Quote:
Originally Posted by camkazaam
Why not close the industrial canal? Hasn't it been an economic non-starter, besides being an ecological disaster?
|
The Industrial Canal (or at least half of it) is part of the Intracoastal Waterway, so you can't just close it without identifying an alternate route.
Also, the Industrial Canal is not an ecological disaster - you're thinking of MR-GO, due to the erosion it caused. It allowed salty seawater from the Gulf to penetrate deep into the wetlands, where the increased salt levels killed the trees and grasses that held the soil in place.
Really, the MR-GO was a stupid idea in the first place, pitched by overzealous, politically-connected dredging companies back in the 50s. The Mississippi already provides a wide channel connecting the Gulf to the city, and the river mouth has been easily navigable since 1877. It does require skilled pilots, but that would be the case regardless.
The Canal area has failed to attract investment, but this is because of counterproductive, opposing decisions made by the Army Corps, the city, the State, and the Port. If there was some agreement brokered, and they created a master plan, then industrial uses could start to transition to the Canal area, and the riverfront opened up for development of parkland, residential, and other uses. Really, the biggest missing piece right now is enlarging the lock so that container ships can enter the Industrial Canal. The Army Corps has stalled on this for years, and community opposition hasn't helped. IIRC the main issue was where the dredged material would be dumped, since the soil near the lock is contaminated.
Current plans are to build the new lock to Panamax sizes (the biggest ship that could pass through the Panama Canal could also pass through the Industrial Canal lock) but now Panama is building new, bigger locks, so the Army Corps' new lock will be obsolete the day it opens.