit-orientated development.”

The NCC is waiting to see if a mediator can help the embittered RendezVous partners make up by Feb. 28. For now, it’s still an active request for proposals (RFP) process.

The key players at RendezVous are Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk, Trinity Developments founder John Ruddy and project manager Graham Bird. The mediation among the men started this month after Melnyk sued Ruddy and Bird in November. Ruddy filed a counter claim against Melnyk in December. Bird filed a statement of defence.

RendezVous has wanted to build a mixed-use community anchored by an arena.

Devcore Canderel DLS, the runner-up in the NCC’s development competition, is now involved in talks with the RendezVous partners during the mediation.

DCDLS had a vision of a mixed-use community and major attractions, such as a science and innovation pavilion, bandshell, skatepark, skydiving simulator and an 18,500-seat entertainment facility plugged into Bayview Station.

The NCC was ready to scrap its development deal with RendezVous as of last Saturday, but the NCC board last week allowed more time for mediation.

Board chair Marc Seaman said RendezVous has an experienced mediator in former Ontario chief justice Warren Winkler and it made sense to grant an extension.

“We’d rather try too hard than not hard enough to make sure we have all opportunities to make this project worthwhile,” Seaman said.

Kristmanson said the NCC is ready to move on if RendezVous falls through but he hopes the businessmen can find a solution.

“The vision is strong. It will be a shame if it doesn’t work because it’s unlikely to get a vision that strong, that coherent in any kind of future iteration,” Kristmanson said.

But he emphasized the need for patience to make the vision a reality.

“Patience on this is a good thing. It’s been empty (land) for a long time, but it needs to be done right and it needs to be done with the forces that can carry it through two or three decades of development to achieve the full vision.”

Kristmanson said there have been big gains on LeBreton Flats over the years, despite the all the attention lately on the current redevelopment challenges. The Canadian War Museum was established there, the City of Ottawa built LRT through the property, and Claridge Homes built condos on the east lands. Plus, the NCC has spent millions on cleaning the soil, he said.

“LeBreton has been moving in a way, even though it looks like a big empty expanse,” Kristmanson said.

“I think we’re poised now for the next big move. The trains are going to start to move. That’s a big missing tooth in the Confederation Boulevard and the core of the capital and I think there’s a business rationale to get it done, there’s a government rationale to get it done and certainly a planning-design rationale from the NCC to get it done. I think this will impel ultimately the resolution of these issues, either within the RFP process or if necessary the board is ready to move ahead with the next step.”

Kristmanson has been CEO since 2014 but he has worked for the NCC since 2004.

He said some of the highlights of his time in charge of the NCC include improving public consultations and building the National Holocaust Monument across from the War Museum.

Tobi Nussbaum is leaving his job as Ottawa city councillor and will take over as NCC CEO on Feb. 4.

[email protected]
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...lebreton-tanks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2733  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2019, 5:00 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
RendezVous LeBreton Group mediation set to get underway Monday

Bruce Garrioch
Post Media
February 4, 2019


Talks to build a downtown arena at LeBreton Flats are about to get serious.

League sources told Postmedia on the weekend mediation involving Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk and partner John Ruddy of the Trinity Development Group is heating up with several days of meetings scheduled to start Monday in Toronto in an attempt to try to the save RendezVous LeBreton’s deal with the National Capital Commission.

Details of exactly who’s involved in the process and the timeline of the talks being mediated by the former Ontario chief justice Warren Winkler this week are being kept under wraps. It’s also unclear whether project manager Graham Bird, who revealed there was going to mediation in a statement Jan. 4, is involved in these discussions to save the $4-billion project.

Winkler has offices in Toronto and Ottawa. The Senators are in Toronto on Wednesday night to face the Maple Leafs at Scotiabank Arena.

The National Capital Commission, which had served noticed to the RendezVous LeBreton partners it would terminate the agreement on Jan. 19, has granted Melnyk and Ruddy until Feb. 28 to work out their differences. Winkler asked for the extension on Jan. 9 and it was granted by the NCC’s board on Jan. 14.

