HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2007, 10:23 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
Damn, so the Towers on Capitol Square aren't going to happen? I just saw the thread in the archive. That sucks. I really liked their design and was looking forward to them. Nice duo like Bankers Hall Towers in Calgary. I'm sure Sacramento will have more nice projects in the future, though.
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2007, 6:27 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
Damn, so the Towers on Capitol Square aren't going to happen? I just saw the thread in the archive. That sucks. I really liked their design and was looking forward to them. Nice duo like Bankers Hall Towers in Calgary. I'm sure Sacramento will have more nice projects in the future, though.

Yeah it's an unfortunate blow, but Saca landed on his feet and is moving ahead with his 40 story Metropolitan.

As for the site at 301 CM, Cal Pers has assumed control of the site and has teamed with Los Angeles based CIM, with intentions to finish site prep and come forward with an alternative proposal they promise will be "iconic".

I think eveyone realizes it wont be the as tall as the towers, but they should be able to propose something that will still provide a tall high density residential tower (or towers) that will look sharp on that part of Capitol Mall.



As for other future projects, there are currently three towers already u/c and multiple towers working their way through the city planning process. DT Sacramento will come through this o.k.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio

Last edited by urban_encounter; Jul 5, 2007 at 7:33 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2007, 5:06 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Building boom won't quit
Commercial construction up 37% despite housing slump
Sacramento Business Journal - July 6, 2007by Michael ShawStaff writer


Residential construction has fizzled but Sacramento is otherwise booming, with about $180 million more in non-residential building under construction so far this year compared to early 2006 -- a 37 percent increase.

The area's top general contractors report they haven't seen a decline in work that typically accompanies a new-housing slump. They're tied up with projects for years to come. Still, those in the industry have cautioned that the wider effects of a prolonged housing lapse might yet materialize.

The Construction Industry Research Board in Burbank released figures last week that show non-residential construction, based on value, is significantly higher in the four-county region for the first five months of the year compared with the same period in 2006. The organization tracks construction through building permits and uses estimates provided by cities and counties to determine the value.

Yolo County had the largest year-over-year increase, about 160 percent, perhaps due to major construction projects at University of California Davis. Construction in Sacramento County increased 28 percent.

"We're booked for two years," said David Higgins, president of Harbison-Mahony-Higgins Builders Inc., the area's No. 3 contractor based on revenue of $330 million in 2006. Like other large contractors, the company does a substantial amount of work in the medical field, which hasn't been hindered by the housing market. One reason for that, Higgins said, is state seismic safety requirements. Some of the work on hospitals has already started.

"Our volume is going to be up this year and next year," said Frank DaiZovi, vice president of Turner Construction Co., the area's top builder, with $475 million in revenue last year through the Sacramento office. The company is building medical centers and schools among many other projects.

Terry Street, president of Roebbelen Contracting Inc., the area's No. 2 contractor based on revenue, said it expects earnings to equal last year's $370 million, the company's best year. It's expecting a small dip in work in mid-2008.

"There's a lot of money floating around Sacramento," Street said.

This year's boom looks to continue a trend. The value of non-residential construction has increased each of the past three years, according to the Construction Industry Research Board.

Home construction hammered
On the flip side, homebuilders are struggling. Second-quarter figures are expected to be issued next week, but the early indication is that housing analysts will report dismal sales in the Sacramento market. That's despite modest gains earlier this year and late last year; and this drop-off is hitting during the peak homebuying season.

The number of local single-family housing permits has fallen this year by 14.3 percent, according to the construction board.

Commercial contractors might have expected a similar slide, based on past experience. Higgins said the industry shadowed the housing market through previous downturns, with a lag of about a year.

The current new-home slump is already two years old with no sign of a turnaround.

One sector that might not escape housing's effects is retail establishments. Construction of stores and other retail-related buildings is 8.3 percent lower than it was at the same time last year, a decline that has been masked by the overall surge in other types of buildings.

"I'm hearing from the Bay Area companies and some in Southern California about slowing on the commercial side," said industry consultant Robert Earl, a former executive with Sundt Inc. "From a hiring perspective, the local contractors' market has softened. It's easier to find people. But it's hard to know where it's heading. It's been a different pattern on the commercial side."

Earl said that generally the market is still strong.

