HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 3:29 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Read more closely. These are anecdotes. Brantford mayor has been very clear: their downtown successes have been based on the things that they spent their kickback money on. We spend ours on potholes already. There has not been a single word from anyone pushing a Hamilton casino about investing the kickback into city building initiatives. So far the only person who has made a comment about spending the kickback was Bob Bratina's comments about propping up the horses.

Windsor saw great success back in the days when the americans came over in droves. In the article you quoted, the mayor of Windsor named one spinoff benefit, and it's one that is simply not available to us: "Americans come here, visit the casino, that’s a spinoff." Not only that, OLG's own numbers point to a huge decline in this benefit.

The main direct benefit he celebrates is the employment. But we can (and have already started to) attract far higher quality jobs than this - as long as we keep building our momentum.

Is it really worth the risk?
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 3:32 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
http://www.newstips.org/2011/08/slot...nes-kill-jobs/

Quote:
Every new slot machine at a Chicago casino will destroy one job each year, by taking money out of the consumer economy, according to John Warren Kindt, business professor at the University of Illinois at Champaign Urbana. Four thousand slots could mean forty thousand lost jobs over a decade.
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 3:55 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by coalminecanary View Post
Read more closely. These are anecdotes. Brantford mayor has been very clear: their downtown successes have been based on the things that they spent their kickback money on. We spend ours on potholes already. There has not been a single word from anyone pushing a Hamilton casino about investing the kickback into city building initiatives. So far the only person who has made a comment about spending the kickback was Bob Bratina's comments about propping up the horses.

Windsor saw great success back in the days when the americans came over in droves. In the article you quoted, the mayor of Windsor named one spinoff benefit, and it's one that is simply not available to us: "Americans come here, visit the casino, that’s a spinoff." Not only that, OLG's own numbers point to a huge decline in this benefit.

The main direct benefit he celebrates is the employment. But we can (and have already started to) attract far higher quality jobs than this - as long as we keep building our momentum.

Is it really worth the risk?
1200 jobs with average annual salary of $49,000 is nothing to be sneezed at. That's a nearly $60 million annual payroll to their staff.

Then there is the $10 million cut from the casino to be paid annually to the city. Not to mention the property taxes the resort would add to the city coffers.
__________________
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul"
-George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:46 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
1200 jobs with average annual salary of $49,000 is nothing to be sneezed at. That's a nearly $60 million annual payroll to their staff.

Then there is the $10 million cut from the casino to be paid annually to the city. Not to mention the property taxes the resort would add to the city coffers.
What guarantee is there that those jobs will actually be people from Hamilton?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 1:27 PM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,245
Speaking of ATMs, I was listening to Y108 and the morning show woman (Shawna?) was saying she went to Flamboro Downs, and the ATMs there only give out $50s. This really surprised me.
__________________
Livin' At The Corner Of Dude And Catastrophe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 2:13 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Why would it surprise you? This is exactly the kind of behaviour to expect from casino operators, and to expect anything different from the OLG or any private operator they choose is absurd.

The OLG mandate to "increase revenue" is just a different way of saying they want to "increase the amount of money people lose" which is the number one priority of all casinos.

The OLG's other plans, including turning 5% of the non gambling population into gamblers, is akin to replacing the word "people" with the word "Ontarian". (They also want more lotteries - run privately, more kiosks, and internet gaming)
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:01 PM
durandy durandy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by coalminecanary View Post
The OLG mandate to "increase revenue" is just a different way of saying they want to "increase the amount of money people lose" which is the number one priority of all casinos.
The MLSE's mandate to "increase revenue" is just a different way of saying they want to 'increase the amount of money people lose' which is the number one priority of all sports entertainment.

Insert whatever entertainment entity you want for MLSE and what's the big problem?

I'm concerned about problem gambling, but you haven't sold me with the economic argument. Can you show me that the majority of entertainment dollars currently spent are being kept in the city? I doubt they are. These aren't people who would otherwise be going to the AGH who instead will spend their money at the casino.

I'm also not at all excited about the lame Mercanti sales pitch but I also recognize it has absolutely no impact, since no one in the city has any power to approve the casino. It smacks of desparation to me, since other players are most likely making far more effective sales pitches to the people who will actually decide the issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:08 PM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattgrande View Post
Speaking of ATMs, I was listening to Y108 and the morning show woman (Shawna?) was saying she went to Flamboro Downs, and the ATMs there only give out $50s. This really surprised me.
She was wrong. The ATM's at Flamboro only give out $20's. Some of the ATM's at Brantford casino give out $50's but that is only in the high limit table games area. Besides that most people have limits on their bank card for how much they can withdraw each day, with my primary bank I can only withdraw $400 per day and that would include any fees the ATM's charge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:21 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
You are trying to compare non-casino entertainment spending as if it's currently leaving the community, because people are choosing to go to the ACC or to see movies shot by Americans. Sure, some of our entertainment dollars leave the city. But a lot of our discretionary spending stays here.

