HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2041  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 12:01 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
Ahh, your right, i read a post wrong and got confused, hehe, i thought something seemed really out of place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2042  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 2:09 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
are you telling me one can buy a unit in the Shangri-la for 405 523 dollars?
Are you pro-rating 600 sq ft based on the above figure?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2043  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 3:38 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjauk View Post
Look, Vancouver is not the crap-hole that many make it out to be, but it's also not London, New York, or Paris. I think both the boosters ("greatest place in the world") and the detractors ought to get their heads out of their rear-ends and step back and make a realistic comparison of Vancouver with other cities.

In a recent issue of foreign policy magazine, Vancouver does not even make a list of the world's 60 Global Cities Index. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...id=4509&page=1

I'm someone who loves this city, but has travelled and lived in enough places around the world to understand the city's advantages and disadvantages compared to other cities.
Montreal didn't make it either, so Toronto is the real stuff...

Vancouver is not on par with the real world cities in terms of economy anyways. But in this corner of the universe, this city is the real stuff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2044  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 5:22 AM
NewfBC NewfBC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,293
The kitchen counter tops are fugly!

Ron.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2045  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 5:26 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,136
i am sure those buyers who plan to live in them wwill rip em out and redo to their own tastes
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2046  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 10:27 AM
duener duener is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: YVR>LHR>YUL
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
are you telling me one can buy a unit in the Shangri-la for 405 523 dollars?
Maybe not right at the moment, but give it a year and they may be even cheaper... check out vancouvercondo.info blog for info on the real estate scene. Prices peaked in May, and all price gains for the year have been wiped out. Some analysts think 70% of buyers in the Vancouver market have been speculators (mostly locals rather than foreigners) - people snapping up presale condos, putting 5% down with low interest mortgages.

I'm a Vancouverite living in London, and the crazy thing is that Vancouver prices started approaching London prices (but without the economy/well paid salaries). So it's not surprising that with record amounts of stock, and speculators dropping out Vancouver prices are now falling faster than American cities did.

You can rent a one-bedroom in a nice part of central London for $2200 / month (see gumtree.co.uk)... I pay only $1000 / mo. in a central house share. So investors in Vancouver who are trying to rent these places for $2000+ / mo. are going find few renters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2047  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 11:52 AM
eduardo88 eduardo88 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Berlin + Madrid
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by duener View Post
I'm a Vancouverite living in London, and the crazy thing is that Vancouver prices started approaching London prices (but without the economy/well paid salaries). So it's not surprising that with record amounts of stock, and speculators dropping out Vancouver prices are now falling faster than American cities did.

You can rent a one-bedroom in a nice part of central London for $2200 / month (see gumtree.co.uk)... I pay only $1000 / mo. in a central house share. So investors in Vancouver who are trying to rent these places for $2000+ / mo. are going find few renters.
nice to see another vancouverite living in london

you only pay $1000 a month? where are you living/with how many people? i have a two bed right now in The City (between aldgate and tower hill), and my flatmate and i pay around $2400 each a month (no bills), which is quite a bit, although the building is brand new with very high quality fittings, though a bit small (obviously, its london).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2048  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 4:49 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by duener View Post
I'm a Vancouverite living in London, and the crazy thing is that Vancouver prices started approaching London prices (but without the economy/well paid salaries). So it's not surprising that with record amounts of stock, and speculators dropping out Vancouver prices are now falling faster than American cities did.
Are you kidding??? Vancouver's housing price declines are not even close to matching the price declines in the states.

Quote:

REAL ESTATE
B.C. HOUSING HEADS DOWNHILL
Boom times are over for the province following explosive growth in demand, prices

DAVID EBNER AND LORI MCLEOD

October 30, 2008

VANCOUVER and TORONTO -- Canada's most expensive housing market is hitting a significant slump, with home sales numbers falling and prices declining, the British Columbia Real Estate Association said yesterday.

"The bull market in housing is over in British Columbia, and it's been over for several months," said Cameron Muir, the group's chief economist.

The association, in a forecast published yesterday, said prices could average $453,000 in B.C. this year. But for 2009, prices are predicted to slump 9 per cent to an average of $413,000 - with much of the decline taking place before the end of this year.

The market peaked in the spring, the forecast said. Over the summer, cracks began to show. Consumer confidence wavered. People would go to open houses but wouldn't buy. Sales fell almost 50 per cent in July, compared with a year earlier, and fell more than 50 per cent in August. Prices weakened. And then the credit crisis hit - and B.C. and Vancouver prices kept falling.

