HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #23741  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2014, 10:57 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,452
49 Single Family Homes Planned for the Former Riddell Site on Milwaukee:

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140...elmets-housing

Between this and the 6 six flats under construction just to the south, the entire character of that stretch of Milwaukee is going to change overnight. The two biggest eyesore lots will have bit the dust almost at the exact same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23742  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2014, 11:58 PM
ChiHi's Avatar
ChiHi ChiHi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 172
1345 Wabash

Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
1345 has some kinda weird floorplans, too. Corner units (the only ones that would have long term views) have ridiculous serpentine hallways between the front doors and the actual living areas, and the rest of the units are weirdly narrow. It all really feels like an afterthought to the apartment tower, which if memory serves it basically is. I'm happy for south loop to get some more condos, but if it fails to fill up it could be because of the quality of the product rather than the strength of the market.
It seems that CMK is becoming synonymous for awkward and small floor plans. They did it with 235 Van Buren, 630 Franklin, 1620 &1720 S Michigan and VUE20. Hard to believe these guys built the Contemporaine. Their building look decent but function pretty horribly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23743  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 12:47 AM
BWChicago's Avatar
BWChicago BWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
49 Single Family Homes Planned for the Former Riddell Site on Milwaukee:

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140...elmets-housing

Between this and the 6 six flats under construction just to the south, the entire character of that stretch of Milwaukee is going to change overnight. The two biggest eyesore lots will have bit the dust almost at the exact same time.
It's good, but that stretch of Milwaukee really kills the energy, with the high school to one side and SFH on the other and to the north. Where else on Milwaukee are there SFH? I think that these are detrimental to Six Corners. Avondale is going to be the next Logan Square (which was the next Wicker Park), but it's going to hit a wall once it gets to Addison. The whole of Milwaukee between Addison and Irving is really terribly planned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23744  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 1:11 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,441
I guess, but there's no transit there to fuel a bustling commercial district along Milwaukee. The Blue Line is a good 3/4 mile away. The Grayland Metra station doesn't count.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23745  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 1:17 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,291
Anyone know the story of the building on the northeast corner of Ashland and 21st? It looked like it was being rehabbed for a long time, then i drove by today and it is almost completely demolished. Is something new going up there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23746  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 1:32 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWChicago View Post
It's good, but that stretch of Milwaukee really kills the energy, with the high school to one side and SFH on the other and to the north. Where else on Milwaukee are there SFH? I think that these are detrimental to Six Corners. Avondale is going to be the next Logan Square (which was the next Wicker Park), but it's going to hit a wall once it gets to Addison. The whole of Milwaukee between Addison and Irving is really terribly planned.
The sad part is that a "proposal for 250 apartments was rejected as too dense for the neighborhood", despite the fact that this site is right up against a metra station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23747  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 3:23 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Link N. Parker View Post
LOL, kinda funny. I was wondering if when that was going to happen, have a high school named after him or even an entire street, or park
It used to be thought unseemly to name things for living persons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23748  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2014, 3:51 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,291
Former chief of staff making a play for the more valuable Obama library. If it's going to be built anyways...what's in a name?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23749  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 9:20 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by sloop.chi View Post
Appears they might be doing soil testing at State/Harrison large parking lot? Anyone know of anything?


Believe me, I'm all in favor of killing the parking lots.. but it occurs to me that if every block is filled in, the only way to see a skyline will be from the lake.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23750  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 9:59 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckman821 View Post
I believe it is next door to that McDonalds. So we're now going to have not one but two drive thrus within spitting distance of the upcoming $200+ Million new Wilson station.
You were right, the Sonic is not replacing the McDonalds, it is next door to it so there will be 2 drive-thrus right freaking next to each other. Sonics don't have interior space, so you have to eat on a bench or in your car. What should be only a delight of hungry truckers crossing the Nebraska plains - an asphalt oasis with endless lanes of running engines dribbling exhaust and ground beef grease - is now taking shape right in a densifying urban neighborhood. And it all gets celebrated in about a week.

http://voices.suntimes.com/business-...-ready-to-roll
Chicago’s first Sonic drive-in ready to roll
April 24, 2014

The first Sonic drive-in restaurant in Chicago will open May 6 in Uptown. The drive-in at 1022 W. Wilson Ave. announced the opening date on its Facebook page.

It can be a matter of pride in a lot of small towns when you get your first Sonic, so we still have a lot of towns around the state to grow,” Sonic’s chief development and strategy officer John Budd said recently. ...