More competition
Other contractors reported competition for small construction jobs has increased, suggesting there is less demand at the lower end of the business. That might also be a sign of a slowdown.

But Davis said the demand for large construction projects such as schools has not caught up with the rapid growth of new homes between 2000 and 2005. There has been a push, meanwhile, to decentralize medical care and open new facilities closer to residents' homes. Demand for office space is up in most markets, with the exception being the Roseville-Rocklin area, where developers raced to erect new buildings and created a glut.

Construction jobs have held steady throughout the housing slump. As of May, the area had about 70,000 employees in construction, only about 600 fewer than a year ago, less than a 1 percent drop, according to the state Employment Development Department.

Said Higgins of the situation, "Sacramento might be to the point where there is a critical mass."
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2007, 7:43 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
$85 million expansion for Crocker Art Museum
By Mary Lynne Vellinga - Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, July 26, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

Print | E-Mail | Comments (7)| Digg it | del.icio.us


New York architect Charles Gwathmey has designed the modern addition to the Crocker, with skylights on the roof.
Sacramento Bee/Autumn Cruz

Downtown Sacramento has seen some spectacular dreams go poof in the past year -- a new basketball arena, twin 53-story condominium towers -- but the ambitious expansion of the Crocker Art Museum is poised to become reality.

The city-owned Crocker breaks ground today on an $85 million expansion that will more than triple its size.

A courtyard will separate the two Victorian mansions that currently house the museum from a strikingly modern addition clad in white aluminum and gray zinc panels.

Museum staff members were buzzing with anticipation Wednesday as they ferried famed New York architect Charles Gwathmey around town to discuss his design.

First, the city will move Second Street to make way for the new building. Then, the concrete, 1960s-era Herold Wing will be torn down. Construction on the 125,000-square-foot addition is slated to begin in the fall.

"It's a really big deal for the city of Sacramento to build any museum, but to build a museum as significant as the Crocker is really outstanding," Mayor Heather Fargo said Wednesday. "The community has really stepped up."

Gwathmey, of Gwathmey Siegel & Associates, came to attend the festivities. Deeply tanned and dressed in a polo shirt, he threw a sport coat on for media appearances. Gwathmey has designed houses and apartments for celebrity clients such as Faye Dunaway, Steven Spielberg and David Geffen.

He also has done many library and museum projects around the country. He designed the addition to Frank Lloyd Wright's iconic Guggenheim Museum in New York. Recently, like other big-name architects, he's turned to designing high-rise condominium towers.

Gwathmey's modern addition to the Crocker, which features saw-toothed skylights on the roof, was blessed by the city's Design Review Board with minor changes.

Lial Jones, the museum director, said the idea of mixing old and new has generated little controversy. Times change, she said.

"Judge Crocker, when he built this building, built a piece of high-concept contemporary architecture," she said. "That's what we're doing now, and I think people understand that."

Gwathmey said he enjoys creating modern additions to historic structures. "It's great to engage in the history of architecture by commenting and extending its legacy," he said.

When working alongside the Italianate mansions built by Judge Edwin B. Crocker, Gwathmey said he sought to include elements that visually extended those in the originals.

The historic porches and balconies, for instance, are echoed in a curving porch on the two-story reception area of the new building. The new building will be the same height as the old ones.

Gwathmey said he chose white aluminum because it will work well with the light in Sacramento and because it echoes the Capitol a few blocks away.

Compared with other museum clients he has worked with, Gwathmey said, the Crocker fundraising effort is on a more solid fiscal footing as construction begins.

Between signed pledges and contributions from local and state governments, the Crocker has raised $82 million of the $100 million it is seeking to both fund the addition and boost its meager endowment.

Other museums typically break ground when they've raised only about half the money needed, said Jones, the Crocker's director.

The effort received a big boost in June when Arden Fair mall owners Mort and Marcy Friedman doubled their $5 million pledge, and the Joyce and Jim Teel Foundation -- funded by the Raley's grocery chain fortune -- raised its contribution from $8 million to $13 million.

"It was clearly the right thing to do," Marcy Friedman said in a phone interview Wednesday. "Sacramento needs this facility in order to stand up proud among all other cities."

Friedman, who has spent seven years co-chairing the fund drive, said she hopes it will establish a precedent under which the city's wealthy will start giving more to local causes.

