HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2018, 7:41 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Gas prices went up 10 cents per litre over the past week to pad gas companies' wallets, and you're getting the pitchforks out over a 1.5 cent increase that'll go towards transportation improvments for the region that will actually help you out? Maybe think about switching your anger towards the right target.
I'm very much in favour of transit investment, and government revenue generating and spending overall, but what I don't understand is why permanent taxes have to be raised every time we want to built a one-time capital expense. Taxes went up for the Evergreen Line, it was built, and now we still have their revenue. But now we have to raise taxes permanently again for our next wave of projects? And I imagine the same after these are built? I can't say I'm like mad about it or anything, and I know all cities across North America do it, I just don't understand why they have to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2018, 7:55 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I'm very much in favour of transit investment, and government revenue generating and spending overall, but what I don't understand is why permanent taxes have to be raised every time we want to built a one-time capital expense. Taxes went up for the Evergreen Line, it was built, and now we still have their revenue. But now we have to raise taxes permanently again for our next wave of projects? And I imagine the same after these are built? I can't say I'm like mad about it or anything, and I know all cities across North America do it, I just don't understand why they have to.
To account for inflation?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2018, 3:36 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by jawagord View Post
You are forgetting about the existing pipeline, it will be dedicated to refined products, gasoline and diesel and some light oils, so the capacity to transport gasoline to Burnaby will be 'huge" coming from the refineries with the lowest cost crude in North America. FYI the WS and California refiners will "add on" capacity as needed, they have been doing so for decades, it just won't be needed by Vancouver if the TMP is twinned.
Why would the existing pipeline mix change? Clearly it's at the highest profitability for the owner.

Where does this mythical extra refining capacity come from? Any sources?

p.s. our refined gas does not come from California.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2018, 4:15 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
It can transport any petroleum product.
You and jagaword are being extremely disingenuous. You've already said elsewhere the pipeline is going to be used to ship to foreign markets so you can be free of the discount imposed by having only the USA as your only export market for tarsands oil.

Therefore it is clear the increased shipments of dilbit aren't going to help BC at all. In fact they will hurt us economically as well as environmentally. The increased offshore shipments will reduce the amount available for our one refinery and for the Washington state refinery that provides the rest of our gas needs. And they will drive up the price of of what those local refineries pay.

You can't have it both ways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2018, 5:51 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,213
Just paid 115.6 for regular gas at Costco in AB.

Suck it, BC.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2018, 9:31 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I'm very much in favour of transit investment, and government revenue generating and spending overall, but what I don't understand is why permanent taxes have to be raised every time we want to built a one-time capital expense. Taxes went up for the Evergreen Line, it was built, and now we still have their revenue. But now we have to raise taxes permanently again for our next wave of projects? And I imagine the same after these are built? I can't say I'm like mad about it or anything, and I know all cities across North America do it, I just don't understand why they have to.
Because when they build a new line they also have to operate it? Or do you think operational costs don't increase? Do you think that after TransLink buys a bunch of new buses they don't have to hire new drivers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2018, 10:40 PM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Just paid 115.6 for regular gas at Costco in AB.

Suck it, BC.
Just paid what works out to 1.09 for regular in Ferndale. And I didn’t have to go to Alberta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2018, 11:05 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
You and jagaword are being extremely disingenuous. You've already said elsewhere the pipeline is going to be used to ship to foreign markets so you can be free of the discount imposed by having only the USA as your only export market for tarsands oil.

Therefore it is clear the increased shipments of dilbit aren't going to help BC at all. In fact they will hurt us economically as well as environmentally. The increased offshore shipments will reduce the amount available for our one refinery and for the Washington state refinery that provides the rest of our gas needs. And they will drive up the price of of what those local refineries pay.

You can't have it both ways.
No, you apparently refuse to even try to be rational. Yes we will have it 'both ways', as the pipeline capacity is going to be tripled. That will allow as much oil and refined products to go to Vancouver as they need, as well as allowing dilbit to be exported. It's quite simple, and I'm sure you are capable of understanding this, you just don't want to.

