Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet
From my limited experience at a Target in Minneapolis, it seemed that store was over flowing with stock, atmosphere was different, grocery was better, just had more selection in general.
Obviously there's the whole issue of US vs. Canadian items for various reasons. But I don't think they lived up to the expectations of the public. Plain and simple. And since they've pulled out of Canada, that speaks volumes. How many billions will they lose on this?
Maybe Target should've come and said right form the start this will not be the same as US target. But that seems pretty risky. Either way, they've failed. Maybe we'll see them try again if they're still around in 50 years.
|
I like Target and I've been to a lot of them in the US so I'm a bit of an armchair expert when it comes their stores. Hands down the biggest difference that I could see in the Canadian stores were the empty shelves and the supply chain problems they had here. Right up until the end they were having problems with keeping certain items in stock.
But beyond that, the differences were very minor... or at least no more than you would expect for a company basically starting up in Canada. The stores looked more or less the same as their US counterparts... the design and atmosphere (particularly in the new purpose-built store at Polo Park) were hardly any different. The prices were a bit higher, but you can say the same for any chain that operates in Canada and the US. Wal-Mart is the exact same... a basket of items will cost more at our Wal-Marts than the ones in North Dakota.
You're dead right, at the end of the day the customer is always right. But in this case I wonder if the customer really knew what it even wanted from Target... did it just come down to the fact that Target generally costs a couple bucks more than Wal-Mart and that was enough to do them in?