"This city has long had a not-so-sterling reputation in terms of raising philanthropic dollars for anything," she said. "There's plenty of money in Sacramento; don't let anyone tell you there isn't. It's a matter of creating a culture and climate in which people feel proud to give up some of the money that came from their years of working in this city."

Once construction begins, Jones expects the donor base to expand dramatically as more people give smaller gifts. To date, 166 individuals and foundations have signed pledges to donate $63.5 million. The city of Sacramento has committed $12 million.

More money could come from the city's sale of Lot X, a parking lot near the museum. The city is currently seeking a buyer.

The museum addition will quadruple the space available at the Crocker for traveling exhibitions and will triple the display area for the permanent collection.

At the moment, the Crocker can show only 4 percent of its collection at any one time. And that collection keeps growing, Jones said.

In recent years, the museum has become a magnet for ceramics collectors looking to make significant donations. Recent additions include a collection of Asian ceramics dating from the 16th to the 18th century, and a collection of 18th- and 19th-century Meissen porcelain tableware from Germany.

"I predict by the time of the opening, we'll have the fourth-largest collection of ceramics in the United States," Jones said.


]

__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2007, 6:46 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
The tide is turning for river renaissance
Public, private projects lined up
By Deb Kollars - dkollars@sacbee.com
Last Updated 1:47 pm PST Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1
(Part 1 in an ongoing series of reports titled "Riverfront Rising")



For years and years, Sacramento's urban waterfront has been a ribbon of disappointment.

While cities across the nation have embraced the magic of water with spaces alive and appealing, we have settled for patches of weeds, old gray warehouses and empty slabs of concrete along the shores of the stately Sacramento River.

Look around the riverbend, however, and you will find a new waterfront rising: Riverside offices with views of the Capitol. The region's first condominium tower with balconies overlooking the water. A pair of new museums facing each other across the river. Shops and restaurants. Piers and marinas. Public promenades where people can gather.

All are being contemplated and designed, some with local muscle behind them, some with big national names.

Most are far from completion. Some may change or fade away. In every location, challenges remain, from securing levee safety to clearing industrial uses to waiting out a sagging housing market and tricky economy.

But for the first time in Sacramento's halting riverfront history, a series of projects with real plans, real backers and real timelines are lining up along the riverbanks in a collective sign of a renaissance.

To many, it is about time.

"I have been here 30 years," said Michael Glassman, a Sacramento landscape designer who is cohost of "Garden Police" on the Discovery Home Channel. "I have always been surprised at how little we've done with our waterfront."


A maturing market

The new focus along both sides of the river comes from converging forces, according to city planners and real estate experts. After years of suburban expansion, a maturing downtown market is drawing developers to the urban core. At the same time, the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento are taking steps to connect people to the river.

Much of the action is in West Sacramento, the upstart city on the western bank of the Sacramento River.

"It's kind of popped all at once," said West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon. "In every part of the river we've got things happening."

Just north of the Tower Bridge in West Sacramento, for example, the capital region's first waterfront high-rise condominium is being planned by a San Diego firm with a long history of delivering residential towers.

South of the condo site, local developer Mark Friedman is trying to lure a giant state office project to his property with architectural designs that play up the beauty and nearness of the water.

And in a dramatic turn, an area known as Stone Lock has emerged as a waterfront hot spot. Scrubby and obscure for years, the 200-acre site lies at a fortuitous point where the Port of Sacramento barge canal meets the Sacramento River.

This summer, that property – with its four miles of waterfront potential – captured the fancy of the Cordish Co., a Baltimore firm with a knack for splashy multimillion dollar entertainment zones. Among the places Cordish has put its mark: the Inner Harbor in Baltimore, Bayou Place in Houston and Fourth Street Live in Louisville, Ky.

Last week, the city of West Sacramento finalized an exclusive agreement with Cordish to begin planning and designing Stone Lock as its master developer. The document is scheduled to go before the City Council on Wednesday.

The goal is to create something the region has not seen: a modern neighborhood that celebrates the water. Among the possibilities are a central park and public plazas, restaurants and shopping and music venues, a marina on the barge canal, and a mix of housing and commercial spaces.

"If Cordish can do here what they've done in other places, this will be a major regional destination," said Traci Michel, West Sacramento's redevelopment program manager.


