Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46
I'm curious if the IOC ever ends up with egg on their face when no one will host. Literally no one. They've come close a couple of times, but somebody's always stepped up to the plate.
I'd wager that it might be worth it to 'lose' an Olympic Games just to remind the IOC of their dependence on the generosity of host nations.
Good for Vancouver IMO.
|
The remaining bids for 2030 are Sapporo and Salt Lake City. IOC's not concerned.
If anything, having all three of these hosts shows where the IOC's priorities are regarding hosting future events. All three are previous hosts and can use, to varying degrees, previous facilities. This is a large cost-saving factor in future bids and partly why Paris and Los Angeles were also chosen to host. It's clear the IOC understands the environment they're currently operating in and have made changes to their host selection formula. Both FIFA and IOC made significant blunders in the early 2000s/2010s in selecting hosts which since, hopefully, have been remedied.
I understand why BC would drop out of hosting but I think the complaints of cost of hosting are overblown given that many are cutting costs by returning to previous venues. See: Beijing as the most recent example. If anything, a lot of the high costs are due to security requirements, which in our post-9/11 world are required regardless.