Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Is it? Or is it just a case that IKEA delivers something that few others can match?
When I was a student in Edmonton in the early 2000s, I was able to outfit a reasonably nice looking apartment dirt cheap with IKEA furniture. At the time, the only cheaper alternative was Wal-Mart/Canadian Tire particle board garbage, or Goodwill. You could get United Furniture Warehouse/Brick blowout deals for about the same price and somewhat comparable quality, but it was generally uglier.
These days competition is a little stiffer with more places offering decent cheap furniture. But I'd say that IKEA built a better mousetrap...hence the crowds. Good for them.
|
Don't get me wrong, I like IKEA as much as the next guy for the reasons you've already stated. I'm just commenting on the negative effects that sort of concentration has in any market.
It's like Costco to me (other than the fact that Costco has a very attractive labour model): I love the store. The quality is great, the service is fantastic and it's ultimately convenient as hell if you can figure out when some of the down hours are. But every time I go back to Costco or get a mailer of sorts I'm always seeing Costco creeping into territory they've otherwise never been and our economies need smaller, more local enterprise to carry them.
I just find it ironic that bigger, more 'legitimate' cities do what they can to attach themselves to more regional and local outfits and cities like ours seemingly can't wait for the huge stores to come in and wipe these players off the map.