It’s believed a representative from Devcore Canderel DLS, the second-place finisher in the bid to redevelop LeBreton Flats, will play a role in these discussions. It’s not clear exactly what that will be, but there is talk the runner-up could play a big role if there’s going to be a resolution and a new arena is built on the Flats.

The NCC was scheduled to discuss LeBreton Flats during its meeting Jan. 24, but that was taken off the agenda because there is still a hope the deal with RLG can be negotiated through mediation. If there wasn’t any chance, the NCC would have simply moved on, however, a lot of work has been done on this file and it’s worth saving.

The RLG bid looked all but dead in December after Melnyk launched a $700-million lawsuit against Ruddy, and Bird and Trinity countersued for $1 billion. Not long after, the NCC issued notice to both parties on Dec. 19 they had 30 days to solve their differences.

But the reality is nothing is ever over until it’s over and everybody involved would like to find a way to make this dream a reality. Make no mistake: the NCC doesn’t look good, and though the board indicated last month the organization was ready to continue with the project, nobody has any idea what route would take without an arena.

Melnyk is prepared to move the Senators downtown. However, he wants to do so under the right circumstances and with the right deal. He has the full backing of National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman, but Bettman wasn’t saying much about the matter when he was asked about an Ottawa arena last weekend at the all-star game.

“I always find it difficult to show up to a party that I’m not invited to,” Bettman told reporters in San Jose. “It’s complicated. There are lots of moving parts and I think it would be premature for me to suggest any result and probably it wouldn’t be particularly helpful for me to say anything more.

“Everybody sit tight.”

You can be guaranteed Bettman has been kept abreast of what’s happening by Melnyk, and the NHL is supportive of whatever the organization finds agreeable — even if that means staying at the Canadian Tire Centre.

The best bet for the NCC is to hope this mediation will work in some way, shape or form.

No matter what happens, the two sides need to get past the biggest issue: the 900 Albert St. condominium project Ruddy’s Trinity group is building across the street from LeBreton Flats. That is the crux of Melnyk’s disagreement because he believes it’s going to hurt the ability of the RLG bid to be profitable.

Nobody involved in this process will be saying much publicly until it’s over.

The fact mediation is taking the next step is a significant, positive move, and that both sides have agreed to take part means they want to see if they can find a way to get this project back on track. They have a huge gap to close and it’s interesting to see where DCDLS fits in all of this.

Stay tuned.

https://ottawasun.com/sports/hockey/...nderway-monday
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2734  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2019, 5:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
DEAL OR NO DEAL: Still ways to compromise on LeBreton - here's how

James Bagnall
Post Media
February 4, 2019


The contrast could hardly be sharper.

In Inglewood, California, an army of construction workers is transforming a 300-acre site into a sports and entertainment district anchored by a 70,240-seat stadium. It will be the home next year for the Los Angeles Rams, one of the contenders in Sunday’s Super Bowl.

Billionaire and Rams owner Stanley Kroenke is contributing $1.6 billion U.S. in personal equity to ensure this $5-billion U.S. community of hotels, residences, offices and retail shop gets built.

Meanwhile in Ottawa, a 53-acre site at LeBreton Flats sits empty as the city awaits the results of last-ditch mediation between Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk and Trinity Development founder John Ruddy. The two entrepreneurs are embroiled in a legal war over who should contribute what to jump-start a 20-year, $4-billion project anchored by an 18,000-seat NHL arena.

The difference in the state of the two developments is all the more dramatic when you consider they also have much in common — neither project relies on government funding, depending instead on multiple streams of revenue from real estate projects and stadium events.

Both developments are massive, complex and risky. Yet, the Inglewood project — known as LA Stadium & Entertainment District — has managed to establish a working relationship between team owner Kroenke and real-estate developer Wilson Meany. The partners happened to purchase adjoining pieces of land and found common cause.

Kroenke’s immense wealth is obviously a big factor in smoothing out differences and keeping overall risk low. He and his wife, Ann Walton Kroenke, are worth a combined $15 billion U.S., according to Forbes Magazine.

