HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2281  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 1:54 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
As long as this "larger thesis of skiing" stays in park city and out of the cottonwoods, it is good by me. Plus, a lot of close friends are involved with these developments, so it is hard to complain from a personal standpoint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2282  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 2:30 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,292
I agree Cololi. The Park City Trifecta is a much better area to take Utah's ski expansion. I do think though that Snowbird will get it's way ultimately on it's recently announced ambitions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2283  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 5:23 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
So while I was driving down on redwood road yesterday by camp Williams I notice alot of earth being move around in that area WEST of redwood road. This could be one of two things. 1. This could be work on the new freeway. or 2. ground has been broken for the new NSA Spy Center.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2284  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 6:22 PM
arkhitektor arkhitektor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearfield, UT
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
So while I was driving down on redwood road yesterday by camp Williams I notice alot of earth being move around in that area WEST of redwood road. This could be one of two things. 1. This could be work on the new freeway. or 2. ground has been broken for the new NSA Spy Center.
The contract for the building itself has not been awarded, but Kiewit is doing some site prep. work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2285  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 7:14 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
I agree Cololi. The Park City Trifecta is a much better area to take Utah's ski expansion. I do think though that Snowbird will get it's way ultimately on it's recently announced ambitions.
I am not as worried as much about Snowbird (except the second tram is terrible), but Alta's and Solitude's expansions are far more troublesome and impactful. At least the Forest service already denied Solitude's proposal, now lets see if Solitude takes the appeal route. Alta's expansion would almost be a death knell to backcountry access in the area. Plus the skiing in the proposed area absolutely sucks on all but the best days.

Last edited by cololi; Aug 25, 2010 at 2:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2286  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2010, 9:49 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,122
What expansion plans for Alta and Snowbird? Anybody have a link?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2287  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 2:03 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,292


Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Snowbird proposing second tram, expansion into back side gulch - Recreation » The resort would build a new tram if feds approve its planned expansion.

By Mike Gorrell
The Salt Lake Tribune


Snowbird is seeking U.S. Forest Service approval to expand into another canyon off its back side -- Mary Ellen Gulch, adjacent to Mineral Basin.

Providing access: A new tram would run from Hidden Peak to the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks.



Tribune file photo by Photo by Francisco Kjolseth Maine tourists Katie King and Trevor McVey get a majestic view from Snowbird's Hidden Peak. Even broader views could be had from the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks, which is 500 feet higher, if Snowbird receives Forest Service approval of its expansion proposal. (Francisco Kjolseth)

"That will be a pretty dramatic ride," Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort President Bob Bonar said of vistas from the tram, which would rise from 11,000 feet to the West Twin's 11,489-foot summit.

Bonar submitted a proposed master plan amendment last month to the Forest Service's Salt Lake Ranger District.

District Ranger Cathy Kahlow said her staff is evaluating the proposal and will decide by late summer or early fall whether to accept it. If accepted, she noted,

expansion portions will require a full-blown environmental impact statement and changes to the Wasatch-Cache-Uinta National Forest plan.



That process seems certain to spark considerable interest, from the protectors of Salt Lake City's watershed to the conservationists who support Save Our Canyons, which is generally opposed to resort expansion in the Wasatch.

"It's another ski area expansion where resorts take public lands and give up nothing in return," said Save Our Canyons Executive Director Carl Fisher.

The envisioned expansion would add 780 acres of Mary Ellen Gulch into the resort's boundary. Bonar said Snowbird owns about half of the land already through the acquisition of mining claims; the Forest Service manages the rest.

Under U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson's Wasatch Mountain wilderness proposal, Snowbird could acquire even more lands in Mary Ellen Gulch in exchange for resort-owned parcels on the north side of Little Cottonwood Canyon, on mounts Flagstaff and Superior.

The top of the gulch offers "more of the same great powder terrain Snowbird already has for advanced skiers and boarders," said Bonar.


Tribune file photo by Chris Detrick In this file photo, Rex and Opal Fielder of West Memphis, Ark. walk up a slope toward Snowbird's Tram on Hidden Peak, which the resort's new master plan proposal describes as the jumping off point for a new tram to the top of American Fork Twins Peak and access to 780 acres of skiing on the resort's back side.

