Boy. It's so hard to sidestep the politics on this one. Considering who issued it, when, and why, it's almost impossible to separate it out from the culture war. And Tucker certainly knows the score by using words like disgusting and disgraceful to describe what is a lightly controversial (and now decades old) style shift in mostly DC building trends. It's another attempt to find enemies amongst the arts community and the Fed bureaucracy, and it sucks. Anyway. Sorry, Genral, I had to get that off my chest.
THAT SAID. I don't disagree that we get the occasional ugly building out of the GSA system as it stands. So if the EO consisted of the following guiding principles only, I'd be 100% for it.
Quote:
|
"New Federal building designs should, like America’s beloved landmark buildings, uplift and beautify public spaces, inspire the human spirit, ennoble the United States, command respect from the general public, and, as appropriate, respect the architectural heritage of a region. They should also be visibly identifiable as civic buildings and should be selected with input from the local community."
|
I can't tell you how much these guidelines match the GSA's current process (so many of the Brutalist buildings are 50/60 years old, long-completed), but these are good guidelines.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...ng-beautiful-federal-civic-architecture/