HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2361  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2016, 9:20 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
I don't think they will be capping anything, but anything in development that is a relatively large project, might be at risk...

But, that's another story.....
my bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2362  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2016, 5:47 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2363  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2016, 6:15 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Stantec:



(More)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2364  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2016, 7:14 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,043
Here we go...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2365  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 3:01 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,485
Those support pillars look like they're going to be massive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2366  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 3:27 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
You didnt lie. I still cant picture in my head how this will look in the skyline from various angles.
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2367  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 6:07 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is online now
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,727
This should help:

From Nathan Phillips Square
[IMG][/IMG]

From the new Globe & mail HQ
[IMG][/IMG]

From Casa II
[IMG][/IMG]

From the CN Tower
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2368  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 10:40 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaletown_fella View Post
You didnt lie. I still cant picture in my head how this will look in the skyline from various angles.
This is like a skyline connector tower, a whole bunch of them going up in the Yonge Dundas area. They are bridging the gap in the East-West skyline between the financial district and College Park/Yorkville.

Yonge-Dundas Square could really benefit from more towers surrounding the Square to make it more impactful, now that the LED boards there are going into overdrive. Thankfully there are a lot of possibilities for redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2369  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 3:30 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Those support pillars look like they're going to be massive.
They are. Deep, too, about 100m down.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2370  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 3:55 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,691
I always thought the bedrock was shallower the further north you go.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2371  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 5:12 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
^ Where Edmonton sits there are deep layers of glacial clay, till and sedimentary rock:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton_Group
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2372  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2016, 10:37 PM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,423
Thanks for the visuals koops

#2 is barely recognizable as Toronto.
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2373  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2016, 5:00 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Those are some crazy piles for Stantec. That transfer slab is simply colossal too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2374  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 3:30 AM
vaportrail's Avatar
vaportrail vaportrail is offline
That's no excuse!
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 387
Stantec update from March 12, 2016, with JW Marriott at the far side of the pit.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2375  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 7:26 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Is it just me or is the Stantec and JW Marriott pits taking a really long time to start to rise. If memory serves, they reached the bottom of the pit before Telus Sky, and now Telus Sky's core is nearly out of its pit, the 3rd deepest pit ever excavated for a Canadian building.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2376  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 7:30 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Is it just me or is the Stantec and JW Marriott pits taking a really long time to start to rise. If memory serves, they reached the bottom of the pit before Telus Sky, and now Telus Sky's core is nearly out of its pit, the 3rd deepest pit ever excavated for a Canadian building.

Probably due to the image above. Dig down drill holes and fill. I'm not sure how long they need to wait for those pylons to harden before they can start with the basement floors.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2377  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 7:31 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Is it just me or is the Stantec and JW Marriott pits taking a really long time to start to rise. If memory serves, they reached the bottom of the pit before Telus Sky, and now Telus Sky's core is nearly out of its pit, the 3rd deepest pit ever excavated for a Canadian building.
The several dozen 100m deep pilings took a while. See previous posts with the structural rendering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2378  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 9:03 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
1 year to get down, 1 year to get back up...


One bloor took almost 3 years to get down, and then get back up again to ground level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2379  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 10:15 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Is it just me or is the Stantec and JW Marriott pits taking a really long time to start to rise. If memory serves, they reached the bottom of the pit before Telus Sky, and now Telus Sky's core is nearly out of its pit, the 3rd deepest pit ever excavated for a Canadian building.
Those caissons are over 3 times the depth of the 3rd deepest excavation in history. Sometimes there's more involved in building a stable foundation than just digging a hole. For Calgary, bedrock is shallow but it's unstable, fractured shale so raft slabs are used to distribute the weight and add stability. In Toronto's business district, they don't need anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2380  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 10:27 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
1 year to get down, 1 year to get back up...


One bloor took almost 3 years to get down, and then get back up again to ground level.
Yup and one Bloor has 50 metre long caissons supporting it; half the length of Stantecs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.