Mary Ellen Gulch's terrain also seems well-suited to spring skiing, important to a resort whose last day this season is June 20, said Snowbird spokesman Jared Ishkanian. It also is not used extensively by backcountry skiers, minimizing a flash point of controversy over use of the Wasatch Range, he added.

From the bottom of Mary Ellen, a proposed lift would carry skiers and boarders to "Sinners Pass" ridge, where they can descend into Mineral Basin. Snowbird wants to lengthen the Mineral Basin Express chairlift by about 50 percent to pick up these riders and to add about 1,000 feet of intermediate-to-beginner slope at the bottom.

The extended Express lift would take riders back to Hidden Peak, completing a loop.


Snow blankets the hillside and a chairlift at Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort, which received 4 inches at the base and 8 inches atop Hidden Peak on Monday. Photo credits should go to Matt Crawley/Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort.

While experts will benefit from that expansion, Snowbird also wants to improve its opportunities for beginners. It is asking to put a lift up a gently sloping hill on the north side of Little Cottonwood Creek, directly across from Baby Thunder Lift, on the resort's down-canyon end. A bridge over the creek would connect the new beginner area to Baby Thunder.

Nine of Snowbird's 13 proposals address projects currently in the resort, such as adding night skiing along Gadzoom lift, adding onto the Mid-Gad and Gad Valley day lodges and developing new bike trails and service roads.

Save Our Canyons' Fisher was disappointed Snowbird submitted the plan now, while wilderness bill talks are in the early stages. "This master plan amendment is not really holding up the end of the deal we thought we had worked on with Snowbird," he said.

Jeff Niermeyer, Salt Lake City's director of public utilities, said he was pleased that most new activity is proposed for outside of the Salt Lake Valley's prime watershed. But he pledged to watch the proposal closely to ensure water quality is not affected.

Longtime backcountry skier Bob Athey said the main reason he doesn't ski Mary Ellen Gulch is that access was cut off by Snowbird's development of Mineral Basin. "Snowbird has no purpose and no need," he said. "Ask Bob Bonar, 'When is enough enough?' "

[email protected]

What is Snowbird's 10-year master plan?
Boundary expansion in Mary Ellen Gulch and Mineral Basin

A tram from Hidden Peak to the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks

A new chairlift in Mary Ellen Gulch, extension of the Mineral Basin Lift

Development of a beginner skier area, with a lift, below resort's lower entry

Creation of more mountain biking trails

Installation of night skiing along Gadzoom Lift

Making Gad II a high-speed detachable lift

Renovations to the Mid-Gad and Gad Valley day lodges, General Gritts store

Expansion of lift maintenance, disabled skiing offices

Addition of yurt to Baby Thunder area

Source » Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2288  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2010, 1:40 AM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PRMD - People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 2,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
The contract for the building itself has not been awarded, but Kiewit is doing some site prep. work.
From previous readings a couple of months ago, the contract is suppose to be awarded sometime in October. Of course that may change or may have already.
__________________
"I measure the value of life not by how much I have, instead by what I have done.

-sb
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2289  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2010, 2:53 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
September was last I heard.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2290  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2010, 11:49 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,292
Work revives on stalled Eaglewood Village in North Salt Lake

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/neighbo...-lowe.html.csp


www.eaglewoodvillage.net

More than three years ago, Draper-based Compass Development Group got approval from North Salt Lake’s City Council to build an ambitious mixed-use development on old gravel-pit land at the city’s south entrance.

Then the economy took a nose-dive, leaving the 96 mountainside acres to languish. But that scenario could soon change...



Mixed-use development in North Salt Lake restarted A multimillion-dollar mixed-use development just off Beck Street in North Salt Lake has been restarted after a months-long hiatus. Eaglewood Village would contain retail pads, offices and a mix of town homes and apartments on two tiers.

