HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2023, 5:17 PM
Glenn99 Glenn99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
CF is a blue chip company, and in the local context, so is Shindico. They have the expertise, and more importantly, the means to get it done.

If it was Sandhu Developments or whatever then yeah, you would be right to be skeptical. But these developers are legit. A project like this is just another development for a company like CF. I suspect they have done their homework with regard to such things as sewer lines, etc.
Isn't CF doing similar developments in Vancouver and Toronto already?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2023, 5:40 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Vancouver is the only one I'm specifically aware of, but I would imagine they must be doing this across the country, or at least they must have plans to that effect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2023, 7:14 PM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Posts: 1,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn99 View Post
Isn't CF doing similar developments in Vancouver and Toronto already?
They’re redeveloping Fairview with a bunch of high rises.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2023, 5:02 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,025
A mall in Montreal is getting the same treatment (can’t remember the name).
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2023, 9:51 PM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
CF is a blue chip company, and in the local context, so is Shindico. They have the expertise, and more importantly, the means to get it done.

If it was Sandhu Developments or whatever then yeah, you would be right to be skeptical. But these developers are legit. A project like this is just another development for a company like CF. I suspect they have done their homework with regard to such things as sewer lines, etc.
That's reassuring.

I'm all for redevelopment and all things built, but I've been disappointed before on numerous occasions in the past. The optimist in me isn't what it used to be.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2023, 10:40 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,799
I remember when the Forks announced Railside like 10 years ago lulz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 3:20 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebasketballgeek View Post
Wrong, wrong, and wrong.

The BRT expansion plan calls for the Portage line to go all the way to the Red River Ex which is adjacent to Westport. The blue line of course stretches all the way to U of M so most transit needs are met.

Secondly, a Costco is planned as the main anchor tenant for the Westport Development. If not Costco then it’s going to be some other 100k sq ft grocery store. With all the commercial lots amenities and services will be plentiful. With the Iceplex, Downs, and Ex residents there will get more amenities within walking distance then most Winnipeggers.

Finally, there are plans for an AT path on the main road (race track rd). And let’s not be fooled the city can absolutely add cycling facilities on Perimeter interchanges. They’ve already done it with Pembina, and they plan to add bike lanes on the new St. Mary’s interchange. Being close to the interchange will have no effect on whether they can or can’t build an AT path on that stretch of Portage.
This is actually pretty laughable from your complete misunderstanding of the area.

1. The Costco plan is currently not proceeding. There was reportedly misinformation between the city and the developer on the type of pipes that site would need. The result is the pipe was put in as planned but is undersized for Costco. Costco will walk before picking up the cost and the developer is prepared to eat those costs either.

2. As is today the Portage Ave overpass has three lanes each direction. With the plan the change it from a coverleaf to a diverging diamond traffic on Portage Ave will get significantly worse and it was already a close second to the busiest spot on the Perimeter before. Keep in mind when this plan happens semis will need to exist the northbound flow and proceed under the Portage Ave underpass. This means any BRT from Charlewood to about Race Track Rd is going to have to be merged into the general traffic flow. That is without even getting into that the east/Transcona BRT is the second in the project and is heavily stalled in red tape. Further, for anyone dreaming of LRT, that diverging diamond on the roadway makes it a hard no.

3. Re AT to/from WestPort. Hard reality there is outside of any residential which may be built on the WestPort site there is near zero demand in destination or origin for AT to WestPort and what little there is would likely use transit if serviced the area. Talking with a former councilor for the area they pointed out that at one time transit had studied service to the Hockey For All (formerly named IcePlex) facility. They found not surprisingly the people attended the facility most arrived in private passenger vehicles with large bags of hockey equipment.

4. As for the fabled grocery store, Sobeys just renovated both their Safeway and Sobeys stores not far from the site. Weston operates a No Frills just south of the site on Roblin and a full line Superstore east of the site on Portage Ave. I guess it is possible Save-On-Foods or Co-Op might open at the site but I think both those are a long shot. Sort of too bad the planned Super Target didn't happen on the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 4:05 PM
Luisito's Avatar
Luisito Luisito is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinCitySparky View Post
I remember when the Forks announced Railside like 10 years ago lulz
What happened to that project???
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 4:27 PM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Posts: 1,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
This is actually pretty laughable from your complete misunderstanding of the area.

1. The Costco plan is currently not proceeding. There was reportedly misinformation between the city and the developer on the type of pipes that site would need. The result is the pipe was put in as planned but is undersized for Costco. Costco will walk before picking up the cost and the developer is prepared to eat those costs either.

