HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2007, 2:46 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
Saturday Market relocation moves step closer to reality
Daily Journal of Commerce
by Alison Ryan
08/29/2007


Pulling from the built language of the past has pushed designs for a new Saturday Market site closer to approval, members of the Portland Historic Landmarks Commission said Monday.

The design that TVA Architects and Walker Macy took to an initial advice session used a pair of tall, tapered geometric sunshades to shield Saturday Market’s buyers and sellers from the elements. Commissioners’ comments focused on the sunshade design, which they said should connect more strongly to the history of the Skidmore/Old Town District.

The problem, TVA principal Robert Thompson said, was that the design team was treating the sunshades as a building rather than a shelter.

“It was a dominant feature that had a lot of people concerned,” he said.

Renderings revealed at Monday’s design advice session show a long, flat shade that’s anchored in the center by columns and a rooftop cantilever system. Glass sections punch light into the middle of the structure. Wood decking, inspired by the tongue-and-groove floors of warehouse building, lines the ceiling. The cabling that stretches from roof center to edge is meant to echo the rhythm and character of historic overhangs, Thompson said, and act as a subtle nautical reference.

“We’re not trying to recreate history,” Jeannine Rustad of project team member Winterbrook Planning said, “but respect it within our design.”

It’s a simple way to house the market activities, Thompson said, and that’s what the design should have been all along.

“During market days it’ll sort of disappear,” landscape architect Doug Macy said. “Everything else is so colorful and noisy.”

Commissioners said the structure design is on the right track.

“Not building a building and doing a cover is a much better way to look at it,” Commissioner Carrie Richter said.

The sunshades are part of a larger plaza project that will add a curved Willamette River overlook and a large, also curved, central plaza to the north end of Waterfront Park. An under-structure water feature, one of two proposed for the plaza project, may be overkill, commissioners said.

“I think you can lose it and it really doesn’t negatively impact the design,” vice chairman Art DeMuro said.

Improvements to the Skidmore Fountain MAX station and a neighboring storefront facade are also part of the effort. Activating and illuminating the station, which sits under the Burnside Bridge next to the existing Saturday Market site, is the goal.

“Being under that bridge is actually quite delightful,” Thompson said.

Public interest in the project is high. Project location means designers are working within both the Skidmore/Old Town design guidelines and the Willamette Greenway design guidelines. And the design team is grabbing feedback from advisory groups from organizations like Portland Saturday Market and the Portland Development Commission as well.

“It’s a long list of masters they’ve had to meet,” city planner Kristen Minor said.

http://www.djcoregon.com/viewStory.c...30037&userID=1
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 4:29 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532

Landmarks sends Mercy Corps HQ back to the drawing board

POSTED: 06:00 AM PDT Wednesday, October 10, 2007
BY ALISON RYAN
Daily Journal of Commerce

The Portland Historic Landmarks Commission on Monday came close to denying plans for the proposed Mercy Corps headquarters in Old Town.

The project has two parts: the renovation of the Skidmore Fountain Building and the erection of a four-story addition on an empty abutting site.

Renovation of the Skidmore building (also known as the Reed Building and the Packer-Scott Building) would remove the spoilers of a 1985 renovation – among them mezzanine and penthouse levels – and restore the building’s brick, replace windows and make seismic upgrades.

The addition would double the building’s square footage and add three distinct façades to the historic district.

The east façade, where designers propose weaving together horizontal and vertical bands of glass, most concerned commissioners. The woven pattern, architect Thomas Hacker said, expresses the interactive, dynamic, multi-cultural work of Mercy Corps, which works to build safe communities for impoverished and oppressed people around the globe.

The expansion, commissioners said, is well-designed. But its architecture, they said, has taken over the project when it should defer to the historic Skidmore building. And the east façade’s wide stretch of glass doesn’t fit a district that features mostly small, punched window openings.

Commissioners said it was difficult to keep assessment of the design separate from the emotionally charged work of Mercy Corps.

