HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2021, 10:35 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
Council has now voted to pursue demolition of 100 Stanley. Could delay the project and add costs and no guarantee the province approves this. But I think this is the correct path. Every time I drive through there, I look at the empty lot on the west side and have trouble visualizing that house there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2021, 1:07 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
Thankfully there's some sanity on council to demolish this money pit, still surprising it just passed at 8-7 vote. I don't see why the province wouldn't accept this amendment to the EA, not like we have some overconcerned heritage muckety mucks provincial like he do on the municipal level. Most want economic recovery and prosperity, keeping some abandoned shithole and spending $1M+ to move said shithole is the definition of stupidity.

Here's CTV London piece on it: https://london.ctvnews.ca/put-off-by...ource=facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2021, 5:09 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 6,072
Agreed. There is zero logical reason to redo the EA in this case. So no reason to delay start of project by a year and incur extra costs. The demolition permit should be signed ASAP and bulldozer should be onsite next day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2021, 10:20 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
Thankfully there's some sanity on council to demolish this money pit, still surprising it just passed at 8-7 vote. I don't see why the province wouldn't accept this amendment to the EA, not like we have some overconcerned heritage muckety mucks provincial like he do on the municipal level. Most want economic recovery and prosperity, keeping some abandoned shithole and spending $1M+ to move said shithole is the definition of stupidity.

Here's CTV London piece on it: https://london.ctvnews.ca/put-off-by...ource=facebook
Richie? lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted May 2, 2021, 12:52 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 6,072
CN has cut down trees and shrubs on the rail embankment on either side of road now. Patterson billboards are still up. Something to watch for is when billboards are removed. Not sure when the demolition permit and contract will be issued to remove the house. Hopefully the sooner the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted May 2, 2021, 3:05 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post
Not sure when the demolition permit and contract will be issued to remove the house. Hopefully the sooner the better.
From the prior stories, that's not something that is imminently about to happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2021, 1:27 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 6,072
They finally demolished the grey building on the west side of Wharncliffe just south of corner. London Hydro has been active putting in new poles in order to relocated power lines on that SW corner for the past month. Still the old ladies house is standing thou.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 9:17 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
I drive to work along Wharncliffe and Horton, London Hydro has been busy west of Wharncliffe getting the poles moved. Hopefully council demolishes that old dump and gets going with the meat 9of the project for 2022. Area will be really transformed when they lower the grade 6-8 feet!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2021, 10:22 PM
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 776
Here we go again...

The AOC (Architectural Conservancy Ontario) is wishing to speak at the next Civic Works Committee meeting on October 13, to express their frustration regarding council's decision to demolish 100 Stanley Street, rather than relocate the house across the street.

Do you think this will change anything?

CTV News Article: https://london.ctvnews.ca/five-year-...ound-1.5614080

Last edited by CanadianTalk; Oct 7, 2021 at 12:36 AM. Reason: Added CTV Article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2021, 4:46 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
The ACO needs to give their heads a shake. They act like 100 Stanley is a sacred piece of heritage, as though John Graves Simcoe himself was shat out there by the Virgin Mary 2000 years ago. Other than being old, it has no real heritage associated with it. Any additional costs beyond demolition is a waste, and there's already been lots of time and money wasted on this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2021, 7:31 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,106
The city has already approved demolition have they not and the house is empty? If so just drive a back hoe over there and give it a wack...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2021, 9:41 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
The city has already approved demolition have they not and the house is empty? If so just drive a back hoe over there and give it a wack...
They have decided to demolish it, they haven't been approved to demolish it, because it's a heritage property. They still have that provincial crap to go through
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2021, 6:50 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
They have decided to demolish it, they haven't been approved to demolish it, because it's a heritage property. They still have that provincial crap to go through
Oh darn, I thought it was already approved. Such a waste of time and more money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2021, 2:48 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 6,072
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2021, 3:25 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
If ACO is so sure of their numbers, then move it themselves. Maybe the city even donates the house itself, and ACO assumes all costs and if they think they can sell it, go for it. But get it done ASAP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2021, 1:23 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
In the never ending saga of 100 Stanley a report is going to Civic Works Committee to finally issue a demolition permit. Thankfully there is no need for an amendment to the EA. However the fly in the ointment is that LACH and a public participation meeting at the Planning and Environment Committee are needed to consider the application and will take another 3 months. Heritage brigade will get another chance to slow things down...

Report did outline that the city is coordinating several projects as these will impact north-south traffic along Thames crossings. Victoria Bridge Replacement Ridout will start early 2022 and will be completed in the year. Wharncliffe/Horton will tentatively start in late 2022 and will be a multi-year project. Wellington Gateway and Clark’s Bridge Improvements for BRT will likely start after Wharncliffe is done. Decade of construction ahead!

Civic Works Committee Report: https://pub-london.escribemeetings.c...cumentId=86511
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2021, 7:51 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 6,072
Patterson Signs have removed one of the billboards on the south embankment of Springbank. Only two more to go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2022, 1:38 AM
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 776
Construction on this project has been deferred (yet, once again lol) to 2023, according to the project page. It was originally scheduled to start in 2021, then pushed back to 2022, and now pushed back again.

I read somewhere that the reason why they are deferring it, this time, is because they don't want this project to coincide with the Victoria Bridge replacement (which will require a full closure of Ridout St starting this spring until next year). Otherwise, you would have major disruptions to two north/south roads, in a very short distance.

Last edited by CanadianTalk; Jan 24, 2022 at 3:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2022, 1:43 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,766
Well, that sucks. I can see the point of not closing them simultaneously, but I would have preferred to see Wharncliffe done first, which would make it a better road to deal with potential Ridout diversion traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2022, 2:59 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
Unfortunately because Wharncliffe project will take 2 years to complete, while the Victoria Rideout bridge will be done in 1, it makes sense getting pushed back. Had all the other issues with Stanley St expropriation been wrapped up in a timely manner, project might have been done by now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Well, that sucks. I can see the point of not closing them simultaneously, but I would have preferred to see Wharncliffe done first, which would make it a better road to deal with potential Ridout diversion traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.