2. As is today the Portage Ave overpass has three lanes each direction. With the plan the change it from a coverleaf to a diverging diamond traffic on Portage Ave will get significantly worse and it was already a close second to the busiest spot on the Perimeter before. Keep in mind when this plan happens semis will need to exist the northbound flow and proceed under the Portage Ave underpass. This means any BRT from Charlewood to about Race Track Rd is going to have to be merged into the general traffic flow. That is without even getting into that the east/Transcona BRT is the second in the project and is heavily stalled in red tape. Further, for anyone dreaming of LRT, that diverging diamond on the roadway makes it a hard no.

3. Re AT to/from WestPort. Hard reality there is outside of any residential which may be built on the WestPort site there is near zero demand in destination or origin for AT to WestPort and what little there is would likely use transit if serviced the area. Talking with a former councilor for the area they pointed out that at one time transit had studied service to the Hockey For All (formerly named IcePlex) facility. They found not surprisingly the people attended the facility most arrived in private passenger vehicles with large bags of hockey equipment.

4. As for the fabled grocery store, Sobeys just renovated both their Safeway and Sobeys stores not far from the site. Weston operates a No Frills just south of the site on Roblin and a full line Superstore east of the site on Portage Ave. I guess it is possible Save-On-Foods or Co-Op might open at the site but I think both those are a long shot. Sort of too bad the planned Super Target didn't happen on the site.
I had no idea that the Costco fiasco. My apologies I misspoke, but damn the city really dropped the ball on that.

Although, the Diverging Diamond planned for Portage is the “ultimate” design there is an intermediate upgrade on Portage/Perimeter that calls too add AT lanes on the existing cloverleaf which will probably look like the one on Pembina. As someone who has cycled on that route I surprisingly didn’t feel like my life was in imminent danger. Who knows when the final design will be built, but hopefully they can figure out a way to include AT facilities.

Finally, while I doubt that there would be separate transit infrastructure west of perimeter, it really just needs to be dedicated ROW starting in Unicity for people who will live in Westport to start benefitting from it. Of course with the clientile that will likely live in Westport transit won’t be a priority, but it’ll be nice to have those 5-10 minute headways during rush hour. And even though there isn’t much existing demand for transit in the area I believe that having transit out to the Ex during its season would be a nice amenity to have for the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted May 1, 2023, 1:33 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Does anyone know whether there has been any movement on the Polo Park project lately?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 1:36 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,266
there seems to be a lot going on in the mall itself with stores shuffling and new openings at least.
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 1:40 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
there seems to be a lot going on in the mall itself with stores shuffling and new openings at least.
Stores being shuffled around at Polo Park seems to be a fairly regular thing. I would guess that somewhere in the lease agreements they require store overhauls say every five years. When there is open space they seem to allow existing tenants to move to a new space rather than renovating their current space. Take HMV as an example, it had at least three different spots in the mall before in permanently closed. And it is just one example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 1:48 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Does anyone know whether there has been any movement on the Polo Park project lately?
With the current construction cost climate my bets are on a big nothing burger for the next half decade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 8:59 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,956
My guess would be that unless there is a major lead tenant the initial Polo Park developments will initially happen on the site that previously had the stadium but I would be wrong. I am guessing as development on the mall site could require construction of multi level parking structures in advance of other work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 2:29 PM
KnickKnack KnickKnack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 40
Anyone have any intel on this? I know it's a huge project that will not happen overnight but there's been no news on this for well over a year. Curious for any tidbits
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 3:34 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,025
The first buildings should start in spring/summer 2025. Twin 10 story buildings - 350 units, slated along Maroons Rd. I am not sure if it is on the parcel closest to St James or Empress.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 3:35 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
The first buildings should start in spring/summer 2025. Twin 10 story buildings - 350 units, slated along Maroons Rd. I am not sure if it is on the parcel closest to St James or Empress.
Can you divulge where this info is coming from? Private source or something haha?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 3:56 PM
neutroniks neutroniks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
The first buildings should start in spring/summer 2025. Twin 10 story buildings - 350 units, slated along Maroons Rd. I am not sure if it is on the parcel closest to St James or Empress.
That's exciting to hear because St James feels like it's decades behind on development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 3:57 PM
KnickKnack KnickKnack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
The first buildings should start in spring/summer 2025. Twin 10 story buildings - 350 units, slated along Maroons Rd. I am not sure if it is on the parcel closest to St James or Empress.
oh, excellent! the empty lots there are such a waste.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 4:29 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Can you divulge where this info is coming from? Private source or something haha?
If you want me to keep posting stuff like this, then no.

My info is generally never just word on the street.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:12 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.