“I feel like I’m criticizing Mother Teresa’s wardrobe,” Commissioner Art DeMuro said.

The design team had the choice of asking the commission to vote Monday, when denial seemed likely, or reworking plans for another review session. The team chose to present the project again Nov. 5.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...-drawing-board
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 5:33 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
Is there a rendering of the proposed design?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 7:37 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,599
Yeah, we need renderings.

Quote:
The expansion, commissioners said, is well-designed. But its architecture, they said, has taken over the project when it should defer to the historic Skidmore building. And the east façade’s wide stretch of glass doesn’t fit a district that features mostly small, punched window openings.
It's difficult to comment when you haven't seen the design with your own eyes, but the kind of thinking reflected in this quote pisses me off. It is stifling, when what PDX needs down there is well-designed vibrancy and boldness. A contemporary design that converses with, but does not necessarily "defer to", the Skidmore bldg, would fit the bill perfectly imo. And the east facade, which, if I'm not mistaken, will front Naito across from the waterfront, would do well to include lots of glass rather than being forced to close itself off to the street in the name of including "small, punched window openings" a la the late 19th/early 20th centuries. Give me a f*cking break.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 8:21 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
This pre-app from May was the only conceptual renderings I have found, however I have seen more detailed renderings, I'll keep searching...

http://www.portlandonline.com/shared....cfm?id=156742
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 8:21 PM
kvalk kvalk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
mercycorps.org has project renderings...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 8:30 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
^duh! I didn't even think of checking out their website. On their website the renderings of the new building with the Skidmore actually blend together really well.

I don't particularly like the design, but I don't see how the historic landmarks commission could possibly say it doesn't work. They are a bunch of snobby asses...I'm so tired of a freaking design review board chasing companies out of Portland...first Apple, and now they are putting additional pressure on MercyCorps and even the Saturday Market. screw 'em. What's the point of having the PDC if we can't get anything approved in this town in the historic districts?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 8:39 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,599
The sketch renderings on that website of the south side of the new bldg look pretty underwhelming, if not on the bad side. Possibly too much deference imo, resulting in a design that looks confused and awkward. The historic landmarks commission should help them make it even less compelling.

This rendering, though, is of the east side from the bridge and imo looks better.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 1:41 AM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 521
It isn't PDC, it's the Historic Landmarks Commission. They are appointed by the mayor and city council. They review structures strictly within designated historic areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 2:20 AM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
I remember reading that the architect of the Chinese Formal Gardens making a comment that there should be less designing of structures to fit the historical district and creating more contemporary design to add contrast to the overall fabric. He felt this was missing in the area where the garden is located. I tend to agree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 4:30 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopdx
It isn't PDC, it's the Historic Landmarks Commission. They are appointed by the mayor and city council. They review structures strictly within designated historic areas.
I know, what I mean is that the PDC brings the companies to a certain property, gives incentives, promises of quick approval, and sometimes promises variations out of code, and then the Landmarks Commission works against everything the PDC promised, in order to win the company over. It seems like it would be frustrating to potential companies to have one group tell you one thing, and a bunch of assess intent on not only preserving existing buildings, but require all new buildings to blend in, or even stand behind the older buildings. I think this is wrong and don't want to live in a city with a bunch of faux buildings.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 5:57 PM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
I don't particularly like the design, but I don't see how the historic landmarks commission could possibly say it doesn't work. They are a bunch of snobby asses...I'm so tired of a freaking design review board chasing companies out of Portland...first Apple, and now they are putting additional pressure on MercyCorps and even the Saturday Market. screw 'em. What's the point of having the PDC if we can't get anything approved in this town in the historic districts?
Totally agree with you mark...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2007, 2:06 AM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 521
yeah, it really angers.

i believe the landmark commission should only serve as advisors to the design commission. they should not have the power to derail a project such as the apple store. it is a failure of the system.

