HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #22721  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 3:36 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Looks like this has broken ground at Chicago/Larrabee. I love the idea of putting new retail podiums on these towers-in-a-park, even if this particular "park" is beautiful and well-manicured. Let's hope this starts a trend.
Interesting, but cool. Which company is behind this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22722  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 4:09 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
More Bronzeville news. If you recall before, there were about 3 new buildings receiving building permits around the 43rd St Green Line stop for Legends south. Well, this time it's way more and right around the 47th St Green Line stop for Legends South.

* 4716 S Calumet - 3 stories, 6 units. Vacant lot.
* 4724 S Calumet - 3 stories, 3 units. Vacant lot.
* 4728 S Calumet - 3 stories, 3 units. Vacant lot.
* 4736 S Calumet - 3 stories, 6 units. Vacant lot.
* 4742 S Calumet - 3 stories, 5 units. Vacant lot.
* 4744 S Calumet - 3 stories, 3 units. Vacant lot.
* 4826 S Calumet - 3 stories, 6 units. Vacant lot.
* 4830 S Calumet - 3 stories, 3 units. Vacant lot.

Total: 8 new buildings, 35 new units. Then I believe another 10 or so units up around the 43rd St stop. So far...
This is likely replacement housing for the former Robert Taylor. Probably a mix of market rate, affordable and public housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22723  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 4:17 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
This is likely replacement housing for the former Robert Taylor. Probably a mix of market rate, affordable and public housing.
I think the RTH were a little west of that actually..I think they only went as east as State, so these would be just outside of it I believe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22724  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 6:22 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Looks like this has broken ground at Chicago/Larrabee. I love the idea of putting new retail podiums on these towers-in-a-park, even if this particular "park" is beautiful and well-manicured. Let's hope this starts a trend.

^ I'm definitely a fan of this concept.

Actually, I'd like to see things like this built along the parking lots of some of the more suburban shopping centers that have been built in the city. I'm thinking of Roosevelt/Canal and the North/Clybourn districts
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22725  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 7:04 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Definitely could have used all this new retail around when I worked at 600 W Chicago. Other than Snarf's and Motel Bar in the building, options were pretty slim -- which helped turn the building into one of the biggest food truck hubs.

With groupon on shaky footing I'm not sure if any more development will be needed, but I've always thought that the building's parking garage across Larabee could have had a few retail spots slapped on without much trouble. Still, it's interesting to see growth radiate out from the building. Also, infill is nice. I agree that this building's park was pretty well-maintained, but it always made the corner feel strange -- trapped between two worlds.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22726  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 7:28 PM
paytonc's Avatar
paytonc paytonc is offline
pragmatist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: beautiful as well as sanitary DC
Posts: 228
FWIW, Rahm is in DC this week on relatively short notice. I suspect there's fundraising involved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Looks like flatiron buildings are in vogue again. A good thing, as I've always been a big fan of them
Parking requirements made them nearly impossible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
my dreams of having Whole Foods land there may just be squashed (unless they have a smaller dense urban format, of which I'm not aware)
I highly doubt there'll ever be a WFM inside the Loop, especially now that they've scooped up all of those Dominick's locations.
__________________
draft SUV drivers first
http://westnorth.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22727  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 7:51 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Looks like this has broken ground at Chicago/Larrabee. I love the idea of putting new retail podiums on these towers-in-a-park, even if this particular "park" is beautiful and well-manicured. Let's hope this starts a trend.

Awesome, I have been wanting a coffee shop with a clear view of the crack deals that go down on Chicago Ave from the rowhouse residents delivering to residents outside the police circle around them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22728  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:21 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
^ I think this little retail building is great, although for slightly different reasons than you...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22729  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:22 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by paytonc View Post


I highly doubt there'll ever be a WFM inside the Loop, especially now that they've scooped up all of those Dominick's locations.


Quite possibly will end up the case, althouth it would be an oversight/missed opportunity for them
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22730  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:28 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
You know as well as I that the economics are totally different. Privately-owned buildings need to generate revenue to cover their construction costs, so the construction budget is relative to the earning power of the site and its entitlements. On civic buildings, the budget is whatever you can wring out of the taxpayers. Maybe you look at other similar projects to get a ballpark figure... and cost overruns are far more common.