» At total build-out, Eaglewood Village could contain 570 residential units and 18 acres of retail and office space.
Source: Compass Development


.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2291  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2010, 6:51 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,122
This is good news! IMO, more housing development needs to occur to the north and north west of downtown SLC. That's one reason why dt SLC struggles, is because it is fighting against development in the south end of the SL valley and the north end of Utah valley. Those forces continually pull away from dt SLC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2292  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2010, 7:03 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
I forgot all about the " Eaglewood Village" development. Wasn't ground broken back in 2008 or sometime around there? Grad to hear work come start back up again soon. I think this development ( when finish ) will be a great sight to see while driving on the I-15 to or from downtown.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2293  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2010, 1:28 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
NSL has seen a lot of gentrification, with Legacy and the Foxboro development around it, and now this.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2294  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2010, 2:22 AM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
When they stopped the development of Eaglewood Village, they had put in the curb and gutter for the road through it and that was it. Then about a month ago, they came in and put the asphalt to it and it now connects onto the round-about there in NSL. I will try to grab an updated shot this weekend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2295  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2010, 2:43 AM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PRMD - People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 2,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
This is good news! IMO, more housing development needs to occur to the north and north west of downtown SLC. That's one reason why dt SLC struggles, is because it is fighting against development in the south end of the SL valley and the north end of Utah valley. Those forces continually pull away from dt SLC.
I understand your point. However I view Downtown and North SLC as two different markets; different atmosphere and surrounding ameneties.

Though it is always good news when a stalled project starts to once again move forward.
__________________
"I measure the value of life not by how much I have, instead by what I have done.

-sb
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2296  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2010, 3:56 AM
airhero airhero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
This is good news! IMO, more housing development needs to occur to the north and north west of downtown SLC. That's one reason why dt SLC struggles, is because it is fighting against development in the south end of the SL valley and the north end of Utah valley. Those forces continually pull away from dt SLC.
The refineries and the Staker-Parson Co. site along with the ugly, worn-down buildings and a very noticeable lack of vegetation make the area between Salt Lake and Bountiful hideous. The commute is terrible , I mean, traffic isn't usually bad, but the sight and the smell are not pleasing (prime example: the Southern Exposure building and the stench coming from the refineries). I've always wondered if there has ever been an attempt or even a proposal (by someone of influence) to clean up the area between Salt Lake and North Salt Lake. Of course, Eaglewood Village should be a good start. I do remember getting my hopes up for this three or so years ago, and then wondering what happened (well, not really wondering, because we all know why most projects have been getting delayed in most places lately) but I'm getting them up again. It'll sure be an improvement from the hole of nothingness that currently resides there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2297  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2010, 12:56 PM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
This is good news! IMO, more housing development needs to occur to the north and north west of downtown SLC. That's one reason why dt SLC struggles, is because it is fighting against development in the south end of the SL valley and the north end of Utah valley. Those forces continually pull away from dt SLC.
Good point. The refineries having really had a negative impact on the area.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2298  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 1:15 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,292
West Jordan mulls future of old Sugar Factory

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/7...r-Factory.html

...What once stood as a bustling sugar-processing plant at 8200 S. 2200 West could be transformed into an arts academy using city impact fees. Or it could be torn down and the money spent on a park...


West Jordan resident Ben Thompson, left, and former Mayor David Newton stand in front of the city's old Sugar Factory. (Keith Johnson, Deseret News)

.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2299  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 4:39 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108

"None of us are against the arts," said Melissa Worthen, resident of the 550-home Sycamores development on the far west side of the city. "But these are our impact fees, and we want a park. We want a beautiful area with trees and grass — places for our kids to play. We don't have one walkable area."

ummmm there's already a large park right behind the Sugar Factory. It's called the West Jordan City Park. Not really sure what that lady is talking about.
Since I live right in that area I should also have a say. I say lets keep the "Sugar Factory" and make them a icon for the city of West Jordan.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2300  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 11:17 PM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
112-Unit apartment community to be built in South Salt Lake

The article in The Enterprise states that it is located at 2550 S Main St. Developed by Park City based SEEC Enterprises and will be called Brickstone on Main. It will 4 3-story residential buildings with a pair of two-story buildings and one recreational building. These are the same people who are just completing the Brick Stone Apartments on 33rd right now. They are currently awaiting HUD financing on the project to purchase the land and build the project. They hope to start in January 2011 and think it will take 11 months.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:02 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.