HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


View Poll Results: What is the most compelling UBC project or proposal?
University Town 34 31.48%
University Boulevard 34 31.48%
Museum of Anthropology Expansion 12 11.11%
UBC Winter Sports Centre 11 10.19%
Irving K. Barber Learning Centre 7 6.48%
Sauder School of Business building redevelopment 10 9.26%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2010, 3:54 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,186
Crap, thats awesome. Bing Thom has my vote. I'm quite a fan of the central city complex, and the detail they put in is pretty spectacular.

I've been going to through the videos. Missed the presentations due to a large amount of crap I have to do.

Regarding the HBBH knoll proposal, I would almost vote to have the Knoll demoed out of spite. I wouldn't mind rebuilding something similar on the roof, but the protectionist attitude behind saving the knoll is something I'd love to see defeated.

I'm kind of disappointed by Henriquez though, their video didn't really address UBC much, which is a shame considering they're behind a couple of my favourite buildings in Van.

Anyways I voted:

Bing Thom
Bunting Coady
Henriquez
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2010, 4:12 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
It's certainly getting better, and UBC Planning realizes they need to begin integrating plans and developing a campus plan that reflects the values of the stakeholders.
Sorry for the double post, but I just noticed this bit.

There's a fair bit of bad blood between C+CP and the students mostly because this has largely been an issue before. C+CP has a lot of consultation in prior years, especially considering the U-boulevard development. The thing is this feedback really didn't go anywhere and wasn't reflected in the recommendations supposedly made from the feedback. This left a lot of students feeling like the entire consultation was used to lend legitimacy to a prefab plan with prefab consultation results. I'm not 100% up on the details, but Carne or Darren Peets would be good people to bug on the subject.

Weather or not this is true or not, I don't think a lot of people interested in this project would trust C+CP with managing any form of planning on a building as important to students as the sub. I know I sure wouldn't.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2010, 8:23 AM
andcarne andcarne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
The results on the AMS Architect Selection vote are out and the three firms are (in no particular order):
  • Bing Thom
  • Busby, Perkins + Will
  • HBBH+BH

I'm quite pleased, as these were the three firms I chose. I can't wait to hear more details about their individual proposals, and see which is chosen in the end.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2010, 8:28 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Great choices. I'm a little bit surprised Busby won over Henriquz, but I'm not complaining about it either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2010, 4:32 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Results are in: HBBH+BH is the official architect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2010, 1:38 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
AMS Announces New SUB Architect Firm!

In early May, over 2400 students participated in the NEW SUB Architect Vote and selected three finalists. The Alma Mater Society of UBC Vancouver (AMS) is thrilled to announce that HBBH + BH is the successful architect firm for the NEW SUB Project pending negotiation completion.

Selection criteria included: sustainability (LEED Platinum certification experience and Living Building Challenge components), iconic design and functionality. HBBH + BH has vast experience with educational buildings and urban design.

Ekaterina Dovjenko, AMS VP Administration, said “The AMS is confident that HBBH + BH is the right firm and demonstrated that they have a deep understanding of students’ needs.”

Bijan Ahmadian, AMS President, added “I know that HBBH + BH will design an iconic building and deliver a robust student engagement program throughout the design process.”

Schematic design with students will begin in September 2010. To ensure students are engaged in the process, the AMS and HBBH + BH will be running a series of workshops and charettes on topics such as student life, sustainability, student social spaces and green spaces.

The New SUB will be 255,000 sq ft and is scheduled to open in 2014. The AMS will be contributing $78 million dollars of the $103 million needed to fund this innovative, student-centered project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2010, 4:23 PM
andcarne andcarne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Sweet. September's going to be a lot of fun. HBBH+BH definitely sounded like the best firm for student engagement (from their presentation and submissions), so I'm excited that they were chosen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2010, 8:42 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
great! so do the knollers like this or dislike it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2010, 11:10 PM
andcarne andcarne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by flight_from_kamakura View Post
great! so do the knollers like this or dislike it?
They seem to have quietly withered away. At least from the public view.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2010, 5:56 AM
Rusty Gull's Avatar
Rusty Gull Rusty Gull is offline
Site 8 Lives
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver's North Shore
Posts: 1,285
Don't worry, they'll be back. They just got distracted by UBC Farm for a couple of years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2010, 7:20 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,186
The thing is every 4 years theres a complete turnover over of people. So who knows, the majority of the knollies could be off bugging people over something else, somewhere else.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2010, 7:25 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
The thing is every 4 years theres a complete turnover over of people. So who knows, the majority of the knollies could be off bugging people over something else, somewhere else.
The demonstrators had intended to hold the unit for 674 minutes, “to symbolize each unit that is being sold off that was promised as affordable housing in the official development plan,” VanAct organizer Tristan Markle told The Province.