The Globe and Mail

Other forecasts are more dire. Last week, Credit 1 Credit Union estimated average B.C. housing prices at $385,000 in 2009 and in 2010 at $366,000 - down about 20 per cent from this year's peak.

In 2002 and 2003, when the B.C. boom started to take off, the average price of a home in B.C. was roughly $250,000.

The B.C. market, like others in North America, was powered by low mortgage interest rates. However, the region also had numerous other factors at work, including explosive demand following an economic slump from the mid-1990s through the early 2000s, the desirability of the province as a place to reside, and the influx of foreign money and speculators.

The slump could make the city and the province more affordable for other Canadians who have considered moving to B.C., and for businesses that see an advantage in locating in the region. Civic business leaders for years have said a major challenge in attracting new businesses is the lack of affordable housing.

The current situation also quells the mantra that accompanies all booms - "This time it's different" - said Paul Boenisch, a real estate agent at Prudential Sussex Realty in North Vancouver.

"I heard people say, 'There's no more land left to build. We're a global destination now in the world.' We have to keep in mind that five years ago, before home prices doubled, we were still the same city," Mr. Boenisch said.

Outside Vancouver, B.C.'s market was beyond hot as oil money rolled in from Alberta, with energy executives and engineers buying up lakefront property in the Okanagan in the province's interior. Prices in such areas could see large declines.

In the resort of Whistler north of Vancouver, the market has been mixed for several years since the boom sparked by the low Canadian dollar petered out around 2002.

Today, particularly since the credit crisis erupted, the market in Whistler is subdued, said Ron Mitchell, an agent and owner of Sutton West Coast Realty Whistler.

"The last three weeks have been quiet - there's no question," said Mr. Mitchell, who added that the winter is likely going to be slow because residents in and around Vancouver used to use home equity loans on their principle residences to secure resort property.

With Vancouver prices down, this option is gone.

The soaring supply of homes, accompanied by weak demand, is driving down the prices.

In Vancouver, it was similar to the frothiest moments in Toronto's real estate boom this decade, when bidding wars would see homes sold for tens of thousands of dollars more than the asking price.

No longer: The B.C. Real Estate Association predicted sales will be down about 30 per cent this year in Vancouver and around B.C.

Mr. Boenisch's experience is even more severe, saying sales are already down as much as 50 per cent.

"When you have 80 per cent more inventory with half the amount of buyers, this is a dramatically different market," Mr. Boenisch said.

Last week, the Canadian Real Estate Association said that housing prices in September fell 6.2 per cent from a year earlier in 25 major markets across the country, though analysts noted the size of the decline could largely be blamed on B.C. rather than a nationwide meltdown.

Due to recent experience, the B.C. housing market has been considered something that only goes up, never down. However, there have been two long slumps in the past several decades.

After a steep rise in the late 1970s, prices fell from 1981 to 1986. From there they took off again, peaking in 1995, when they fell through 1999 and were stuck in neutral for three more years, according to research from the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia.
Compare BC prices to that of the us.

Quote:
Housing: It'll get worse
Hard hit cities like Sacramento, Phoenix and Las Vegas are set for more steep losses. Some real estate experts are bracing for price drops of as much as 50%.


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With home prices plunging by more than 30% in some markets, bargain-hunters are ready to pounce.

But it may pay for buyers to wait. Many housing experts say that the worst-hit metro areas have even farther to fall, and could see total drops of as much as 50%.

"The housing boom was unprecedented in U.S. history," said Michael Youngblood, a portfolio analyst with FBR Investment Management, "and the correction will be as well."

Many erstwhile bubble cities have sustained particularly brutal hits. The median-price of a home in Sacramento, Calif. was down 35% during the three months ended May 31 compared to the same period last year, according to the real estate web site Trulia.com. In Riverside, Calif. prices fell 29%, while San Diego prices dropped 26%.

Smaller cities in California's Central Valley, such as Stockton (-39%), Modesto (-37%) and Bakersfield (-29%), also recorded steep declines.

Outside California, hard-hit markets include Phoenix (-18.8%), Las Vegas (-22%), West Palm Beach, Fla. (-32%) and Cape Coral, Fla. (-35%).

Youngblood expects that these markets will likely endure total price drops of 50% or more.
The smart money

Indeed, prices are falling faster and further than in any other post-war housing bust. During the bust in Austin, Tex., which started in 1986 and is one of the worst on record, prices fell 25%, according to Local Market Monitor, a financial data provider. And that cycle took four years to bottom out.

In other major downturns, prices in Los Angeles fell by 21% during a six-year period in the 1990s, and Honolulu home prices saw a decline of 16% in the five years starting in 1994.

