Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan
The league has not stated that Van, Tor, and Mon will have an increased rotation. Afterall, since '95, Montreal and Toronto have hosted twice, and Regina thrice.
Vancouver has hosted more, but this next year, they are filling in as Winnipeg/Ottawa were supposed to host, but for obvious reasons, aren't ready yet.
The league has stated that a basically equal rotation is the goal. Besides, seeing as the CFL is basically a board, all other teams would never go for that since the Grey Cup is a major revenue stream. Further, the CFL wouldn't be getting the investment in stadiums from cities/provinces without the premise that a Grey Cup will be hosted regularly.
|
1994-2013
Over the past 20 seasons, each city (except Hamilton...
and Ottawa, but it didn't have a team for 12 of these years) has hosted the Grey Cup at least twice. Vancouver (4
...not including 2014); Edmonton (3); & Regina (3) are over-represented at the moment.
8 out of 20 Grey Cups during this period were played indoors.
The West Division hosted 12 out of 20 during this period.
1998-2017
If we assume the Legaue will want to showcase new stadiums/teams Winnipeg (2015), Hamilton (2016), & Ottawa (2017 - for Canada150)... then over the preceding 20 seasons, each team (except Hamilton) will host have hosted the Grey Cup at least twice. Vancouver (4) and Winnipeg (3) will be over-represented. And, again, 8 out of 20 Grey Cups during this period will be held indoors. The West Division will have hosted 11 out of 20 during this period.
Conclusion
While not perfect, and taking into account these are simply snapshots in time, seems to me that the CFL has balanced Indoor/Outdoor and East/West pretty well. Vancouver seems to host slightly more often, which skews both the indoor/outdoor balance, and the East/West balance.
(I guess if Ottawa gets it in 2017, they'll be slightly overrepresented, given that they'll only have been active 8 out of the precding 20 seasons...so they'll have hosted once every 4 years...
)