Read more: http://www.theprovince.com/health/Ac...#ixzz0uCmXxLdL


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2010, 12:47 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,027
From a Globe & Mail article linked in another thread by whatnext:

The Musqueam may develop a new Marriott Hotel at UBC.

Quote:
The band has a large asset base outside of the reserve, much of which was acquired through the reconciliation agreement they made with the province in 2007, which gave them the 59-hectare University Golf Course and an eight-hectare parcel of land adjacent to it.

They now have a 15-year plan to develop the parcel, starting with a hotel in the next year or so. The Marriott chain, which has built about 60 hotels on campuses throughout the United States, has shown interest, Mr. Charters says.

If the community consultation gives the green light, the project – worth about $200-million to the Musqueam – will follow with office buildings, rental apartments and 99-year prepaid-lease condos and townhouses that will use the same lease agreement model that the University of British Columbia currently uses.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-...rticle1670904/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2010, 11:18 PM
andcarne andcarne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The Musqueam may develop a new Marriott Hotel at UBC.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-...rticle1670904/

Anyone know where exactly this 8-ha parcel of land is? I was under the impression that the only transfer was the Golf Course, and a quick perusal of Google Maps has left me somewhat confused as to where this would go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2010, 12:32 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by andcarne View Post
Anyone know where exactly this 8-ha parcel of land is? I was under the impression that the only transfer was the Golf Course, and a quick perusal of Google Maps has left me somewhat confused as to where this would go.
My guess would be the area near the church(?)
Here's a Pacific Spirit Park map - so the 8 ha would have to be outside the park (assuming that the map is accurate) - the church area looks like the only area? The area to the north that not in the park is single family homes.

http://www.metrovancouver.org/about/...cspiritmap.pdf

Last edited by officedweller; Aug 17, 2010 at 12:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2010, 7:43 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,027
From News1130:

Quote:
UBC approves biomass plant
First of its kind in North America

Richard Dettman
Aug 17, 2010 11:01:37 AM

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - Vancouver-based Nexterra Systems has signed a contract with the UBC for a heat-and-power system that will run on biomass. Nexterra says it will be the first installation of its kind in North America, set to start operating in late 2011.

The system will convert urban wood waste into combustible synthetic gas using the company's technology. The gas will power an engine that will produce two megawatts of electricity while its waste heat will be recovered to make steam for heating.

Nexterra says the steam will offset about 15 per cent of the natural gas currently used for campus heating. It predicts UBC's greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by 4,000 tonnes per year while an unspecified amount of wood waste will be diverted from the landfill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2010, 7:15 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Metro, UBC clash over housing plan to create campus town of 51,000
Plan to have 51,000 people living on campus in the next 20 years raises concerns about roads, transit

By Kelly Sinoski, Vancouver Sun October 16, 2010 12:05 AM

VANCOUVER - Metro Vancouver is balking at a radical plan by the University of B.C. to build more market housing and turn the campus into a town of 51,000 people over the next two decades, warning the move will put more pressure on the region’s roads, transit and other infrastructure.

A Metro Vancouver staff report suggests the move is not in the regional interest, and urges UBC to scale back the proposal, which calls for a substantial boost in affordable and market housing to attract "excellent faculty and students from around the world," and increase the non-student population on campus to up to 35,000 by 2021 from 6,410 today.

The move — part of the first official review of UBC’s Land Use Plan since 2003 — is aimed at turning the 405-hectare (1,000-acre) Vancouver campus from a commuter campus into a self-sufficient community with shops, services and transit.

The university argues UBC is located in "some of the most expensive real estate in Canada" and more market housing is needed. About 50 per cent of students and 25 per cent of faculty live on campus now.

"What we’re looking at is building a sustainable community; a place where people can live, work, study and shop without getting in a car and driving to the city," said Stephen Owen, UBC’s vice-president for external, legal, and community relations.

"UBC is very confident that we’re creating something of a really important model here."

UBC unveiled its amended land use plan this summer, shortly after the provincial government enacted legislation in June that transferred the responsibility for the university’s local land use planning from Metro Vancouver to the minister of community and rural development.

Metro is still responsible for regional growth issues at UBC, which is part of Electoral Area A, under the B.C. Local Government Act. UBC residents on long-term leases or private property pay property taxes to the province but sewage and water taxes to Metro.

As part of the proposed changes, the university wants to retain the UBC farm to support teaching and research on campus, boost its financial endowment funds and foster a pedestrian village with shops and services at University Square.

But Metro worries the university is moving too fast.

Metro chief administrative officer Johnny Carline said while the regional district supports UBC’s general plan for a "balanced university town," he’s worried they want to build more high-end market housing for the public at the expense of student accommodation.

This could pose serious problems for Pacific Spirit Park, the city of Vancouver and the regional district as a whole, especially if people are commuting from UBC to other areas to work or there isn’t enough green space left on campus, the report said.