Youngblood's forecast "is quite plausible," said Nicholas Perna, of the economic consulting firm Perna Associates. He finds it especially significant that the smart money, investors in the S&P Case/Shiller Home Price Index, are still buying futures as if they expect prices to continue to plummet.

The index, which tracks the sale price of specific homes as they are sold and resold over the years, is considered to be one of the most accurate home price indicators.

"The people who are putting their money where their mouths are," said Perna, "are betting on more losses."

Specifically, Case/Shiller investors are betting that Las Vegas prices will fall an additional 22% by November 2009. Los Angeles futures predict a further loss of 24.2% through November 2009, while investors expect to see Miami down another 21.6% by then.

These markets may have a hard time recovering because, according to Perna, people are afraid to buy right now, because they're concerned about over-paying. That helps explain why price depreciation seems to be accelerating.

"The most severe declines are happening right now," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com.
Prices vs. wages

This correction was inevitable, in Youngblood's opinion; home price gains had simply out-paced income by far too much to be sustained.

Historically, home prices have averaged about four times wages. Whenever homes got significantly more expensive, people could not afford to buy and home prices fell back.

But local price-to-income ratios are still out of whack even after steep price declines, which means prices have further to fall. In Los Angeles, where the ratio peaked at 22.7, according to Youngblood, it's still in the high teens. Home prices would have to come down another 40% or so to get that ratio back into the single digits.

And it's not just the housing fundamentals that lead Youngblood to expect more drops; he also cites the local economic conditions.

"Bubble cities are now seeing fleeing employment conditions," he said. In Miami, the unemployment rate rose 34.3% between April 2007 and April 2008, according to Youngblood. And the job picture in California cities, where many jobs were housing related, has been even more disastrous.

Housing was a key economic engine for towns like Riverside, Stockton and Modesto during the boom, according to Zandi. Builders, real estate salespeople, mortgage brokers and lenders, and even retailers, like Home Depot (HD, Fortune 500) and Lowe's (LOW, Fortune 500), depended on growth in the sector.

"In all those deteriorating housing markets, it's a double hit," he said.

Ten of the 11 cities with the highest unemployment rates in the nation are now in central California, with El Centro, at 18.4% in April, leading the way. Other double-digit disaster areas were in Merced (12.3%), Yuba City (11.8%), Modesto (10.7%), Visalia (10.3%), Hanford (10.2%) and Fresno (10%).

Many of these cities are also among the leaders in foreclosure rates. As more foreclosed properties hit the market, prices are further depressed.

"[The price drops] reflect a wave of distressed sales of [bank-owned] properties and discouraged sellers," said Zandi
The brighter side

Not all analysts are pessimistic. Richard DeKaser, chief economist for National City Corp (NCC, Fortune 500) points out that, thanks to the price declines, the national market is the most affordable it's been in years.

With the national median price of a single family home at $204,229, mortgage rates around 6% and the average household earning nearly $50,000, the average home buyer spent about 23.2% of their income on housing during the first quarter of 2008. That's down from 2006, when homeowners spent an average of 29% of their income on housing.

Nariman Behravesh, an economist with Global Insight, says that while he expects home prices to stagnate for the next five years, Youngblood's 50% price decline forecast is "a little extreme."

But that target is realistic, Behravesh says, after taking inflation into account. In markets where prices have fallen 35% or more, and remain depressed through five years of 4% inflation, home prices in real dollars will absorb an additional 20%-plus hit. That would push price declines to over 50%.

Of course, there are plenty of wild cards that could affect home price trends, such as the election, Congressional legislation, unemployment, gas prices, and interest rates.

"This whole market is fraught with all sorts of implications," said Perna, "and it ain't over until it's over." To top of page
Vancouver is experiencing a market correction with the added drag of the US housing bust and worldwide financial crisis making things worse. There is no bubble bursting here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2049  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 6:38 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Yeah, Vancouver and Canada as a whole are completely stable compared to the USA Market. Most of them are completely crashing, except for NYC.

Keep in mind the average price of a house in the USA is still around $200,000 and in Phoenix, Las Vegas, and etc. you can still build a HUGE 4 bedroom house with triple car garage, heated pool, on an acre of land for under $230,000, you can probably buy them now for $180,000 - $160,000. Heck, in places like Michigan whole neighborhoods have been selling for $10,000 a home at the foreclosure hearings. I haven't heard of anybody foreclosing in Canada.

