HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2561  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2020, 9:47 PM
BuildUpWpg BuildUpWpg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The study notes that the freeway upgrade was recommended back in 1988 yet there was literally no progress for 30+ years until they started closing down some of the median openings last year.

There is no excuse for not doing it this time.
Probably because the province noticed that Saskatchewan is leaping well ahead of us in freeway building...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2562  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2020, 10:00 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildUpWpg View Post
Probably because the province noticed that Saskatchewan is leaping well ahead of us in freeway building...
That's the same way we'll eventually get an LRT... construction will commence a year after Saskatoon's first line opens
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2563  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 1:02 AM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
That's the same way we'll eventually get an LRT... construction will commence a year after Saskatoon's first line opens
More like our politicians will consider one LRT line only once Saskatoon and Regina both have a fully built out LRT system with high speed trains connecting the two cities and with daily service to Edmonton and Calgary.

Much like how Regina got a full freeway system for 3/4 around the city and Manitoba says "Here's a singular diamond interchange because we need to look like we're spending stimulus money"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2564  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 2:14 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
That's the same way we'll eventually get an LRT... construction will commence a year after Saskatoon's first line opens
LOL! Funny but true, but you just know Winnipeg would only send a contingent to Saskatoon to study the feasibility of an LRT before commencing a long term study or two!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2565  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 5:29 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
LOL! Funny but true, but you just know Winnipeg would only send a contingent to Saskatoon to study the feasibility of an LRT before commencing a long term study or two!
And have two more studies on top of other studies, just to make sure it is completely feasible, while cross-referencing previous studies made 10 years before, that cross-referenced previous studies 50 years before.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2566  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 2:58 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCake View Post
More like our politicians will consider one LRT line only once Saskatoon and Regina both have a fully built out LRT system with high speed trains connecting the two cities and with daily service to Edmonton and Calgary.

Much like how Regina got a full freeway system for 3/4 around the city and Manitoba says "Here's a singular diamond interchange because we need to look like we're spending stimulus money"
How did Saskatchewan finance such an expensive highway project? It's not likely that Manitoba politicians would deliberately avoid a vote-winning project like Perimeter Highway improvements if the financial means to pursue it actually existed.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2567  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 3:34 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,271
P3. Pay back later over decades.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2568  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 4:01 PM
Glenn99 Glenn99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
The 'initial' phase is based on 2048 traffic flows. So 30 years out from 2018 when the study was actually done. So pretty much ya they'll be doing 1 project at a time type thing forever.

I don't think it actually says anything that it will take until 2048. Just based on 2048 volumes. It also says timing of the ultimate phase s uncertain. By that time I'd presume they will have already reassessed based on actual traffic volumes. 30 years is a long time.
Funding is a big problem. Make it a toll road like the 407 and you'd have it done in 10 years. Of course there would be a change in government in that time and the whole thing would be cancelled.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2569  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 4:03 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,271
Don’t
toll
existing
roads.
Headingley and Deacon’s Corners Bypass, maybe, but not this.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2570  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 7:05 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Don’t
toll
existing
roads.
Headingley and Deacon’s Corners Bypass, maybe, but not this.
I agree. Doing this as a P3 would be a simple solution. Does MB have actual plans for the road and interchanges?

Sometimes I wonder if MB (provincial government) has convinced itself that only one interchange can be built at a time. Money can't be the only issue. There's never going to be a better time to build than now. Interest rates are going to be super low for years and construction costs will probably never be this low again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2571  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 10:52 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
I agree. Doing this as a P3 would be a simple solution. Does MB have actual plans for the road and interchanges?

Sometimes I wonder if MB (provincial government) has convinced itself that only one interchange can be built at a time. Money can't be the only issue. There's never going to be a better time to build than now. Interest rates are going to be super low for years and construction costs will probably never be this low again.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2572  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2020, 11:46 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
It really is weird. I would like to hear the explanation why normal, routine infrastructure in other places, like diamond interchanges on major highways, is some kind of insurmountable challenge in this province. Which it must be, since there aren't any actual diamond interchanges here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2573  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 2:48 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
It really is weird. I would like to hear the explanation why normal, routine infrastructure in other places, like diamond interchanges on major highways, is some kind of insurmountable challenge in this province. Which it must be, since there aren't any actual diamond interchanges here.
Winnipeg is the economic driver of Manitoba and where highway infrastructure dollars need to be spent with 80% of the province’s population, 1) continue Canada Way west and connect to the TCH west of Headingly, 2) bypass around St. Norbert lined up with Kenaston, 3) South Perimeter free flowing with two interchanges at St. Anne’s and St. Mary’s with all other access points closed off 4) overpass at Elie, 5) overpass and interchange at TCH and Yellowhead Hwy. 6) continue divided TCH to Ontario border 7) overpass on TCH at one of the Brandon access points....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2574  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 3:44 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
It really is weird. I would like to hear the explanation why normal, routine infrastructure in other places, like diamond interchanges on major highways, is some kind of insurmountable challenge in this province. Which it must be, since there aren't any actual diamond interchanges here.
That is so weird that MB has no diamond interchanges given that they're the cheapest type of interchange to build in the vast majority of cases.

I was just looking up a major road project in Calgary to see if there's a progress report on it and came across some interesting info. For the current phase of the project they applied for funding from the feds under the National Trade Corridors Fund and ended up receiving $50 million which covers just shy of 1/3 of the cost ($153.35 million). The City, province and Calgary Airport Authority are covering the rest of the cost. Has Winnipeg and/or the province of MB applied for such funding? The Perimeter Highway should qualify if this fund still exists. With some initiative and thinking outside the box (P3) there's no reason why a major stretch of that highway couldn't be turned into a proper freeway within about five years if there are design plans in place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2575  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 4:44 AM
DavefromSt.Vital DavefromSt.Vital is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yonge and Davisville
Posts: 696
National Trade Corridors Fund info (funding until 2028):

https://tc.canada.ca/en/programs/nat...corridors-fund

Projects already funded:

https://tc.canada.ca/en/programs/pro...corridors-fund
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2576  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 2:42 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
Has Winnipeg and/or the province of MB applied for such funding? The Perimeter Highway should qualify if this fund still exists. With some initiative and thinking outside the box (P3) there's no reason why a major stretch of that highway couldn't be turned into a proper freeway within about five years if there are design plans in place.
We have a Premier who thinks accepting federal money is a sign of weakness. If we can't do it ourselves, it isn't happening. Somewhere along the line Pallister became a major adherent of North Korean juche principles of self-reliance. 주체 主體!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2577  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 3:07 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
We have a Premier who thinks accepting federal money is a sign of weakness. If we can't do it ourselves, it isn't happening. Somewhere along the line Pallister became a major adherent of North Korean juche principles of self-reliance. 주체 主體!!!
$2.5 B in equalization payments to MB the past couple years says otherwise!

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-...transfers.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2578  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 3:22 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
$2.5 B in equalization payments to MB the past couple years says otherwise!

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-...transfers.html
So explain to me why he'll accept federal money for social programs (outlined in the page you linked to) but not for infrastructure?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2579  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 5:23 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
So explain to me why he'll accept federal money for social programs (outlined in the page you linked to) but not for infrastructure?
Two easy answers. He can't refuse the funds outlined, and they don't require him to provide matching funds.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2580  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2020, 5:54 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Two easy answers. He can't refuse the funds outlined, and they don't require him to provide matching funds.
He also thinks everything is an intrusion into provincial jurisdiction. So fair enough, he can stand his ground and not yield to Ottawa. But in the meantime little gets done, and we continue to drive around on our 1970s highway network.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.