On the other hand, neither Melnyk nor Ruddy is on Forbes’s billionaires list. Raising initial capital for the LeBreton project accordingly is not only more complicated, it’s fraught with potential for disagreement. Indeed, this early stage of the development is the primary focus of mediation efforts by former Ontario chief justice Warren Winkler, who is racing to meet a Feb. 28 deadline imposed by the National Capital Commission, the federal crown corporation in charge of the LeBreton project.

To understand what it will take to reach a settlement, rewind to 2016, when the NCC selected RendezVous LeBreton — created by Melnyk and Ruddy — as its preferred bidder for remaking the LeBreton district.

The original concept was to spend $1 billion or so to prepare and clean up the site and build a stadium. As with any major real-estate project, this step would automatically raise the value of the overall property. RendezVous LeBreton’s partners intended to raise money from lenders based on this increased price. Later on, as the project added condos, retailing and other elements, they would entice other investors.

Melnyk and Ruddy agreed to split the project’s initial ownership 50:50 — which demanded they each contribute between $175 million and $200 million upfront. This is where they got stuck.

Melnyk’s equity was to be applied against the cost of the stadium. The Senators’ owner proposed raising the money through a loan secured against a long-term rent agreement for the new stadium. In one scenario he would also contribute an estimated $35 million to $40 million in proceeds from the sale of the Kanata arena. The remainder of the costs for the $500-million U.S. stadium would be met by a lender willing to accept LeBreton’s future real estate profits as collateral. It was understood that Melnyk wouldn’t own the arena. Rather, the latter would be a not-for-profit facility owned by the city, which would not have to pay a dime.

For his part, Ruddy is understood to have proposed raising his share of the initial equity financing through a combination of cash, and loans secured against LeBreton’s future profits. The two partners could participate in later LeBreton projects by investing fresh equity in stages.

This formula naturally depends on the various components of the project coming on stream as projected.

The relationship between the RendezVous LeBreton partners fractured when Melnyk began studying the potential impact of the nearby apartments-offices-and-retailing development at 900 Albert — in which Trinity is a significant player. Melnyk’s view, outlined in a $700-million statement of claim, is that sales at 900 Albert will undermine the economics of the LeBreton project. He cited a study he commissioned from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

Ruddy replied in his $1-billion counterclaim that there is ample room for both projects. He produced a pair of supporting studies by Urbanation, alleging that Melnyk is using 900 Albert as a negotiating ploy to extract a better financial deal for himself.

Whatever the motivation, Melnyk scaled back his financial commitment to the LeBreton project in response to what he said was his increased risk.

In a November 2018 term sheet outlining his conditions for withdrawing from the RendezVous LeBreton partnership, Melnyk said that if the City of Ottawa and Ruddy’s Trinity Development agreed to split the costs of building the arena, he would sign a 30-year lease for $1 per year, this according to a counterclaim filed by Ruddy in December. In a public statement issued shortly after the counterclaim, Senators chief operating officer Nicolas Ruszkowski did not dispute the claim but explained that Melnyk in exchange was giving up his right to future LeBreton project profits.

Since Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson has made it clear the city will not contribute to financing an NHL arena, Melnyk’s proposal in any case seems to be a non-starter.

Nevertheless, there appears room for a smart mediator — which Winkler most certainly is — to coax a settlement that will get the LeBreton project back on track.

It’s a question of assigning the risks against the considerable potential gains in this epic project. If Melnyk does not want to participate in future profits, he can confine himself to the role of tenant who pays no rent. If Ruddy wants to diversify his exposure, he can invite in members of Devcore Canderel DLS — the team ranked second by the National Capital Commission for the LeBreton project. Devcore Canderel would naturally expect, in exchange for its money and expertise, to participate in LeBreton’s various projects.

