HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2241  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2010, 11:28 PM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
it's all about the culture, vancouver never developed a sense of fashion, but at the same time, who would wear high fashion in their cars, or going to a grocery store in the suburbs...it's all about street life, and urban atomosphere
     
     
  #2242  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 12:57 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Arrow

Chic shopping districts known around the world are found in "world class" cities, and one of the elements of a "world class" city, despite how much slick architecture or fancy features you pour into it is, as someone somewhere on this site pointed out: history.

World class cities are usally fairly big (a little bigger than Vancouver is now, and on up) and they've been around long enough to become mature, seasoned cities with a sense of history and importance, despite what ever that's modern and sleek they may have.

Vancouver is just emerging from being a "metropolis in the woods." It has a history as a seaport and mill town, and not too much else, other than the people eand events known only to Vancouverites.

And although a lot of people have moved here with money in their pockets, it does not have a corporate base or an economy of scale, like Montreal, Toronto, or Seattle.

Vancouver as we all know is a lovely city with many innovative features, and a lot of green space, which is great.

But to quote a Peruvian proverb: "You can dress a monkey in satin, but the monkey remains nevertheless a monkey."
     
     
  #2243  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 5:46 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Rick checks out the inner workings at YVR as they prepare to welcome the world.
Video Link
     
     
  #2244  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 5:52 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Chic shopping districts known around the world are found in "world class" cities, and one of the elements of a "world class" city, despite how much slick architecture or fancy features you pour into it is, as someone somewhere on this site pointed out: history.

World class cities are usally fairly big (a little bigger than Vancouver is now, and on up) and they've been around long enough to become mature, seasoned cities with a sense of history and importance, despite what ever that's modern and sleek they may have.

Vancouver is just emerging from being a "metropolis in the woods." It has a history as a seaport and mill town, and not too much else, other than the people eand events known only to Vancouverites.

And although a lot of people have moved here with money in their pockets, it does not have a corporate base or an economy of scale, like Montreal, Toronto, or Seattle.

Vancouver as we all know is a lovely city with many innovative features, and a lot of green space, which is great.

But to quote a Peruvian proverb: "You can dress a monkey in satin, but the monkey remains nevertheless a monkey."
i think it's still in the woods.
     
     
  #2245  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 6:58 AM
Waders Waders is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Rick checks out the inner workings at YVR as they prepare to welcome the world.
Video Link
lol. That video is fun to watch.
     
     
  #2246  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 11:05 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,013
if you can afford to live here your mortage is probably a huge chunk of your monthly expenses, and than by the time all your bills are paid who can afford a $1000 ralph lauren track suit?

I remember when living here was cheaper - there were a lot of brands that we have lost since the huge real estate price jump - it just goes to show that we aren't a city with a large disposable income to keep most shops afloat on our own - we do need tourism and visitors to keep the shops going and if you have the shopping money why would you choose to shop in vancouver over san francisco, london or new york? or toronto or la or etc etc
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #2247  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 5:30 PM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
If anything, I see more brand names nowadays... I think the wealth has more than kept pace...
     
     
  #2248  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2010, 9:54 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,013
we lost versus, istante, romeo gigli, polo ralph lauren, Sonia Rykiel, Valentino, Celine plus a few more - all those brands had stores here prior to 1995
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #2249  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 4:36 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
we lost versus, istante, romeo gigli, polo ralph lauren, Sonia Rykiel, Valentino, Celine plus a few more - all those brands had stores here prior to 1995
Bet your bottom dollar you'll find at least some of them in Seattle
     
     
  #2250  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 6:30 AM
Rusty Gull's Avatar
Rusty Gull Rusty Gull is offline
Site 8 Lives
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver's North Shore
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
we lost versus, istante, romeo gigli, polo ralph lauren, Sonia Rykiel, Valentino, Celine plus a few more - all those brands had stores here prior to 1995
More importantly, we also lost Hooter's.
     