Underachieving spaces

If ever a waterfront could use a shot of life, it would be Sacramento's, on both sides of the river.

On a recent autumn evening in Old Sacramento, the sky was clear, the air warm, and the river a glistening palette of sunset colors.Yet at Rio City Cafe, an upscale restaurant with some of the best river views around, just half of the outdoor tables were filled. A lone couple walked on the floating dock below. Across the way, West Sacramento's landscaped promenade was empty. On the river, a single ski boat headed southward.

In nearby Waterfront Park, a plot of ground with a hopeful name and as much dirt as lawn, a group of Mexican folk dancers from Woodland performed for a small audience. The river was near, but largely hidden by buildings.

Melissa Verdugo, a historical interpreter who had helped organize the program, sighed as she surveyed the scarce crowd.

"We're trying," she said, ticking off a list of efforts by the Historic Old Sacramento Foundation. "But the scene here is pretty quiet. There's definitely a disconnect from the water."

That disconnect has been recognized for years. The Sacramento community sits at the confluence of two major rivers. One, the American, features a continuous natural parkway, enabling hundreds of thousands of people a year to enjoy its beauty, wildlife and seasonal moods.

The other, the Sacramento, runs past the heart of the downtown core. Yet, apart from the few blocks occupied by the Old Sacramento historic district and brief promenades, scant options exist in the downtown area for people to gather and enjoy the Sacramento River.

Even where there are opportunities, few venture near.

Miller Park, for example, is one of the prettiest and best-maintained parks in the region. It stretches for a half mile along the Sacramento River south of downtown, where Broadway ends. This time of year, the park is luminous as the cottonwoods turn yellow against the changing skies.

The dream for Miller Park is to stand as a shining exclamation point at the southernmost end of the urban waterfront. But for now, it requires a leap of faith just to get there – past a rail line, oil tanks and warehouses.


Longtime challenges

Such barriers have long undermined dreams of developing Sacramento's waterfront.

The railyard area north of downtown, for example, is burdened by a toxic past. A railroad spur in the "Triangle" area of West Sacramento and a water treatment reservoir in the "Docks" area of Sacramento have blocked progress for years in these two prime waterfront regions.

Concerns about levee safety and flooding also have slowed efforts to add amenities next to the water. The levees themselves form a physical barrier, rising higher than the land and blocking views and access.

Most intractable of all is the monolithic Interstate 5 running parallel to the river, cutting off Sacramento's downtown from the water. Sacramento City Manager Ray Kerridge called it "a terrible, terrible thing to do to a city."

Numerous cities have overcome similar obstacles to transform their once-industrial waterfronts. They offer restaurants, shops and aquariums. Crowds on the piers and plazas. Boating life. Commercial life. Night life.

In the 1970s, Portland moved a freeway to open waterfront space on the Willamette River, and has been adding parks, skyscrapers and restaurants ever since.

More recently, Chicago transformed a blighted railyard near Lake Michigan into the spectacular Millennium Park, where architecture, gardens and entertainment attract millions every year.

Pittsburgh, meanwhile, has turned grim stretches where steel mills once reigned into 30 miles of continuous river access, complete with public waterfalls and fountains that beckon children to jump in and play.

In Pittsburgh, waterfront revitalization was a huge job, according to Tom Murphy, a senior fellow with the Urban Land Institute and a former Pittsburgh mayor. It involved cleaning up not just the land but the water.

"When I was growing up in Pittsburgh, our mothers always told us two things: Get home before the street lights come on and never go near the rivers because they were so dirty," Murphy recalled. "Now they are a place of magic for people."

Murphy visited Sacramento earlier this year to speak at a conference on levees. He was stunned by the beauty of the mountain-fed Sacramento River, and by the lack of development at its edges.


"I was overwhelmed by the amount of riverfront and the greenness and softness of the landscape," he said. "You have great potential for your waterfront. You just haven't put it together yet."


Charting a new course

In California, major coastal cities such as San Francisco and San Diego have had natural advantages in developing waterfront communities and tourist attractions. It was bound to take inland cities such as Sacramento longer, said Greg Paquin, president of the Gregory Group, a Folsom real estate consulting firm.

"We're getting to that point now," he said. "We're maturing in a number of ways."