This is closer to the reality that casino hosts experience - the local businesses get shut out:

http://youtu.be/eNmEDYImYS0

What has driven our downtown renewal over the last 10 years? Local businesses.
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:50 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
While it is sad to see a suffering restaurant in Niagara Falls, NY, that is an anecdotal account to say the least. It should also be pointed out that "documentary" was actually a thinly disguised commercial put forward by the anti-casino campaign in Ohio.

The experience in Windsor is completely the opposite, with the neighbouring dining and entertainment district thriving. The same can be said about Niagara Falls, Ontario. Maybe OLG knows how to do a casino that does not have negative impact on neighbouring businesses.
__________________
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul"
-George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:53 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
Maybe OLG knows how to do a casino that does not have negative impact on neighbouring businesses.
Then why didn't they perform their magic spell on Brantford?

Brantford's successes were based solely on casino kickbacks and jobs.

We already earmarked our kickbacks, and we are moving a gaming facility within our borders, not just building a new one, so many of these jobs are simply moved, not created.

Quote:
The casino parking lot is packed 365 days a year — even on Christmas. But its attendees don't tend to visit surrounding businesses, Prang said.

“The casino itself is the destination. We're not seeing a whole lot of spillover.”
http://www.cbc.ca/hamilton/news/stor...-downtown.html
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 5:58 PM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by coalminecanary View Post
You are trying to compare non-casino entertainment spending as if it's currently leaving the community, because people are choosing to go to the ACC or to see movies shot by Americans. Sure, some of our entertainment dollars leave the city. But a lot of our discretionary spending stays here.

This is closer to the reality that casino hosts experience - the local businesses get shut out:

http://youtu.be/eNmEDYImYS0

What has driven our downtown renewal over the last 10 years? Local businesses.
I go to the Seneca casino every couple of weeks. In fact I will be spending the long weekend there next week. I may not spend my money just outside the casino because there is nothing there, but I will be spending hundreds of dollars in the city shopping and dining. That Casino draws more people to the city than the falls does. It also employs thousands of people who contribute to the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 9:50 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
coalmine, Flamboro is closing regardless, so those jobs are eventually gone. We need a casino complex to replace and even increase those jobs, if we say NO we lose it all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 10:05 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,303
Developer floats novel Hamilton casino idea – on a boat

http://www.thespec.com/news/local/ar...idea-on-a-boat

A Hamilton man says he wants to bring a floating casino to the waterfront.

Don Maga says he’s purchased the storied Captain John’s – which has sat at the foot of Yonge St. in Toronto for years – with the intention of bringing it to the Hamilton Harbour.

Maga also says he intends to put in a bid with the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation to run a casino in the 300-foot, 85,000 square-foot vessel. However, if he’s unsuccessful on the casino front, he says he still plans to open a restaurant and banquet centre.

“First and foremost, it will be a place for people to come to, whether it’s a casino or not,” Maga said.

Maga has something of a history of coming up with big ideas for broken things.

Back in 2011 he said he was preparing to purchase the former Scott Park school, planning to create a community centre on the ground floor and rent out the upper stories. In the end the school was purchased by a Vancouver developer.

And in 2000, Maga tried to purchase and revive an old Volkswagen dealership at Cannon Street east that had sat empty for years. He dreamed of combining a fix-it-yourself auto repair shop with a new car dealership. That dream as well was never realized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 12:59 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Floating Casino + Trial Balloon = Best Hovercraft Ever
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 1:12 PM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,245
I honestly love the idea of a casino boat. It probably won't happen, but it's something unique (to this area) that might actually draw tourism dollars.

I doubt an ordinary casino (even if it's a casino complex) will draw people from out of town if it's competing with Niagara, Toronto, etc.
__________________
Livin' At The Corner Of Dude And Catastrophe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 2:01 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
More press:

Here’s to the unsubtle Mercantis (Hamilton Spectator, Andrew Dreschel, Feb 6 2013)

Gambling with our Downtown (Unindustrialism.com, Unindustrialism, Feb 5, 2013)

Dropping the "C" bomb (Hamilton Magazine, Sean Burak, Winter 2013)

And on a related note, a Feb 6, 2013 General Issues Committee Livestream (via Joey Coleman). Today's GIC agenda is here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Feb 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 3:20 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Toronto casino slammed by OLG chair’s company RioCan (Toronto Star): http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hal...ny_riocan.html

Hamilton Fact Check: Dissecting RockHammer's casino claims (CBC): http://www.cbc.ca/hamilton/news/stor...no-claims.html
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 4:12 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,303
There's no promise that Great Canadian will continue to operate a casino at Flamaboro Downs. There's rumoured they'll actually propose a downtown casino as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2013, 4:26 PM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Council chooses the location if we say yes. If council chooses Flamboro Downs, then bidders have to pitch accordingly.

Signs of casino success in Niagara?

Slot attendants offered buy-outs from Niagara Casinos: http://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/201...iagara-casinos
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.