     
  #2251  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 7:10 AM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
I thought you meant brand name merchandise, not stores. My bad.
     
     
  #2252  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 5:27 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
JAL has applied for bankruptcy protecttion. It looks like Delta & it's alliance partners are the front runners to takeover the airline. If Delta wins that may mean Seattle gets the Tokyo route instead of Vanvouver. Although the Tokyo Vancouver route is a profitable route.
     
     
  #2253  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 6:32 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Delta Airlines (and United) already operates Seattle - Tokyo, and will start Seattle - Osaka soon, there would be no incentive for them to add an additional flight by a technically "competing" airline.
     
     
  #2254  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2010, 11:28 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
noticed a while back that alaska canceled direct service to sfo out of yvr. used to be 3x daily with 4x some days, but i guess it makes sense to them to route folks through cheaper portland and seatac connections (in terms of leases), it's a point of general knowledge that sfo and yvr fall on the expensive side of the equation.

but it's still hella annoying, and alaska has definitely lost my business once i use up my miles. when alaska dropped out, it got me onto the ac/united direct (to my own amazement, as air canada has been on my "no fly" list since they wiped out 50k miles in the 2009 rollover).
     
     
  #2255  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2010, 1:40 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Question and Delta?


Westjet may move in to take up the "slack" if there is any market space left. They're in Expansion mode. Also, does Delta no longer fly SFO -YVR nonstop?

I am familiar with the History of Delta buying Western (and of course that route) 20+ years ago (rode 'em both. *Family in SF and LA), and I thought they might have "tenure" .Apparently it went to largely Alaska, & now they're pulling back.

My question: does Delta still fly that route and if not, when did they pull out? I'd really like know the carrier history of that route, and LA and SAN D routes better, too.
Thanks
     
     
  #2256  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 5:10 AM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
tro, for your information - none of those stores are in Seattle (well, Lauren might be now), and if they were they'd be empty (except for you Canadians coming down, perhaps).

You all think Vancouver is a 'show' city, but Seattle is even more so - because you all think it is so big and glamourous. But in reality, it's not. Not anywhere close to New York, Chicago, LA, SF, Miami, Dallas; not in the same ballpark.

Most of the high end stores, Seattle JUST got in the last 2-4 years. In fact, we FINALLY have a true high end department store, Nieman Marcus, but it is in Bellevue and is ONLY due to Microsoft's desire to create an edge city market for recruiting purposes. I once worked at corporate Microsoft, so I am well aware of the expansion plans we had for Lincoln Square and the Bravern development (both downtown Bellevue). The Seattle space was through acquisitions.

And yes, Seattle does have a high-tech economy with several hq's. But Boeing is based in Chicago and has been scaling back since (and soon will probably pull out altogether). Microsoft is not the place it used to be and realize they hired WAY TOO MANY people to support an industry dominated by SF bay companies.

You all have mentioned that we have many rich people here, but so do you. And the 'rich' people here are actually stock rich. That wealth RARELY flows liquid into the "seattle economy" because we don't have state income tax to coax it out. And we're just now getting stores worthy of not going down to Portland (or up to Vancouver) to shop.

Trof - you seemed surprised that Oneworld's HQ is in Vancouver; I think you and many others would be very surprised how big Van actually is in the world stage. It is Canada's 3rd largest city and market, that alone places it a significant advantage against Seattle and the much more competitive US market. Vancouver is a world player and would be even moreso if your government would let the city achieve it's destiny as the Singapore/Hong Kong of North America - but instead, your government insists on having everything in Toronto - THAT holds Vancouver back, whether it's international flights to Europe or Asia (outside the rim), corporate hq locations, or media/fashion. Vancouver is much more dominent on international trade and this will become very evident once Boeing does shift all commercial production out. Did you all ever realize, that Microsoft almost moved it's world headquarters to Vancouver?