i'm glad we have historic districts in this city, however the landmarks commission does a poor job at recognizing the potential of melding modern structures with historic. they should be forced to spend time in amsterdam to see how well modern mixes with actual historically significant structures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2007, 11:09 PM
Sioux612's Avatar
Sioux612 Sioux612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 539
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 3:32 PM
Eagle rock Eagle rock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 119
Bud Clark Commons | x feet | 7 floors | Complete

http://www.portlandmercury.com/portl...category=34029
Somewhere to Go, Something to Believe In
Great Expectations for the City's New Homeless Center
BY MATT DAVIS

A center to "end" homelessness in Portland has been a long time coming.

"We first tried this when my daughter was born," says Margaret Bax, the housing policy manager in City Commissioner Erik Sten's office. "And she's about to graduate college."

Sten told the Mercury on October 1 he expected to settle on a site for a new center to shelter homeless people and help them move into housing "in the next two weeks" ["No Room at the Inn," News, Oct 4]. And with up to $30 million worth of possible investment, everyone is curious about what to expect when the center eventually opens in—fingers crossed—2009. However, Sten's deadline has already passed, and negotiations are still in the works.

Andy Wilch, housing director for the Portland Development Commission (PDC), now says the agency is likely to choose a site for the center by "the first week of December." The two contending locations are the "Dirty Duck block," nicknamed after the bar on its corner at NW 3rd and Glisan, and the triangular historic fire station block, or A&N block, kitty corner from it, next to the onramp for the Steel Bridge in Old Town.

Regardless of which site is chosen, and how long the decision actually takes, how did the city get here, historically? Does anybody really believe the center can "end" homelessness in Portland, and if so, what's different about the efforts to do it this time, as opposed to when a similar project was attempted in the 1980s? What makes everyone so sure this new center is going to be a success?

LEARNING FROM PORTLAND'S MISTAKES

Housing Policy Manager Bax is coordinating the city's effort to site and build the homeless resource center with the county and a trio of organizations with acronyms for names—the PDC, the Housing Authority of Portland (HAP), and the Bureau of Housing and Community Development (BHCD).

Around the time Bax's daughter was born, Bax was taking part in an effort under Mayor Bud Clark in the '80s to remodel what was then called the Beaver Hotel, into what now serves as the city's current homeless center—part of Clark's "12-point plan to end homelessness."

If that sounds familiar, it's probably because Bax's "new" effort to build a "new" center is part of a "new" "10-year plan to end homelessness" launched by Sten three years ago—it borrowed elements of Clark's plan, but emphasized a speedier transition between homelessness and permanent housing, with fewer intermediate steps.

Today the old Beaver Hotel, behind the Greyhound bus station on the corner of NW 5th and Glisan is, to quote Bax, "worn out." It's been through a number of changes, hosting homeless men's and women's shelters over the years, and currently plays host to Transition Projects, Inc. (TPI), a homeless men's shelter, and the Medford House, a treatment center for high-risk offenders with addiction problems.

To an uninitiated visitor, TPI's men's shelter makes an unforgettable first impression—men cram themselves into bunk beds spaced so closely together that the shelter had to get special permission from the fire bureau just to stay open. It's not a place that inspires optimism.

When dinner is brought in each evening, there's nowhere for the men to eat it, other than sitting on the edge of their beds. It's more like a scene from Down and Out in Paris and London—George Orwell's 1933 account of living as a "tramp" in those cities—than what one expects from a supposedly ultra-liberal city in the richest nation on Earth in 2007.

The mood hardly lightens when you walk around the corner into TPI's "service access center"—more than 20 people crowd into about 100 square feet of floor space, take a number, and wait their turn to speak to one of three desk clerks behind a tiny, battered counter. The center gets busiest when it first opens—there's usually a line waiting outside—but there's always frustration in the air.

