Quote:
Originally Posted by KVNBKLYN
You're comparing apples and oranges. The PATH station numbers are for riders of PATH trains only. The GCT numbers you quote are for people who "pass through" GCT, meaning tourists wandering through to take a photo, people who work nearby getting lunch, plus people who actually ride the trains there. If you want to compare apples to apples, you could include all those who passed through the old WTC mall (or who will pass through the new one) with the PATH station riders to a get a better idea of the relative importance of the two stations.
And Cuozzo's article was based on a flawed apples to oranges comparison. It's bad journalism as usual.
|
You can compare it how you want, it would still be the same. The fact is, Grand Central and Penn Station, even the Port Authority serves more than the PATH station does. Grand Central is fine, marvelous even. But I'll be damned if they can't get a rebuilt Penn Station or Port Authority Bus terminal for New York. (We can't even get the memorial complete).
And your argument changes nothing, even if I
were to agree with you. The fact is, the station is an extremely, overpriced luxury that the PA doesn't have. To add insult, they wanted to attribute redevelopment at the WTC site to the recent toll hikes. A little like spending all of your money on unneccessary luxury items, then complaining becaues you can't pay your bills. Further, complaining that someone mentions it is a little like complaing when someone calls an apple "red".
I used to use that station daily, and it was just fine then. The excess of Calatrava's design is just that. We all
know that the station is an unneccessarily expensive vanity project. We've accepted it. We still like it. But that doesn't mean we can't call it what it is.