HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2641  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 9:09 AM
SFBruin SFBruin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,191
I think that the poster is referring to getting off at Church and Market and just walking to Van Ness.
__________________
Not a professional photographer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2642  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2020, 8:13 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,880
Sonoma-Marin commuter rail sees 26% ridership rise in January after new ferry link, more frequent trains


Passengers disembark the SMART train at the newly opened Larkspur SMART Train Station after taking the inaugural ride to Larkspur, Calif., on Saturday, December 14, 2019. (Photo by Darryl Bush / For The Press Democrat)

Jeff Quackenbush
North Bay Business Journal
February 6, 2020
Quote:
Train ridership between Sonoma and Marin counties appears to have received a sizable January boost, which the transit agency attributed to a number of service upgrades in the past two months such as a new San Francisco ferry link and shorter times between trains.

And the initial figures may point to SMART as not just a north-south commute option.

SMART trains last month had 26% more riders than a year before, according to spokeswoman Julia Gonzalez. . . In mid-December, the Larkspur station opened, realizing . . . a link to the terminal for ferry travel to and from San Francisco. The agency also launched a $12 “sail and rail” pass that includes a midday and weekend ride on the train and the ferry.

Last month, SMART also cut the time between trains to 32 minutes, filling in gaps in services of an hour and a half during parts of the midday and evening. Another service addition was the opening of the downtown Novato station. . . .
It's not rocket science--connectivity and frequency are paramount for good public transportation.
__________________
Chaos upon my enemies, chaos upon my enemies, chaos upon my enemies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2643  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 3:10 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,385
Does anyone have any recent photos of the Caltrain electrification?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2644  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 7:30 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
Does anyone have any recent photos of the Caltrain electrification?
I found a couple of photos (not terribly recent):




Source: https://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=C...AE&biw=1464&bih=757#imgrc=kT3d7bzBKdXYxM

The construction site has an image gallery but the pictures there don't tell me much: https://calmod.org/construction-photos/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2645  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2020, 5:33 AM
urbanflight urbanflight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 43
Thanks for the pics.

Do we know what the new train fleet will look like?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2646  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2020, 2:23 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 13,065
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2647  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2020, 4:41 AM
SFBruin SFBruin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,191
Looks great! More cities should do this.
__________________
Not a professional photographer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2648  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 6:12 PM
urbanflight urbanflight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Thanks for the answer. It is a nice improvement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2649  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 7:33 PM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is offline
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clearlake, CA Micropolitan Statistical Area
Posts: 17,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBruin View Post
Looks great! More cities should do this.
I know capitol corridor has plans for it and I see that it would be easy to convince SMART to do a study on it.
__________________
#ruralurbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2650  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 3:08 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,880
I've seen some aspirational 'vision statements' for electrifying the Capitol Corridor, and I'm all for it, but do they really have a credible plan?
__________________
Chaos upon my enemies, chaos upon my enemies, chaos upon my enemies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2651  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 8:11 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
I've seen some aspirational 'vision statements' for electrifying the Capitol Corridor, and I'm all for it, but do they really have a credible plan?
All it really takes is money and also the Capital Corridor route may be a bit easier to do than the CalTrain because on the Peninsula there are so many grade crossings which, if not removed (by making the crossing above or below grade) will slow even an electric train to a crawl. I don't recall so many such crossings on the Capital Corridor route. What can slow that down, though, is the Sacramento River bridges. I was in a train one time that waited 4 hours while the bridge was open for a ship to pass which turned out to be a phantom ship--didn't exist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2652  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 2:31 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
All it really takes is money and also the Capital Corridor route may be a bit easier to do than the CalTrain because on the Peninsula there are so many grade crossings which, if not removed (by making the crossing above or below grade) will slow even an electric train to a crawl. I don't recall so many such crossings on the Capital Corridor route. What can slow that down, though, is the Sacramento River bridges. I was in a train one time that waited 4 hours while the bridge was open for a ship to pass which turned out to be a phantom ship--didn't exist.
While Caltrain maximum service speed will still be 79mph trips will take less time due to faster acceleration (EMUs) and reduced dwell times (bye gallery cars). Last I saw the cost of full grade separation in the Caltrain corridor is aprox $10B. Absent some significant state and federal support that money isn't likely to be forthcoming soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2653  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 3:35 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,614
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
I've seen some aspirational 'vision statements' for electrifying the Capitol Corridor, and I'm all for it, but do they really have a credible plan?
Caltrain is not funding the electrification with its own money. Most of the money is coming from CHSR and the USDOT. Are there many other commuter rail operators in the USA that will be sharing tracks with a HSR train - where the money to electrify the tracks is coming from? Caltrain is basically fully funding its brand new trains - not the catenary above them nor the electrical power along the corridor.
Is California planning to run CHSR over the Capitol Corridor? It is fairly easy to fund electrification using someone else's money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2654  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2020, 7:21 PM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is offline
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clearlake, CA Micropolitan Statistical Area
Posts: 17,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
All it really takes is money and also the Capital Corridor route may be a bit easier to do than the CalTrain because on the Peninsula there are so many grade crossings which, if not removed (by making the crossing above or below grade) will slow even an electric train to a crawl. I don't recall so many such crossings on the Capital Corridor route. What can slow that down, though, is the Sacramento River bridges. I was in a train one time that waited 4 hours while the bridge was open for a ship to pass which turned out to be a phantom ship--didn't exist.
If I remember right, part of the state rail plan is to remove all at grade crossings. I'm not sure if that counts super rural areas or just urban..
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Is California planning to run CHSR over the Capitol Corridor? It is fairly easy to fund electrification using someone else's money.
No, it's just electrification. They are considering making capitol corridor passenger only, and to move freight to the old SNR tracks.
Oh and projects all over the country are a combination of federal, state, and other funds so it's not a big deal. We voted for a bond so at least let us have that...please?
__________________
#ruralurbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2655  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2020, 5:28 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,614
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by TWAK View Post
Oh and projects all over the country are a combination of federal, state, and other funds so it's not a big deal. We voted for a bond so at least let us have that...please?
Did I suggest Caltrain or Capitol Corridor should not get any funds from others?
What I tried to show was how Caltrain found the money - getting lots of funding from CHSR - and why the Capitol Corridor may not since CHSR will not be using that route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2656  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2020, 1:29 AM
redblock redblock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 62
The first Stadler electric train set for the San Jose to San Francisco Caltrain corridor will begin a two month test period.in April on a test track at the Stadler plant in Salt Lake City.