A sign of that maturing came four years ago, when the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento overcame a competitive pattern to create the joint waterfront master plan, "Celebrating Our River."

Now, both cities are working on a critical feature of that plan – creating longer and more lively river promenades with bikeways, walking paths, lookouts and public plazas. They are using the same Portland landscape architecture firm, Walker Macy, and the cities' planners are helping each other navigate flood control issues.

In addition, the two cities finally have launched the widening of the Tower Bridge to make it easier for people to walk or bicycle back and forth – something West Sacramento's Mayor Cabaldon and Joe Serna Jr., the late mayor of Sacramento, agreed to years ago.

"Ten years and $13 million later, it's finally getting done," Cabaldon said.

At the same time, private developers are being driven not only by the demographic shift toward downtown living but also by the two cities' clearer vision for developing the waterfront, said Mike McKeever, executive director of the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, which monitors the pulse of regional growth.

"We're all sensing it," Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo said. "There is a momentum under way that we haven't seen before."


The eastern edge


On the Sacramento side, an ambitious project called Township 9 is being heralded as a catalyst for Sacramento River waterfront development.

The 65-acre project, approved by the City Council in August, sits next to the American River near its confluence with the Sacramento. Plans call for transforming the industrial area into a neighborhood with housing, shopping and offices. Land nearest the river is envisioned as a parkway.

Construction is set to begin in a year, and people should be living there within two years, said Steve Goodwin, president of Capitol Station 65, the owner and developer of Township 9.

Nearby, Thomas Enterprises, the owner-developer of the former Union Pacific railyard north of downtown, is hoping for City Council approval in December of a large urban neighborhood. Eventually, it is to include a waterfront stretch featuring park space, a possible marina and hotel, and other commercial or office uses.

To the south, a wedge of promising waterfront property known as the Docks finally has a heartbeat, after more than 30 years of planning and waiting. KSWM Docks Partners, the team from San Francisco that is developing Treasure Island, has an exclusive negotiating agreement with the city of Sacramento to buy and develop the Docks site.

Many challenges remain for the Docks, with the first construction at least three years away because of the tough housing market. But according to KSWM's principals, the team is committed.

"We feel absolutely convinced we made the right decision putting our toe in the water," said Todd Saunders, a partner with Wilson Meany Sullivan, a real estate development firm that is part of the KSWM team.


West Sacramento

Across the river, signs of progress already are visible near the pyramid-shaped ziggurat building in the northern end of West Sacramento's waterfront. There, a high-rise office tower is going up, the future home of the State Teachers' Retirement System.

In between the office tower and the ziggurat, plans call for something many waterside cities take for granted: high-rise condos.


The housing slump is expected to delay by at least two years the construction of the condo tower by Fairfield Residential LLC of San Diego. But designs are proceeding, with the project slated to go before the West Sacramento City Council sometime this winter.

Though waterfront condos and offices are common sights, what the city and the Cordish Co. have in mind for the Stone Lock area is far from typical.

Three years ago, a modern entertainment district was the last thing anyone was thinking about, said Val Toppenberg, West Sacramento's director of redevelopment. The city had bought a chunk of property from the Port of Sacramento to help bail it out of a deficit. Soon after, the city acquired more property nearby from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Last summer, city leaders tallied the acreage they had amassed – 200 acres in all.

"I thought, my goodness, there is a huge opportunity here," Toppenberg said. He and his staff studied waterfront developments across the country and invited some of the nation's top firms, including the Cordish Co., to bid for a chance to become master developer.

"We thought, 'Who cares if we're this little city on the wrong side of the river,' " Toppenberg said. "We didn't want a subdivision. We wanted a really cool project."

If the City Council approves terms of the Cordish agreement on Wednesday, the firm will have a year and a half to plan the project, complete environmental reviews and gain entitlements. Given the size and scale of the effort, Michel said, it will take at least a decade to complete.

The Triangle area, home to Raley Field, may go vertical even sooner, now that the railroad spur that has long hampered growth is coming out. Moving the tracks – and a cement plant that relies on them – involved years of negotiations and a $16.5 million package of investments by the city and private developers.

On a recent afternoon, Davis developer Lynne Yackzan stood on a barren waterfront parcel in the Triangle that her family has owned and dreamed of developing for years.