There is also room for compromise on the numbers. Would Melnyk accept paying a certain amount of arena rent — $50 million, $100 million? Would Ruddy consider allowing Melnyk to keep the cash proceeds from selling the current arena in Kanata? To say nothing of the possibilities should Melnyk decide he is fed up with owning the Senators — and offers to sell both team and arena.

Somewhere in here is a formula that will one day see LeBreton Flats accommodate as many building trades people as currently swarm the proposed new home for the LA Rams. Yes, that project broke ground late in 2016 — against the previously scheduled 2019 start for the LeBreton project. But it offers some hope that building out LeBreton can actually be done.

https://ottawasun.com/news/local-new...4-0acbb0159303
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2735  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2019, 12:22 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,636
The author sort of glosses over what happend to the plans for a lender to cover almost all of the costs. Presumably this fell through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2736  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2019, 2:18 AM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
The author sort of glosses over what happend to the plans for a lender to cover almost all of the costs. Presumably this fell through.
Why do you say that? It’s been reported that Melnyk balked at the division of costs, but I’ve never seen any mention of a lender pulling out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2737  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2019, 3:22 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
Why do you say that? It’s been reported that Melnyk balked at the division of costs, but I’ve never seen any mention of a lender pulling out.
Because none of the articles nor court filings make any reference to any deal with a lender or any mention of a lender after the initial planning phase. Maybe they had one but nobody mentioned it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2738  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2019, 11:13 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,200
No more extensions in LeBreton mediation, Heritage Minister says

James Bagnall, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: February 26, 2019


It seemed like loads of time. In mid-January the National Capital Commission granted the feuding Rendezvous LeBreton partners an extension until Feb. 28 to reach a deal on the 20-year, $4 billion project to redevelop LeBreton Flats.

Turns out, there was too much time. It’s rare that a mediation effort — such as the one led here by former Ontario chief justice Warren Winkler — lasts much longer than a day or two. Often it takes the threat of a real deadline to force changes in position. And now we have what looks to be a firm cutoff date.

“The NCC was very clear,” Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez said Tuesday. “There’s a deadline for February 28th and there will be no extension.”

The main issue, as it has been for some time, is how the project’s extensive risks and potentially large profits should be shared. Shortly before the relationship between Ruddy and Melnyk degenerated late last year into $1.7 billion in suits and countersuits, Melnyk had been willing to forgo his share of the profits in exchange for a rent-free arena for his Ottawa Senators. Ruddy has been insisting that Melnyk should pay arena rent on commercial terms.

If there’s no agreement Thursday between Trinity Development founder John Ruddy and Eugene Melnyk that would spell the end of their Rendezvous LeBreton partnership. It would also free the NCC to launch a new process for redeveloping the Flats. The NCC warned six weeks ago that it had plans already in place, but would wait to see if Winkler’s mediation proved successful.

Rodriguez made clear Tuesday the NCC is still committed to a transformative project on LeBreton Flats. Whether this would mean starting a competitive bidding contest from scatch is an open question. Such a turn would give members of Devcore Canderel DLS — the runners-up in the contest to redevelop LeBreton — a shot at taking part, perhaps in partnership with either Ruddy or Melnyk.

But we may yet be getting ahead of ourselves. Perhaps Thursday’s deadline will finally prompt Ruddy and Melnyk to cut a deal. It’s just wise not to count on it.

https://ottawacitizen.com/business/l...-minister-says
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2739  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 2:41 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,631
Melnyk visits Parliament on Monday, and on Tuesday the Minister makes these comments. I know his office said no one, from the office, met with him, but that leaves the door wide open to other scenarios.

Would be strange if Melnyk on his own asked for an extension considering it was Justice Winkler who requested the initial extension. Maybe Melnyk was trying to get an extension in order to negotiate a better deal for himself, but will now have to sign off with whatever offer is on the table? Or the plan is officially dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2740  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 4:08 AM
c_speed3108 c_speed3108 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,854
The fact that he was getting into a vehicle on the hill is quite interesting. The average joe does not get to do that. It appears in the video he was coming from the west block so it is likely he was visiting a minister or MP (or staff) rather than a (political) senator.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:53 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.