Last edited by denizen467; Apr 27, 2014 at 10:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23751  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 10:55 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,628
Some of the worst food I've ever had was from Sonic. So, yippee.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23752  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 11:39 PM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,043
I'm not sure if this has been posted, but aside from the gross scale, and inept architecture of the new 3030 N Broadway proposal, the site plan is what really makes this proposal a potential neighborhood killer.

source: DNAinfo

Thats right, not only an interior "retail alley", but a 30 space surface lot fronting a residential street, sitting above the main parking garage ramp.

Instead of Valerio Dewalt Train, we get Antunovich. Instead of 2 floors of retail and 4 floors of apartments along a sleek, glass filled Broadway elevation, we get 6 floors of retail behind an atrocious, mostly precast elevation. Instead of 5 floors of residential fronting Waterloo Court, we get a 30 space surface lot. Instead of 53 condos/apartments, we get Zero.

What an absolute disaster, this is Halsted/Clark all over again... only 20+ years later. I really hope that the local interest groups look around at Halsted/Clark, the Broadway at Surf, and the dying Century Shopping Centre, and say enough is enough to these abominations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23753  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 11:46 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,290
I don't mind a sonic opening in Chicago, but it certainly shows a lack of focus and planning in the city. I could understand if this was miles west, but near the CTA? Sheesh. It's such a low intensity use of the site.

The irony of this is the foolishness of NIMBYS that complain about automobile traffic from a quiet residential building.....yet somehow a business like this pulls it off with grace and the wind at their back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23754  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 12:33 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by untitledreality View Post
Thats right, not only an interior "retail alley", but a 30 space surface lot fronting a residential street, sitting above the main parking garage ramp.
It's not a "surface lot", it's parking tucked under a ramp. The Waterloo side of the development is the least of the problems with this development... it's actually kinda nice.

__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23755  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 1:18 AM
Buckman821's Avatar
Buckman821 Buckman821 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
The irony of this is the foolishness of NIMBYS that complain about automobile traffic from a quiet residential building.....yet somehow a business like this pulls it off with grace and the wind at their back.
So incredibly true. It really boggles the mind. I remember making a somewhat negative comment about the Sonic on Uptown Update and it was not so warmly received.

The only good thing I can say about a Sonic is that it hardly seems like they sunk much money into the building. If development pressures increase, maybe we can hope for better things sooner rather than later?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23756  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 1:27 PM
Kenmore Kenmore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Uptown
Posts: 641
buried in a recent article on the CTA redline north work

Quote:
The CTA also plans to acquire the block-long strip mall south of Ainslie Street, at 4837-87 N. Broadway, just north of the Uptown Theatre, for an additional staging area.
this strip mall is a major blight and anything that facilities its demise is great

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140...public-storage
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23757  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 2:20 PM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
^that would be incredible. Replacing that strip mall with anything else would do wonders for the area around the Lawrence stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23758  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 3:47 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,441
I'm glad to see that the CTA is now being strategic about encouraging TOD in conjunction with its capital investments.

Ultimately those investments need to translate to higher ridership, which means more intense development, but the lack of support from aldermen on this issue has forced CTA to get proactive. Osterman pays lip service to urban density and TOD but doesn't back it up and continues to approve strip malls right by L stations.

At the same time, something makes me uncomfortable about the CTA becoming a redevelopment authority. It's not their mission and that power has been abused so many times in the past to eviscerate dense neighborhoods and replace them with sterile towers in a park. If the CTA needs room for staging, that's fine, and to the extent they can choose staging sites to encourage positive redevelopment, that's fine... But the laundry list of properties for seizure around the Clark flyover seems super excessive.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23759  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 4:01 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,892
A few decisions from the Zoning Commission meeting on Friday:

* 46 room hotel at 312 W Chestnut. Approved
* 914 W Monroe (6 stories, 8 units), 924 W Monroe (7 stories, 10 units), and 23 S Sangamon (7 stories, 10 units) == 28 units. Approved.
* 11 parking spaces approved for future renovation of vacant storage building at 3141 N Sheffield into 80 loft apartments + retail (just south of Vic and near Belmont red/brown/purple line stop).
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23760  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 4:42 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
A few decisions from the Zoning Commission meeting on Friday:

* 46 room hotel at 312 W Chestnut. Approved
...
Kind of an unusual place for a hotel ... on the other hand, that area is exploding and changing really fast these days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
...
At the same time, something makes me uncomfortable about the CTA becoming a redevelopment authority. It's not their mission and that power has been abused so many times in the past to eviscerate dense neighborhoods and replace them with sterile towers in a park.
...
But the laundry list of properties for seizure around the Clark flyover seems super excessive.
With the Brown Line they showed restraint and didn't always knock down buildings, but just carved out what they needed. Hopefully they continue with that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.