"It's this gem, this little Emerald City about to happen," she said. "The rails are coming out. We can finally move forward."

The rail spur's imminent departure helped push Triangle developer Mark Friedman into action over the past two months.

Friedman hopes to win a state contract to build a complex for the California Resources Agency, now located in downtown Sacramento. To help make his case, he brought in some big guns, including Hines, one of the world's largest skyscraper developers, and Pickard Chilton, a noted architectural firm.

Competition to gain the 1.4 million square feet of office space is stiff, however. Sacramento city leaders are fighting hard to keep the agency within city limits.

"We want that million-four square feet in the city of Sacramento," Kerridge said, "and we're going to get it."

Friedman, however, is offering an amenity other proposals can't match: views and access to one of the very treasures the Resources Agency oversees – the Sacramento River.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2007, 6:50 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
West Sacramento says yes to waterfront dream
Riverfront Rising: An ongoing series on the future of the Sacramento River
By Deb Kollars - dkollars@sacbee.com.
Published 12:00 am PST Thursday, November 8, 2007
Story appeared in METRO section, Page B1
(Part 2 of an ongoing series of reports titled "Riverfront Rising")

With the West Sacramento City Council's blessing Wednesday, the dreaming now begins for Stone Lock, an unusual area on the Sacramento River with an old lock, beautiful views and four miles of waterfront potential.

The council gave unanimous approval to an agreement with the Cordish Co. of Baltimore to develop the 200-acre site.

"The possibilities are really endless," said City Councilman Bill Kristoff. "This is going to be: hold on to your seats, folks."

Located across from Miller Park and the Miller Park Marina, the Stone Lock property includes an unused portion of the barge canal where it meets the Sacramento River. The agreement kicks off a year and a half of planning, environmental reviews and design work for the site, now owned by the city.

"The next phase is all about the dreaming," said Cordish Vice President Blake Cordish in a telephone interview. "It's a very unique piece of property. This is a huge palette to paint on."

In particular, the lock – a nonfunctioning structure of concrete and steel once used to regulate water levels for vessels – has city leaders and the Cordish Co. pondering the possibilities: Could it become a tourist attraction? A demonstration lock? A luxury spa with an elegant pool? What about sinking an old ship and creating a deepwater diving school?

"There are a million ideas, and they're all kind of wild," said Val Toppenberg, West Sacramento's redevelopment director.

"This is the fun part," Cordish agreed.

Wednesday's "exclusive negotiation agreement" essentially is a land contract, Toppenberg said. It enables the Cordish Co. to begin spending money on planning with the understanding that the firm will be able to buy the property, or portions of it, and start developing it at the end of the agreement's 18-month duration. Some of the land may become public city park space.

"It allows everyone to have a degree of comfort that people are spending money on something that will result in a real project," Toppenberg said.

The agreement calls for the Cordish Co. to complete market analyses, take the lead in planning the site, solicit public comment and secure entitlements and environmental reviews. Costs, estimated at $2 million, are to be borne by the developer.

At Wednesday's meeting, several residents raised concerns about flood safety and the density of the development and urged the council to proceed carefully.

"Our levees aren't up to snuff, especially in that whole area of South River Road," said Dani Langford, a Southport homeowner.

The Cordish Co. has named as its development director Port Telles, an attorney from West Sacramento who has been working as senior project manager for Granite Land Co.

The Cordish Co. had been selected in July as Stone Lock's master developer through a competitive process.

The development drew widespread attention because of the size of the property, its long waterfront stretches and its ownership by the city, said Traci Michel, West Sacramento's redevelopment program director. Ten proposals were submitted by local and national firms, including Cordish.

The Cordish Co. was chosen because of its reputation for building splashy entertainment zones in other cities such as Louisville, Ky.; Charleston, S.C.; and Tampa, Fla. The firm played a prominent role in revitalizing Baltimore's Inner Harbor.

Developing near water, Blake Cordish said Wednesday, is one of his company's favorite things to do.

"It's magical," he said. "In Baltimore, it has become the thread that has tied everything together."

Though it is too early to say what Stone Lock will include, the firm plans to follow several key principles, Cordish said.

Among them: Bringing the riverfront to life; preserving public spaces near the water's edges; including local, national and international architects and experts in the design process; and drawing on the desires of local residents.