Those office towers many of you admire so much in downtown Seattle are 30% empty (I read recently in the Seattle times) as they've overbuilt due to speculation and EVERY bank that once was headquartered here are gone. So, if it weren't for high tech and internet innovation (and sheer will of Microsoft), Seattle would have long been a ghost town - look at how Seattle lost the Sonics for example. (govt and corporate Seattle couldnt' get it together, ending up losing to an up and coming darkhorse city in Oklahoma City whose corporate/govt entities are hell bent on showcasing their town and have the cash to do it).

I know Vancouver lost the Grizz to an even worse city of Memphis, but that was the NBA's fault almost exclusively in that they really needed to seed Vancouver and make the hockey town into a basketball city; whereas the Sonics leaving was the EXCLUSIVE fault of Washington/Seattle govt and corporate/wealth you all think so much of. Now, how could 'such a prominent city' with a longstanding NBA presence - lose it's NBA team? Since we are so rich, whatever whatever.

Seattle does have one advantage over Vancouver, and that is taxation (or the lack thereof). But it's starting to catch up with us, as our state government is $2.5billion shortfall THIS YEAR ALONE (city of Seattle and King County also have huge deficits, I just forget how much) and our infrastructure is crumbling as I type. The next few years will NOT be good times for Seattle, and I for one will be relocating to a much larger much more prominent city - that is Chicago.

But I wanted to make those points, that Seattle isn't quite as well off as you all think we are. We have some advantages but we also have severe penis envy over Vancouver too. There's some things you guys dont even realize you have or advantages you have moreso than just having a subway while we dont.

I think some people need to travel a bit more, and AWAY from Toronto or Seattle - to really sense the impact Vancouver has. You can get to a lot more places worldwide right in your own front yard than you can coming down here (and would have even more if your government would let Vancouver prosper naturally, like it naturally would). Seattle's rich people mostly fly corporate jets and RARELY fly international (and when they do, they go to an international gateway city such as Vancouver or LA or SF/Chicago/NY like everybody else).

Vancouver reminds me of that fine girl who has many things hidden away but doesn't show off much - she just surprises you and continues to amaze you with the things she continually wears day to day. People worldwide love this pretty girl and want to go to bed with her and her less pretty older cousin SF. Vancouver may be quite shallow and not have much personality but damn, she sure is charming and very beautiful - so I and many men worldwide want to buy her things and amaze in her beauty (and give her gifts that her peer cities envy).

I see Seattle as the not so pretty sister of Vancouver who has a better education and somewhat better job than Vancouver, but somehow still gets left out to while her spoiled sister 100 miles north gets all of the attention from the best guys.

Just for kicks, I see Toronto as that blowhard bully trying to look the part of big city but really can't compete with the big boys show up. He wouldn't have what he has if it wasn't for his fairy god mother Ottawa who thinks the world of him and therefore thinks Toronto should have everything. Ottawa doesn't need to worry about that pretty girl on the west coast, because she is so quiet - yet Toronto is always whining when guys prefer Vancouver, so Ottawa makes up for it.

a bit of humor at the end - but it really is my take on the aformentioned cities.
     
     
  #2257  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 5:18 AM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,580
If that's not the biggest confidence booster to us Vancouverites, I don't know what is. I am totally blushing now
     
     
  #2258  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 5:23 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
tro, for your information - none of those stores are in Seattle (well, Lauren might be now), and if they were they'd be empty (except for you Canadians coming down, perhaps).

[...]
Wow. You made my day.

That post needs to be printed and framed at the Vancouver Art Gallery and paired alongside with Emily Carr. It's absolutely beautiful.

Last edited by mr.x; Jan 29, 2010 at 6:19 AM.
     
     
  #2259  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 6:18 AM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,086
hot_rod, your cheque's in the mail. haha.
     
     
  #2260  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:09 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
ya, vancouver got everything, except height and economic power

it is just a town with a high profile of service sector, and some view...

with a lot of amentities for a population this small...

becoming hk or singapore, first the govenrment needs to give the city a free economy and more political freedom...sth like protecting toronto and air canada is garbage to vancouver...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.