"There's not enough space for people to sit in a dignified manner," says Fern Elledge, the shelter's human resource director, who is gearing up to manage the new homeless center when it opens. "So our clients get frustrated, and about twice a week yelling erupts. It's very stressful for everyone."

Someone has pinned quotes from Aldous Huxley's dystopic novel Brave New World on a wall in TPI's mailroom, where another Xerox'd quote by Fyodor Dostoevsky hangs: "Originality and a feeling of dignity are achieved only through work and struggle."

Struggle, indeed. In the basement, there's a bizarre, 300-ton mound of 100-year-old earth left behind by the people who built the original building in 1907. It could be taken symbolically as the center's very own Sisyphean mountain—named for the Greek mythological character whose only task was to endlessly roll a rock up said mountain, doomed to repeat the effort again and again.

Aside from being "worn out," the building just isn't working: TPI has an extremely long waiting list, and has had ongoing problems with people camping outside. Those camps attract drug dealers, who conceal themselves in the crowd, and the cops are fed up with making arrests on the center's sidewalk—it's a vicious cycle.

"The problem, is, we're telling people who are camping elsewhere to go to [TPI] for services," says Central Precinct Commander Mike Reese. "But when they get there, there's a 10-week wait." The wait for women at a shelter around the corner is worse: 12 weeks, currently.

"Meanwhile, the Medford [House] and TPI are seeing their clients dropping like flies because when they come out of the building they have to wade through this sea of humanity," Reese continues, "with people outside shooting up, smoking crack, and drinking—the very problems they're trying to kick."

MY, WHAT SERVICE!

Thankfully, things have changed since Bax first oversaw the conversion of the old Beaver Hotel, and practices have changed when it comes to building centers for the homeless.

"How we provide shelter and services is different now," she says. "We're not just trying to get people off the streets. We know people need to get stabilized in housing to stay off the streets."

That means a whole host of services need to be incorporated in the new center that weren't in the old one: The maximum zoned height for both properties being considered is 350 feet, and it's "likely" all of that may be required, according to Leah Greenwood at PDC. TPI has the contract with the city to run the new access center when it's built, and has drafted a series of recommendations on what to offer.
Basic service ideas include a day-access center for 70 people aimed at getting them out of the elements during the day, an outside smoking area for 20 people, shelter beds for 90 men at night (in 45 bunk beds), lockers for people to store their belongings, 10 showers with dressing areas, laundry facilities, restrooms, a dining area (no more eating in bed), a commercial kitchen, internet and computer kiosks, and a mail service.

Ideas for resources to help move people into housing include meeting rooms for staff to connect people to assistance programs, meeting spaces to run a variety of rental and employment classes, private meeting rooms for mental health services, medical exam rooms, and a medication storage area.

On top of that, HAP, which is the lead developer on the project, hopes to add permanent supported housing on the center's upper floors.

"Fifty units of supportive housing is a good planning number," says Mike Andrews, director of development and community revitalization at HAP. "It's not too many, and not too few."

ASK A HOMELESS PERSON

"It's awesome we're going to have a day-access center, and that it's something in the works and actually going to happen, it seems," says Patrick Nolen, community organizer at Sisters of the Road, who was himself homeless in Portland for eight years. "But I hope there's community involvement in the width and depth of the program."

For Nolen, that means everything—from the hours the center is open, to rules for use of the center's computers, its kitchen space, even what kind of mental health counseling is offered—needs to be first run past the homeless community the center is geared to serving. As a result, Sisters of the Road is advocating for focus groups involving the homeless community to be held before the center's plans are drawn up.

"We should do that," says BHCD'S Heather Lyons, who helped write Sten's 10-year plan. "It's absolutely critical to have the voice of the people who'll eventually be using the systems involved in the planning process."

GETTING BUSINESS ON BOARD

Perhaps the most important part of delivering the new center will be the support of downtown's businesses. Historically, that community has been against accommodating homeless shelters.