That said, the pipeline in itself won't bring down the price of your gas. That would require more refineries to be built (among other things), which is up to you guys if you want to build them locally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 12:01 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
No, you apparently refuse to even try to be rational. Yes we will have it 'both ways', as the pipeline capacity is going to be tripled. That will allow as much oil and refined products to go to Vancouver as they need, as well as allowing dilbit to be exported. It's quite simple, and I'm sure you are capable of understanding this, you just don't want to.

That said, the pipeline in itself won't bring down the price of your gas. That would require more refineries to be built (among other things), which is up to you guys if you want to build them locally.
Nope, you're still not making any sense.

If the purpose of the pipeline is to secure higher prices for Albertan oil explain how that will not drive prices higher for British Columbians. One more incentive to fight TMX.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 1:36 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Nope, you're still not making any sense.

If the purpose of the pipeline is to secure higher prices for Albertan oil explain how that will not drive prices higher for British Columbians. One more incentive to fight TMX.
I'm not going to argue that TMX will make much difference to your gas prices - it probably won't as so much of the cost at the pump is tax. But it will allow more refined product to flow from Alberta to Vancouver because there's another 600,000 barrels of space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:19 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
I'm not going to argue that TMX will make much difference to your gas prices - it probably won't as so much of the cost at the pump is tax. But it will allow more refined product to flow from Alberta to Vancouver because there's another 600,000 barrels of space.
Why would we want more refined product flowing here? We’re already a net exporter of gasoline
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:30 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Source for that? Either way it doesn't matter too much, as I agree the TMX won't make much difference to gas prices in Vancouver, but claiming it will increase them is rubbish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:32 AM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Why would we want more refined product flowing here? We’re already a net exporter of gasoline
Wrong. BC has refining capacity of ~70 Mb/day while consuming 197

https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd...wbdisable=true
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:34 AM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Just paid what works out to 1.09 for regular in Ferndale. And I didn’t have to go to Alberta
The gas prices are so high here in Metro Van because they know people will just keep paying it. They will keep cranking up the gas taxes. The thinking is that if we don't like it, move somewhere else. Otherwise, just shut up and pay.

It makes my trips south to shop that much sweeter as the price gap widens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:34 AM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Just paid what works out to 1.09 for regular in Ferndale. And I didn’t have to go to Alberta
And how long did you wait at the border crossing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:35 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Wrong
Continuing a very consistent trend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:36 AM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I'm very much in favour of transit investment, and government revenue generating and spending overall, but what I don't understand is why permanent taxes have to be raised every time we want to built a one-time capital expense. Taxes went up for the Evergreen Line, it was built, and now we still have their revenue. But now we have to raise taxes permanently again for our next wave of projects? And I imagine the same after these are built? I can't say I'm like mad about it or anything, and I know all cities across North America do it, I just don't understand why they have to.
Transit projects require long term debt, typically with 30 year plus terms. The taxes stay in place until the debt matures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:37 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
And how long did you wait at the border crossing?
Drove right up there was no line

http://www.borderlineups.com/peace-a...er-wait-times/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:39 AM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
That wasn't his point. The gas taxes are getting out of hand as seen in this breakdown of provincial taxes on clear gasoline (i.e. regular unleaded fuel)


Source: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/ta...ates-fuels.pdf

So 33 cents on every dollar expended to purchase a litre of fuel in metro Vancouver can be attributable alone to gas taxes. This table doesn't even reflect the additional 1.5 cent increase, so let's round it up to 35 cents per litre. Great! Oh, we also forgot to add the GST at 5% of the total purchase. GST applies on top of the other taxes resulting in multiple layers of taxation on taxes. Tax party! So yeah, a $1.61 litre price per fuel has at least 55 cents in taxes and people have good reason to be tired of it...
Also 10c per litre Federal excise tax
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2018, 2:41 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Wrong. BC has refining capacity of ~70 Mb/day while consuming 197

https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd...wbdisable=true
Our refining capacity together with refined products from Alberta made us a net exporter of gasoline in 2017. We exported 6,000 barrels per day to the US. Any more questions?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.