"A significant increase in market housing, which will undoubtedly be ‘high end’ in terms of price, may benefit the university financially, but this may equally increase the pressure for costly public infrastructure investment," the report states.

"This is not consistent with regional growth plans or the regional interest."

The report, which was discussed by the Electoral Area A committee Friday, calls on UBC to re-examine its plan to "increase the supply of on-campus student housing and decrease the amount of pure market housing." It also seeks height regulations to address concerns about the visual impact of development on Pacific Spirit Park.

Metro Vancouver also has obtained a ministerial order requiring UBC to submit its regional context statement to Metro before submitting a new land use plan to the minister.

Vancouver Coun. Suzanne Anton, who sits on the committee, said the members didn’t want to give a view one way or the other on UBC’s plans. The committee did, however, pass a motion to ask UBC for clarity on the population numbers and how many residents might still have to commute off-campus.

"One of the interesting things about UBC is it has always been out there on the point, [separate] from the city," said Anton. "This is a radical new proposal to turn UBC into a town in its own right."

Carline said Metro is "just raising the flag," noting the regional district hasn’t been given many details about how much student housing is specifically planned or what the market housing costs or controls are predicted to be.

"The concern is UBC should be as self-contained as possible," he said. "The more student housing there is, the less transit pressure there will be to UBC. If we’re interpreting the land use [plan] correctly, it will increase the pressures on the transit system rather than decrease it."

Vancouver Coun. Tim Stevenson, who sits on the Metro committee, said he was surprised at how much density is planned for UBC. "There’s no doubt this is disconcerting for us," he said. "There are concerns about how that’s going to affect Vancouver ... the traffic flows in and out will be huge and what does that mean for transit? It certainly has sent off alarm bells and red flags."

Owen said he envisions most people on campus will be students and faculty and won’t be travelling from Surrey or Delta to get to the university. Yet he said he was disappointed that a rapid transit line to UBC is not among the region’s priorities, which cite the Evergreen Line, an extension to the Surrey SkyTrain and the Central Broadway line as the top transit projects for the region.

Owen noted the number of transit trips to UBC increased from 19,000 trips in 1997 to nearly 60,000 trips last year, making the university the second-largest transit destination outside the downtown core.

"The real concern we’ve got now is ridership is about 100,000 people a day," Owen said.

"It’s financially viable right from the start."

But Carline noted Surrey is expected to grow by 250,000 people and add another 150,000 workers — figures that "dwarf anything happening at UBC" and he doesn’t want UBC’s plans to overshadow what’s needed elsewhere.

Carline noted he never envisioned UBC as an urban centre. The Official Community Plan for UBC adopted by the Metro board in 1997, for instance, cited a target population of 18,000 by 2021, including students in residence.

Owen argued UBC has already been deemed a "living laboratory" for the province and university officials want to capitalize on that as well as UBC’s distinction of being in the top 30 universities.

"Certainly the revenue that comes from market housing development is going into the endowment fund to support the academic mission and research," he said. UBC generates combined economic benefits of more than $10 billion a year.

"It’s all happening at UBC. It’s a little curious that the model community is being left out of regional growth planning."

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz12VI8eaT3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2010, 9:27 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Ah... an entertaining debate about UBC vs Surrey priorities.

I have to say... Surrey may be booming, but is there strong demand for transit down there? I'm not positively sure. =S I think there's still room to add to the FTN plus a few peak-hour express routes before we even need to build a BRT system. On the other hand UBC just really needs something to get rid of overcrowding on the buses on almost all the east-west routes.

From a planning perspective, well... I don't see significant issues on the condition (again) that SkyTrain gets built in the first place. Having said that, I have bad thoughts about the possible predominance of "high-end priced units" as that would not relieve one of the region's problems: the lack of affordable housing near the city centres.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2010, 10:10 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
This is precisely why I have been mentioning and advocating for a new Metro Vancouver Regional Strategy. UBC isn't the only example of a place where its plans conflict the current regional strategy, Richmond is another fine example where growth has exceeded what was expected. A new plan that works with the plans of municipalities, identifying and classifying key regional centres, municipal centres and upcoming municipal centres, as well as community hubs and upcoming community hubs, needs to be in place. Our growth strategy, planning, and transportation strategy then revolves around these plans, identifying important projects and potentially dictating the capacity of transit infrastructure for the route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2010, 3:34 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,373
Good on UBC, the other cities are continuously ignoring the Metro plan when it's in their convenience. Not surprised that Vancouver doesn't like increased traffic cutting thru it to get to somewhere else, ask New West about that.

Increasing the population to 51K will certainly help justify RRT all the way onto campus. It will greatly help translink too with providing trips in the opposite direction during rush hour, so increased ridership using the same capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.