HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2041  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 9:04 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,778
This plan makes little to no sense to me.

The trip from Horseshoe Bay to Porteau is about 20 minutes, a few minutes over any crossing and at least 20 minutes back down to Gibsons is over 40 minutes, a longer journey than the sailing time. Sure you save the wait time at the terminal but you also add additional emissions of all those cars driving for another 40 minutes rather than one ferry.

Seems like a lot of financial risk for not much gained. Especially when you factor in the payoff time for the bridge, as it only serves a full time population of roughly 50,000 (granted there are a lot of seasonal visitors). If you ask me the money is better spent elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2042  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 9:09 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
Why not? Make it near the same price as the Ferry. There's no free alternative now.

It will be faster, more reliable, operate 24 hours per day and never book out. Sounds like a pretty big win if the price could be the similar to pay for construction.
Agreed and I would totally want it tolled. But it doesn't matter that there is no free alternate now. According to the policy on tolling

The only good thing is that it would provide access 24/7 versus now. Last ferry to mainland is what 9pm? But yea probably not worth it. Would be friggin sweet though
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2043  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 10:26 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
This plan makes little to no sense to me.

The trip from Horseshoe Bay to Porteau is about 20 minutes, a few minutes over any crossing and at least 20 minutes back down to Gibsons is over 40 minutes, a longer journey than the sailing time. Sure you save the wait time at the terminal but you also add additional emissions of all those cars driving for another 40 minutes rather than one ferry.

Seems like a lot of financial risk for not much gained. Especially when you factor in the payoff time for the bridge, as it only serves a full time population of roughly 50,000 (granted there are a lot of seasonal visitors). If you ask me the money is better spent elsewhere.
May I say I agree totally. The project is excessive, and the money it would take to build it could, for example, to a new Highway 99 Massey Tunnel
replacement, among countless other things.
Chosse your priority, but file this one under inactive .... please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2044  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 10:42 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,697
^ Maybe a two-lane highway then rather than a four-lane expressway-like road? Combined with something like a passenger-only ferry to connect with Vancouver and tolls with something like night discounts for trucks to manage traffic volumes. I was thinking it could be somewhat like the Confederation Bridge linking PEI.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2045  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 12:16 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by xd_1771 View Post
^ Maybe a two-lane highway then rather than a four-lane expressway-like road? Combined with something like a passenger-only ferry to connect with Vancouver and tolls with something like night discounts for trucks to manage traffic volumes. I was thinking it could be somewhat like the Confederation Bridge linking PEI.
If they went with a southern alignment, it would replace both Ferries and cut travel times down to about 20 minutes total from Gibsons to Horseshoe Bay.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2046  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 2:02 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Imagine the West Van outcry, too. They wanted their section of Hwy 1 completely encased in a tunnel, there's no way they'd allow a connection anywhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2047  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2014, 7:56 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
So I know there has been a lot of talk about more cats eyes would be nice around here but the dutch have taken a new step to roads instead. glow in the dark roads.

I am very curious how well this might work around here in some locations like SFPR and many other spots

more can be read here
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014...n-netherlands/

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2048  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2014, 5:53 PM
Genauso's Avatar
Genauso Genauso is offline
A hole being Doug
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 498
The federal government or the province will not be the ones to build any major connection to the sunshine coast.

Washington and Oregon states became American territory because profitability in eastern Canada was prioritized. BC only became a province after the Klondike goldfish began, the railway came too late, and then policies dictated industrialization stay in Ontario even though we had better access to supplies of power and steel/aluminum feedstocks (one big reason why Boeing was located in Washington state)

Lion's Gate bridge? Guinness family investment after overcoming objections by CPR and backed by federal government

Al-Can highway? USA built it during WWII for a safe land route to Alaska

BC Hydro? Necessary tool for Columbia River treaty negotiation to get more than Federal government was about to give away

It is rare to aim for growth and the future because we have a few dominant voices that are generally afraid of losing what they have. This region has always had to poor someone else first: Britain, CPR, Ontario. Even today the lumber sector which is big and was bigger had to sacrifice the Softwood lumber dispute win for Ottawa's use while we outright donated billions to the auto sector. Film and Tech provide some hope, but then residential real estate developers thwarted the whole HSR just to protect their subsidy in the PST.

Any other country in the world and the costal regions would have been opened up with a costal highway instead making do with 97 being only 300km and a couple mountain ranges away while we pretend there isn't enough land here.

Big moves here tend to arrive overdue. All we're left with is patience, until it is our turn to exploit a moment in time like the American prairies selling grain to Europe at market rates from the late 1800s until the end of the great war, or California with the last two decades of tech such IPOs. We have fresh air, fresh water, fresh food, energy, minerals, a strategic coast. Opportunity will seek those out. The time will come when a bridge to the sunshine coast is seen as only the beginning of a much larger project.

Last edited by Genauso; Apr 14, 2014 at 6:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2049  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2014, 6:55 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,416
^ Well said.