The area will be different from other waterfront development areas in the city, Toppenberg said. For example, the Raley's Landing stretch is slated to become an area of high density, tall buildings and heavy office uses.

Stone Lock will not emphasize high-rise office uses but rather recreation, entertainment, restaurants, shops and outdoor spaces for people to gather and enjoy the scenery.

The current housing slump and difficult economy are not expected to be a barrier to development, Cordish said.

"We have such a long-term perspective," he said. "We absolutely believe that for the long term, this is a wonderful opportunity."
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2007, 6:51 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,083
It's great to see all the progress in West Sac. Good Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 3:52 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
@ 9th and L street
Height: 150'
15 story office building
(or alternative proposal for)
13 story residential mid rise
173 residential units, ground floor retail and onsite parking.
Status: Pedning before the Design Review Board





Current structure to be be demolished.


Office


Office


Office


Residential

Origionally posted by innov8 in the Sacramento forum
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio

Last edited by urban_encounter; Dec 28, 2007 at 2:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2007, 6:16 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
^
I think its on 9th or 10th and L
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2007, 2:42 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistola916 View Post
^
I think its on 9th or 10th and L
You're right Pistola916, thanks for the correction...

15th and L is the Marriott..
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2007, 7:56 AM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,098
Glad to see so much potential for the city - I just hope that the city leaders let this happen, and that the developers see it as profitable.

I'd love to drive over 80 and see massive downtown in the distance :-)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2007, 4:39 AM
westcoastperspective westcoastperspective is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,557
9th and L: My vote is for residential*

*after a re-design
__________________
www.BuffaloRising.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2007, 5:04 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
Exactly my position, WCP. Residential with the office design would look great.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2008, 4:38 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltsmotorsport View Post
Exactly my position, WCP. Residential with the office design would look great.
Yeah for crying out loud somebody (ANYBODY) has to get at least one residential building u/c in the CBD.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2008, 5:43 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Downtown/Midtown

East End Gateway
Sites II and III @ 16th and O Street
Developer: Ravel Rasmussen Properties
Architect: Chang Partners
Site II: 4 Stories, 24 Apartments, 4900 sf retail
Site III: 5 Stores, 60 Apartment, 7100 sf retail
Status: Approved with construction start July 2008


(origionally posted by Sugit in the Sacramento sub forum)
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2008, 5:48 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
East End Gateway
Site 1 @ 16th and N street
15 Stories
125 residential units
3,450sf ground floor retail








(origionally posted by Sugit in the Sacramento sub forum)
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio

Last edited by urban_encounter; Jan 28, 2008 at 6:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2008, 4:06 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
R Street Corridor

[/QUOTE]

@ 1409 R street
12 residential lofts above reastaurant/bar which may include:
sake lounge and Japanese restaurant
"modern & hip" Hof Brau
bistro
coffee house
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2008, 6:18 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,201
The East End Gateway Site 1 project looks pretty good. I'm not a big fan of the faux Mission style of Sites 2 and 3 though.

And is 1409 R an existing building that's being redeveloped?
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2008, 4:06 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,088
In the summer of 06 my family and I went to British Columbia, and on the way up north, we went through Sacramento......beautiful city.

Sighh, lots of trees!
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2008, 5:27 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
The East End Gateway Site 1 project looks pretty good. I'm not a big fan of the faux Mission style of Sites 2 and 3 though. And is 1409 R an existing building that's being redeveloped?
That stretch of 16th street is really going to be a defining corrdior as it bisects the Downtown and Midtown areas. I guess i'm indifferent to the Mission style neither being overly thrilled or offended by it. It's the appropriate scale for that street height wise and I'm more interested in the mix of rental and for sale units and especially the ground floor retail, so it will be a welcome sight.

1409 R street is an old building along the old R street rail tracks. I drove by it yesterday and it appears that they're gutting it now..



Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
In the summer of 06 my family and I went to British Columbia, and on the way up north, we went through Sacramento......beautiful city.

Sighh, lots of trees!
It's easy to fall in love with the trees here and makes the Spring and Autumns beautiful and the Summer's (with that delta breeze in the evenings) bearable.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio

Last edited by urban_encounter; Mar 2, 2008 at 5:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.