Even if Jahn turned out bargain-basement designs, I'm sure his fees are extremely high because his overhead is high... that penthouse in the Jewelers Building doesn't come cheap. That's fine for Chinese and Arabian businessmen on a power trip or German companies with a taste for good architecture but it doesn't jive with Chicago's private sector. Come to think of it, when was the last time any "global" Chicago firm did anything local? Smith/Gill? SOM?

Yes, this is a very 'classic' interpretation of public sector property development. However, my point was that depending on the development model being employed in the private sector (who the developer is, their business model, and capital source(s), exit strategy, etc), the lines may be a little more blurred than you think, that's all....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22731  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:46 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
I think the RTH were a little west of that actually..I think they only went as east as State, so these would be just outside of it I believe.
Right, but part of the plan was to integrate and "de densify" the units around that area. So I think this is part of that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22732  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:50 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Quite possibly will end up the case, althouth it would be an oversight/missed opportunity for them
whole foods has done a pretty thorough job encircling the loop with stores - south loop & rivernorth, with west loop and streeterville opening within a year or so.

i think most major grocers are just scared of opening a store without accessory on-site parking (structured or otherwise). their standard business model of people stopping by the store once a week and purchasing $100-$200 of goods all at one time necessitates on-site car storage. i think if these grocers thought smaller they might find that there's a market in the heart of the loop that could sustain a small format store supported by walk-in business, especially if it catered heavily to loop office lunch goers interested in healthier prepared stuff - hot bars/salad bars/sushi counter/etc.

it might work, but inertia keeps the major grocers towards the more fringe areas of downtown (south loop, west loop, rivernorth, streeterville, LSE) because accessory parking is easier (cheaper) to come by in those areas.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22733  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 8:58 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,457
George Lucas Gives $25 Million to U of C for New Film School


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/02/...o-lab-schools/

Any idea who the architect is?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22734  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 9:19 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
The Architect of the proposed Arts Hall is VDTA
http://www.buildordie.com/project/uc...d-renovations/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22735  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 9:23 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
George Lucas Gives $25 Million to U of C for New Film School


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/02/...o-lab-schools/

Any idea who the architect is?

https://news.uchicago.edu/article/20...rant-arts-hall
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22736  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2014, 11:33 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Right, but part of the plan was to integrate and "de densify" the units around that area. So I think this is part of that.
Yeah, don't remember that of course, but de densify seems...backwards here? All these are on vacant lots. Or are you talking about de densifying the already existing units in that area?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22737  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2014, 3:13 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post

i think most major grocers are just scared of opening a store without accessory on-site parking (structured or otherwise). their standard business model of people stopping by the store once a week and purchasing $100-$200 of goods.

But with Whole Foods, that's like, what - 5-10 items, on average? Hardly need a car for that! In all seriousness, I agree with your assessment - flexibility and quick adoption of lucrative new formats are strengths of precious few retailers. I would also add that neither are understanding (let alone capitalizing on) areas with varied/diverse sources and types of demand - most actually really suck at this, as they strongly prefer trade areas/submarkets/micromarkets that conform to a small number of simple, single-driver 'archetypes'....this is actually just one way in which retailers are typically deleteriously risk-adverse.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22738  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2014, 4:19 AM
pip's Avatar
pip pip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,336
finally a new construction building I like!


So much better then that new school building in LSE and that building on Milwaukee and Division
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22739  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2014, 5:08 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,293
^ Big budgets lead to nice things. That folding glass is pretty bad ass. I haven't quite warmed up yet to the stone portal things but they'll probably end up looking real nice when built. I get that they are a nod to the general shapes and rhythms to neighboring buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22740  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2014, 5:10 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
^ Big budgets lead to nice things. That folding glass is pretty bad ass. I haven't quite warmed up yet to the stone portal things but they'll probably end up looking real nice when built. I get that they are a nod to the general shapes and rhythms to neighboring buildings.
Agreed - it kind of seems weird or out of place to me but hopefully in real life it looks better
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.