https://www.progressiverailroading.com/m...rst-electrified-trainset-in-April--60083
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2657  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2020, 5:48 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 50,586
New tax for Caltrain? Measure this fall could fund trains every 10 minutes

https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/03/n...fall-could-fund-trains-every-10-minutes/

Quote:
.....

- The measure would raise $108 million per year for the agency with a new sales tax of one-eighth of a cent in Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties if voters approve it this fall. Caltrain would put that money toward its ambitious plans to provide more frequent service with a new fleet of electrified trains. That would allow the agency to shift over the next several years from a commuter railroad whose schedule riders must plan their days around to one more comparable to BART, with service so frequent passengers just show up at a station and ride. The campaign took a first step toward the November ballot on Wednesday, when the SamTrans board of directors gave its support to a potential measure. --- Funding from the tax measure would help Caltrain run 168 trains each weekday between San Jose and San Francisco by 2022, officials say, with trains arriving every 10 minutes during peak commute hours. Gilroy and southern Santa Clara County would see more frequent service as well. Looking further into the future, Caltrain has plans to eventually run over 200 trips per day and extend its tracks to downtown San Francisco’s Salesforce Transit Center.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2658  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2020, 6:32 PM
38 Geary 38 Geary is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 11,683
With the shelter in place for the foreseeable future, now would be a great time to get all these transportation construction projects completed with minimal disturbance to commuters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2659  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2020, 8:20 PM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is offline
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clearlake, CA Micropolitan Statistical Area
Posts: 17,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
With the shelter in place for the foreseeable future, now would be a great time to get all these transportation construction projects completed with minimal disturbance to commuters.
They been using it to do maintenance, and this is a good time to speed up projects if we can.
__________________
#ruralurbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2660  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2020, 6:41 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
BART trains are mostly empty, but that doesn’t stop gate jumpers — some cars downright scary
Phil Matier April 8, 2020 Updated: April 8, 2020 6:28 a.m.

BART ridership has plummeted by more than 93 percent since the stay-at-home order was issued, and that has led to shorter service hours, longer waits between trains and near-empty stations. What hasn’t changed? The fare evaders riding the system for free.

Three weeks into the Bay Area shutdown, and BART’s two morning sweeps at San Francisco’s Embarcadero Station were pulling an average of 238 fare evaders a day off the morning-commute trains. Many of those ejected for not having a ticket were homeless or apparently mentally ill, BART officials said.

“And some are riding the system all day as a shelter,” BART Police Chief Ed Alvarez said.

BART had 24,909 riders on Monday, far below the 405,000 average daily ridership before the nine-county order went out for all nonessential Bay Area workers to stay at home.

“You might have thought that a 93% reduction in riders would have meant a reduction in fare evaders as well, but that hasn’t been the case,” BART Director Debora Allen said. She added that the people who jump the gates aren’t just cheats, they are potential health hazards to the other riders and to themselves . . . .
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/phil...stly-empty-but-that-doesn-t-15185631.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.