I do believe this is a market correction, it was hyper inflated. Calgary is seeing the exact same thing, though mainly with multi-family homes downtown (although for slightly different reasons, they built too many condos downtown not realizing nobody actually wanted to live in downtown Calgary, and now the investors can't sell or rent them), single family homes have only gone down $3,000 average from last year. I think it will be the exact opposite in Vancouver, with Downtown maintaining its value, and the suburbs decreasing. Vancouver has a brighter future in the immediate short term than other Canadian cities, if nothing else, because of the 2010 Olympics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2050  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 6:44 PM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
Heck, in places like Michigan whole neighborhoods have been selling for $10,000 a home at the foreclosure hearings.
Yeah, but that's in Michigan


I went to see this building in person on Sunday and boy, it's huge. I took a wrong turn coming out of Waterfront Station and ended up on the seawall. Fortunatly, the building wasn't that hard to find from... well... everywhere
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2051  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 7:27 PM
subdude's Avatar
subdude subdude is offline
blog this
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Officedweller is correct.

Also not sure if it's been posted, Urban Fare opens on the 15th.
Right on, I finally have an alternative to Capers and soon the new Safeway will be open too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2052  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 10:16 PM
duener duener is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: YVR>LHR>YUL
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Are you kidding??? Vancouver's housing price declines are not even close to matching the price declines in the states.
No joke here eh! Anyone reading this thread, thinking "man, I'd like to live in Shangri-la"... just give it some time. I used to believe all the hype people would say about Vancouver... the Olympics are coming, rich foreigners are buying everything, we're running out of land, etc. But anyone interested in the market that built all these condo towers discussed here will find plenty of info on some of the real estate blogs. I only started to get into it lately, and wow it's fascinating to watch this market turn. It's only bad news for condo flippers. For average people looking to buy a home, falling prices are good news.

Hopefully the fall in prices might also turn the developers towards building office towers again.

Anyway, I'm no expert here but at the beginning of the year the "analysts" were predicting Vancouver prices would keep going up. The market peaked in May and now five months later is down 9.8%
http://vancouvercondo.info/2008/11/v...from-peak.html

Compare that with declines from peak in the US. Remember, markets there peaked some 2 years ago. Plug Vancouver's 9.8% drop at 5 months into the following graph:
http://seattlebubble.com/blog/wp-con...eak_200805.png

It looks like it's declining faster than US cities did, not surprising considering it was one of the "bubbliest" cities in the world. Hopefully now we'll get office towers and quality architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2053  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 10:23 PM
duener duener is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: YVR>LHR>YUL
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by eduardo88 View Post
nice to see another vancouverite living in london

you only pay $1000 a month? where are you living/with how many people? i have a two bed right now in The City (between aldgate and tower hill), and my flatmate and i pay around $2400 each a month (no bills), which is quite a bit, although the building is brand new with very high quality fittings, though a bit small (obviously, its london).
I'm in a house with two others, but granted it's old and in Hammersmith. Some friends of mine had a one bedroom, quite small, but in Notting Hill for £1100 /mo. Sounds like you're in quite a high end place. On a funny note I've seen Aussies, and Brazilians sleeping in bunk beds, four to a room - paying £70 / mo. each. Though I recall meeting Mexican students in Vancouver squishing 5 to room in the West End.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2054  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 10:25 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
I'm looking at buying my first place sometime next year or the year after, man would it be nice if i was able to time it just right. Buying a place in the Shangri-La for a decent price and having that as your first place, wow, now there is a dream, haha (i am not holding my breathe).

And my mistake was a read this post -
Quote:
There's a listing on the MLS now. Only one so far. It's a 677sq.ft. place asking $599k for the 23rd floor.
as 677sq.ft. at $599 a sq.ft. hehe, if it sounds too good to be true, read it again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2055  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 11:44 PM
johnjimbc johnjimbc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 766
A more apt US comparison

As some of you know, I moved here from Washington, DC, last year. Even before my move, it stuck me that aside from obvious differences Vancouver is much more comparable to DC particularly as far as housing goes.

The actual cities are similar in core population (about 750K in downtown itself) thought the DC metro area has more population than Vancouver (approximately 4 million compared to Vancouver's approximately 2.5 million).

Prices are similar, though Vancouver has a strange logarithmic curve in which larger penthouses here are higher-priced that comparable penthouse condos in DC. I tell friends in DC that condo pricing in Vancouver is like DC except it has some Manhattan peaks on the high end. If someone in DC is going to pay more than $2 Million for a condo, they'll just buy a house instead. There are a lot of large brownstone and Victorian style row-homes throughout the downtown neighborhoods which give them the room, their own bit of history (i.e. heritage). Also, since DC has very strict ceiling height restrictions throughout the city, you don't have a $4 million dollar view. Anyone on the low rise hills that sweep out into the neighborhoods from the federal center might get a glimpse of the Washington monument or capital dome so there isn't a lot to gain and folks don't pay it.