I've got a nostalgic affinity for the BC Ferry system, but that's a product of my having used it with some frequency to visit Vancouver Island, and particularly the Sunshine Coast, while I was a child and young teenager in the 1990s. My more recent trips have been on mainline routes between Nanaimo and Tsawwassen and Vancouver Island, and it's been a pleasant but expensive experience. In my mind I think I classify taking the ferry as almost something like an expensive flight on which I can bring a car. I genuinely don't think of the ferry system as part of the highway system. I have no issue with there being a fair degree of subsidy, but I also think that it's unrealistic to expect a level of service and a cost of use that is, respectively, very good and very low. It's a vexing problem in many respects. A big part of what distinguishes our province is its coast and thousands of islands, but there's really no economical way to ever provide low-cost, high quality service to more than a handful of them. I'd love it if we as a province had a sovereign wealth fund from which we could distribute its largess to cherished BC endeavours (BC Parks Service, BC Ferries, back-country recreation, museums and galleries, public events, etc.). Such a fund could never hope to do anything more than knock a few points off of the cost of such services, but it could be the difference between maintaining the status quo and cuts. Norway got it right with its sovereign wealth fund. While that now how Norway is using its money, I think such a spending priority would help convince BC to commit to saving all of our energy revenues, particularly prior to LNG getting up and running. (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/iraqi-...orld-1.2604105)
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Apr 14, 2014 at 7:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2050  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 1:05 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,221
Low Level Road (North Vancouver) transformation update from today.





The upper road terracing is very tall and steep. Hopefully it will hold.


Last minute shot of the new railway overpass.


As a bonus a photo of the Powell Street upgrade in East Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2051  
Old Posted May 5, 2014, 4:42 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by connect2source View Post
There's an especially bad one halfway between the 'hump' and the 4th / Fir exit on the south slope, it's quite severe and seems to have been installed in a very sloppy fashion. I drive over it every day and can only imagine it getting more severe over time.
Pic by me today (dropped the car off at the shop and walked back over the bridge):



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2052  
Old Posted May 5, 2014, 5:31 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,416
Drove over the Granville St. Bridge for the first time in a while and you can sure feel the expansion-joint bumps. I was surprised it was as noticeable as it was. Could they not just send a crew out to grind it down?
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2053  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 1:13 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genauso View Post
but then residential real estate developers thwarted the whole HSR just to protect their subsidy in the PST.
This is BS. The HST was good for the development industry. It was bad for the real estate marketing industry. It seemed like things were getting more expensive because the taxes were more visible to the buyer, but the worst thing was the uncertainty around the tax. Whether it would stay, transitional credit, etc. Not to mention it wasn't exactly introduced at the best time in the market. I'm sure developers would love to have it back though. I know the film industry would (and many many others).
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2054  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 3:24 AM
connect2source's Avatar
connect2source connect2source is offline
life in the present
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Pic by me today (dropped the car off at the shop and walked back over the bridge):



That's the one! Wow, it look terrible close up, totally uneven, don't understand the reasoning, I wonder if it will be resolved?
__________________
source | energy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2055  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 4:03 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,221
At least southbound many of the joints used to be much sharper, but I remember someone mentioning there having been some work crew and they obviously did fix some of them. Few still remain fairly sharp and they should really fix them as well to save our tires.

In comparison the new joints on Burrard Bridge are smooth as silk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2056  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 3:31 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 919
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrenegade View Post
This is BS. The HST was good for the development industry. It was bad for the real estate marketing industry. It seemed like things were getting more expensive because the taxes were more visible to the buyer, but the worst thing was the uncertainty around the tax. Whether it would stay, transitional credit, etc. Not to mention it wasn't exactly introduced at the best time in the market. I'm sure developers would love to have it back though. I know the film industry would (and many many others).
ugh is this bad dream of the PST over yet? It would be nice if the libs made the PST a VAT style tax and got rid of this variable rate on certain things.

I have to say last night coming to the new cornwall/burrard intersection, the city obviously loved the way hornby is working with their double light setup at streets with turns that they thought they should scale it up here. The old setup was far more fluid than this new monstrosity.

/rant
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2057  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 8:05 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
At least southbound many of the joints used to be much sharper, but I remember someone mentioning there having been some work crew and they obviously did fix some of them. Few still remain fairly sharp and they should really fix them as well to save our tires.

In comparison the new joints on Burrard Bridge are smooth as silk.
I think the joints with teh teeth are the old joints.
The new ones have the rubber gaskets and a sizable gap.
When walking across Granville Bridge, the new joints with the gasket a gap made the most noise - with a klunk each time a car went over.

Of the ones with the teeth - the one I photographed (and mentioned by connect2source) was the worst. All the others I saw (walking on the west sidewalk) were level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2058  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 8:20 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I think the joints with teh teeth are the old joints.
The new ones have the rubber gaskets and a sizable gap.
When walking across Granville Bridge, the new joints with the gasket a gap made the most noise - with a klunk each time a car went over.

Of the ones with the teeth - the one I photographed (and mentioned by connect2source) was the worst. All the others I saw (walking on the west sidewalk) were level.
That thing existing in an Aug 2012 Google Maps image so it does look to be an old joint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2059  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 8:47 PM
connect2source's Avatar
connect2source connect2source is offline
life in the present
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by spm2013 View Post
That thing existing in an Aug 2012 Google Maps image so it does look to be an old joint.
Then it must have somehow shifted, I've driven over that spot daily since 1998 and it was never like that until the expansion joint work was done on the bridge. It's does, however, appear old in the pick by officedweller.
__________________
source | energy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2060  
Old Posted May 6, 2014, 8:51 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,834
I've driven over the bridge for years and only noticed that joint (while driving) within the past year too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.