Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza
It should be comprehensible, everything costs money. The city struggles to maintain fairmount park as it is- they need to get the basics under control before they expand their sphere of responsibility to things like cosmetic upgrades. The CCD is mostly responsible for the "extras" like that in center city. They have done park upgrades, planters, pedestrian lighting etc for years all over CC. I think Avenue of the Arts was responsible for most of the enhancements you see on south broad.
|
Park Avenue has a city/resident partnership for vegetation, decorations, and maintenance. Broad Street lacks big money residents, but it's an idea for the CCD to consider. Michigan Avenue may have a similar practice.
Anecdote... I see NYC trucks cleaning trash and watering the plants in the Park Ave median weekly, and the residents of Park Ave South paid an artist to display her interesting sculptures on the median edges for the summer from 34th-40th Street, they attract a ton of attention. Broad Street could replicate these ideas, but yes, it takes money, organization, and motivation, which is lacking...
But I still think reasonable cosmetic upgrades in the heart of Philadelphia are worthwhile investments. They improve the image and experience of the city for residents and visitors.
At least Cherelle Parker seems motivated to address obvious blight issues, a start.