Not to say DC is inexpensive, it is anything but. But in the middle range of condo pricing, you could almost swap a listing in DC for one in Vancouver and be in the same basic ball-park of finishes, amenities, price, size, and location. Likewise, single-family home prices are surprisingly comparable as well for equivalently desirable neighborhoods.

The reason I bring all of this detail up is because DC, while impacted by the US housing shut-down, has actually fared very well overall. Prices had climbed quite substantially from about 1998 to 2005. During that time (and continuing since then), the city and surrounding burbs saw an incredible amount of positive growth, with solid development and fiscal infrastructure improvements (schools, rec centers, shopping, etc) throughout the region. When the slowdown hit the US markets starting in late 2005, prices in DC leveled off sharply and even slipped a bit in some neighborhoods. And while the investment ratios in the city were never as astronomical as those in Miami, Las Vegas, Phoenix and other US markets, some investors were caught off guard the first year of the slowdown (those who had purchased pre-sale condos completed just as the slowdown hit).

However, since that time and even into the current quarter, prices in DC have held fairly steady. Single-family home prices even continued to rise until this year, although at a slower pace. And this year, they simply leveled out in DC with a modest retreat in Maryland.

If you are so inclined, there are some great charts for DC and for the nearby Maryland suburbs at www.gcaar.com. Just click on Home Sale statistics for the data. The information is well-presented and easy to follow. Yes, you are looking at average data, which can always be a bit misleading. But it still drives home the point that the "bottom" did NOT fall-out in DC. Instead, things just leveled out and the amount of overall activity slowed from a frantic pace to something a bit more "normal."

From all that I know, it is just not proper to compare Vancouver to Las Vegas. The investment ratios in Vancouver just don't come close to the totally unsustainable levels experienced in some US cities. And though Vancouver has seen quite a construction boom, it pales in comparison to the amount of construction seen in some US markets. I suspect Vancouver is much more on par with DC, a city which has a fairly solid core population and workforce, but which is also a magnet city attracting some professionals who come, live and work and may end up making it a long-term home but who may also end up moving elsewhere with a change of employment, or change of political scene. I hasten to add, however, that DC has a much greater diversity of workforce than people ever seem to expect - too much 24-hour political reporting leads people to think everyone is a lobbyist or government employee . . . they aren't.

At any rate, for what it is worth, I suspect Vancouver is experiencing a slow-down that may result in some retreat from the recent highs. But I don't see anything that convinces me some horrid collapse awaits the city. I expect activity will slow and prices may level out for a few years until the economy works through the recessionary period, which is what DC has experienced in the US.

Another good comparison city might be Boston, Mass, though I don't know the details of that market to the degree I know Washington, DC.

Last edited by johnjimbc; Nov 11, 2008 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2056  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 11:56 PM
johnjimbc johnjimbc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 766
What is funny is I posted my last comments before looking at the chart link from a few comments back.

I really have to question the DC numbers shown on that chart. Unless they are using some bizarre "regional" value for Washington, DC (equivalent of including Prince George in Vancouver's numbers, for example) the 20% drop they show simply isn't valid. I have seen some "analysis" which does just that for US markets.

But in the urban core and even metro area of DC, the market has been and remains rather resilient. Better for buyers, yes, but for anyone hoping to go back and find 1999 pricing. Not gonna happen. I sold a condo in DC in 2006, after the market had peaked. The "sister" unit of our neighbors sold just last month, essentially the same price (theirs actually sold marginally higher but within 2%). I've seen countless neighborhood charts, various building comparable sales, and knew other buyers and sellers experiences in the past 3 years. That 20% drop figure is pure fiction or an amazing stretch using some range of data (or range of region) to obtain the desired chart.

Here is the link to the market data I referenced above:

http://www.gcaar.com/statistics/default.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2057  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2008, 7:10 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 13,845
For anyone buying, I think the market in Vancouver will bottom out in 2009. So far, most of the time my predictions have been right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2058  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2008, 7:25 PM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
For anyone buying, I think the market in Vancouver will bottom out in 2009. So far, most of the time my predictions have been right.
When do you see the overall real estate price drop?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2059  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2008, 2:43 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,136
if you look now you can find some good prices

i know i saw a condo in the west end dropped from $315,000 to $285,000 - thats a $30,000 price drop!
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2060  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2008, 7:27 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Back in 1994 when I bought my condo (one year old never lived in), the Hong Kong investor I bounght it from lost $54,000 on it (roughly 20% of the price he had paid).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.