The entire lagoon wont be filled in, but it wont be an endless pit anymore either. They are adding banks that have been dredged, and creating a wetland type habitat.
There is more infomation on this project here
http://www.deq.state.or.us/nwr/Ross_...update0106.pdf
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougall
i think a beach in the south waterfront would attract families with children because all kids like the beach. and i know that in the pearl there are very little families with kids so the south waterfront should try to make attractions for different age groups thus attracting more families with children. and if there is sand the ross island that must not be bothering the fish so a beach couldn't hurt
|
with all due respect, attracting families to the Pearl has more to do with housing options and affordability than it has to do with families needing additional amenities. Have you ever been to Jamison Square on a sunny summer day? No kids in the Pearl, hardly, you can hear them from blocks away. With an additional and largest Pearl park yet to be built, as well as the North Park blocks only a few blocks away, the area is prime for families. However, you wont find many families of 4 in a two bedroom $450,000 condo.
As nice as a beach in Portland would be, especially in SoWa, it would destroy the entire notion of sustainability. We aren't supposed to create footprints for our own pleasures, we need to learn how to co-exist with nature. Returning the Willamette River banks back to their natural status completes the vision of SoWa...green towers that use much less energy than current buildings, recycling of wastes, mass transit options over additional roadways, and the integration of workplaces, universities, and homes in one location is all about promoting a new thinking about the way we live. Could you imagine tearing out a large section of the riverbank and trucking in sand? It would be a disgrace to the vision.
Families don't need beaches, they need affordable homes, greenspaces, good schools, and a sense of community.