Twenty years ago, Mayor Bud Clark blocked an attempt by the now-defunct homeless shelter Baloney Joe's to move from its location on the Eastside into what is now the Pearl District (next to what eventually became the Park Kitchen restaurant). When Clark learned Baloney Joe's had bought a space on NW 8th and Flanders, he called an emergency press conference the next day to speak out against the attempt, citing business concerns. Baloney Joe's ultimately closed, eight years later.

Things are different today. The Portland Business Alliance, which represents 1,300 businesses in and around Portland, has found itself in the (perhaps unexpected) position of being an advocate for better social services downtown. This was sparked by the Alliance's involvement in Mayor Tom Potter's Street Access for Everyone (SAFE) committee last year.

The SAFE committee has established a temporary day-access center, the Julia West House, downtown at SW 13th and Alder, in exchange for council passing a controversial law banning people from sitting or lying on the sidewalk—a political bargaining process covered extensively in this newspaper. But the temporary center only provides very basic services for between 40 and 60 of downtown's homeless, and already it's overflowing.

"We've been an advocate for the new day-access center from day one because it will make downtown better for everyone, including the homeless population," says Mike Kuykendall, vice president of downtown services for the Alliance.

Times for Portland's business community appear to have changed. And for Clark, too—he's now on the board of TPI.

HOLDING POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE

Having the political will to build a $30 million center from scratch to help people out of homelessness is a massive opportunity for Portland. What remains to be seen is if Commissioner Erik Sten and his team can pull it off. The center has been a generation in coming, but what's to stop the ball from being dropped for another 10 years?

As council's chief homeless representative, Sten is the archetypal good guy, and is arguably given an easier ride by certain journalists than his fellow commissioners and other lobbying groups because of it. Indeed, so far, much of the community's ample frustration over the slow progress of the access center has been misdirected at the mayor's office rather than Sten, ever since Potter chose to get involved in Portland's homeless scene by convening the SAFE committee.

For example, on September 11, TPI Executive Director Doreen Binder vented her spleen on Kyle Chisek, a mayoral staffer, at a meeting of the downtown public safety action committee.

"The 10-year plan talks about having an access center," she said. "For God's sakes, get it done. Kyle: Get the goddamn building done already."

Ultimately, of course, Sten is the man responsible for getting the goddamn building done already. Let's just hope he can pull it off within the decade.

"I think Erik himself would be very disappointed if this process weren't resolved before he leaves office," Binder says—about as close to putting him on the hook for the center as she's willing to go.

There's also the small problem, for Sten, of coming up with the money. Sten wants to divert urban renewal funds for the center from what PDC currently calls the "river district," or the Pearl District—now that it's been "renewed," he wants to spread some of the cash around. But that's by no means a done deal, and could easily spawn more delays and a swarm of controversial press coverage.

Nevertheless, Sten is talking like a confident man.

"We're going to do it," he told us on October 1.

No pressure, Erik, but you'd better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 7:50 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
A 30-story homeless shelter? How does that work?

Are there any precedents for this in other cities?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 7:57 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,334
Wild. 20+ story storage buildings and now a 350 foot homeless shelter. Oh, Portland, you rock.
__________________
My girlfriend has a dog named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 8:18 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65MAX View Post
A 30-story homeless shelter? How does that work?

Are there any precedents for this in other cities?
Ghetto towers that were built and now falling apart maybe? This are the things that separates Portland from most other American cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 8:21 PM
PDX City-State PDX City-State is offline
Well designed mixed use
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: under the Burnside Bridge
Posts: 1,589
Let's take every homeless person in Portland and put them all in one giant building! What a fucking horrible idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2007, 8:52 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
you think they were are talking about a mixed use project with a homeless shelter on the bottom floors, maybe a partnership with HAP or HOST for affordable housing on the upper floors?

You can't build a 30 story tower for $30M, so it would be mixed use in some form. However, I think a central, city sponsored homeless centre with all housing/job/additiction resources available in one location is not a bad idea at all.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.