HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #22281  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2014, 10:34 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
The Rogers Park one in Gateway Center and a few others I'm sure.
there are two in rogers park: the gateway center one and the one at ridge/pratt across the street from the S&C plant.

there's also one down in southshore, and one up in norwood park at milwaukee/devon.

still, other than those 4 out in peripheral areas, 10 of the 11 other dominick's locations in the city have found buyers.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Jan 31, 2014 at 10:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22282  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2014, 10:36 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
two in rogers park- the gateway center one and the one at ridge/pratt.

and there are a couple pretty deep on the south side too, i forget the exact locations.
Right, so there are like 5-6 in the city left and like 40+ in the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22283  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 12:51 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
Still, Feldstein said “major concerns” remain about traffic and parking that will likely require making some streets one-way while putting cul-de-sacs on others. ...
I am not familiar with this new definition of the verb "require."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22284  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 2:29 AM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Here's to hoping that the Division/Clybourn one never gets bought.

I want to see that site redeveloped so badly...
It could use a good structure fire to accelerate the process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22285  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 5:30 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Is anybody familiar with the property that McCormick & Schmick's sits on (1 E Wacker)? Is that land part of one of the neighboring towers' parcels? It just struck me how odd it is to have a 1.5 story building sitting on Wacker, part of the main branch canyon which is on the way towards total buildout.

It does allow a nice bit of breathing room between the towers on either side, but it seems like if that land is self-contained that eventually market forces will require it be used for more than a restaurant.

(I'm staying at the Langham this weekend, so seeing the restaurant from above for the first time made me think of this.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22286  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 8:16 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
I'm pretty sure that was developed in conjunction with the Kemper (United of America) Building, deliberately put there to allow windows on the east side of the building. You have the same thing at a number of buildings: 180 North LaSalle, 200 North LaSalle, 190 South LaSalle, 181 West Madison.

Last edited by Mr Downtown; Feb 1, 2014 at 8:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22287  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 9:23 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
I'm pretty sure that was developed in conjunction with the Kemper (United of America) Building, deliberately put there to allow windows on the east side of the building. You have the same thing at a number of buildings: 180 North LaSalle, 200 North LaSalle, 190 South LaSalle, 181 West Madison.
That's what I started thinking. It looks like it's attached to Kemper (wasn't that Unitrin or something before?). If they did something like the proposed annex to 360 N Mich, a bunch of people would lose their views.

Unless that restaurant is the Chicago landmark someone's supposed to cantilever over...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22288  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2014, 10:16 PM
Justin_Chicago Justin_Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 377
Is Gems Phase 2 starting this year? I can see Phase 1 from my office and the windows are almost complete. I was under the impression that Magellan was going to develop the lot between Aqua and BCBS next.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22289  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 3:59 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
RiverWalk work - 2014




Jan 22


Jan 31
The old steel cap and a few extracted piles


The pointy end of the pile




Work on the S bank between Clark and LaSalle


An between Dearborn and Clark
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22290  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 4:41 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
If I remember correctly the Clark-Lasalle section, which seems to be where they're starting, will be the "river theater" section. Mainly a huge amphitheater style stairstep going from the sidewalk level to the riverwalk level. Not the most auspicious of the riverwalk sections, but one of the more important because it's how most of the foot traffic will move between the two levels.

I might have the blocks confused though.

Also, here's hoping they don't spring a leak and flood half the city again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22291  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 9:58 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,896
Are there plans for the riverwalk to build out more business tenant spaces?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22292  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 1:59 PM
Pilton Pilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
If I remember correctly the Clark-Lasalle section, which seems to be where they're starting, will be the "river theater" section. Mainly a huge amphitheater style stairstep going from the sidewalk level to the riverwalk level. Not the most auspicious of the riverwalk sections, but one of the more important because it's how most of the foot traffic will move between the two levels.

I might have the blocks confused though.

Also, here's hoping they don't spring a leak and flood half the city again.
harry has labeled the 2 locations shown correctly. Dearborn-Clark, known as The Cove and Clark-Lasalle, known as The River Theater. Link to River Theater: http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...verTheater.pdf

Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Are there plans for the riverwalk to build out more business tenant spaces?
See link for planned kayak rental at The Cove: http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...al/TheCove.pdf

The plan is to have some licensed businesses along the expanded Riverwalk provide revenue to help pay back the federal loan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22293  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 3:15 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Love the way they included the Water Taxi in both renders.

For those who haven't tried it - cheap and easy.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22294  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 4:37 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,474
A few rental businesses will not provide enough revenue to cover $100M of debt (plus interest). The bulk of the repayment will have to come from TIF. Hopefully the project results in much greater assessed values for property in the area.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22295  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 5:57 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Are USDOT loans even expected to be paid back? I picture them being more like grants. But between that and the river lighting Rahm just announced/proposed I think it will be a pretty powerful engine to pump humans (and their leaky wallets) from Michigan Avenue into the Loop, which should be good for everyone. Tourist money is probably heavily concentrated around Michigan, with small splashes around Willis. Imagine the street-friendly businesses that will pop up once tourists start wandering around Wacker and the NW Loop (where coincidentally a big crop of national chain hotels are sprouting).

The river improvements excite me to no end (obviously) because I think it could be huge for tourism, the same way Millennium Park was. "Hey, Chicago's got this new river thing. Let's go there this summer."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22296  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 6:21 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilton View Post
See link for planned kayak rental at The Cove: http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...al/TheCove.pdf

The plan is to have some licensed businesses along the expanded Riverwalk provide revenue to help pay back the federal loan.
Eh, The Cove is not what I had in mind. I think The Marina is more like it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22297  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 6:23 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
The river improvements excite me to no end (obviously) because I think it could be huge for tourism, the same way Millennium Park was. "Hey, Chicago's got this new river thing. Let's go there this summer."
Possibly, but I think this is only more of a reality if they put places to eat/drink down there as well as being able to more easily rent kayaks and such. I think the lighting of it, if done correctly, will add the attractive factor. There's many world cities with eateries and such along their major bodies of water.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22298  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 6:45 PM
chicagogreg chicagogreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 55
The stair amphitheater section excites me most as well—it's surprisingly hard to get down to river level as of now (even access to the architectural boat tours require a few flights of old, unattractive stairs) but access should be greatly improved with the renovation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22299  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 7:07 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
Are USDOT loans even expected to be paid back? I picture them being more like grants.
Of course. That's why they're loans. Many TIFIA projects are toll roads, which generate lots of revenue to pay back the loan. The interest rate on the Riverwalk loan is only 3.33% on a 35-year schedule, which is (IIRC) less than what the city could get by selling bonds and less than what a P3 investor would demand, so it's an attractive way to finance any kind of transportation project.

As far as I can tell, the city plans to pay the debt to the Feds using gas tax proceeds. Rent from tenant businesses might reduce that a little bit but they're still just a drop in the bucket.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22300  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2014, 8:07 PM
Pilton Pilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 281
^ I said "help" not "cover.". Taxpayers will provide far more revenue to help to repay the loan than licenses like the kayak rental concession or restaurants/bars like the Park Grill. The licenses will provide lucrative business opportunities. But, this is Chicago (lol!) and providing revenue to "help" pay the loan will be mentioned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.