Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalNinja
My girlfriend is Chinese, when she came here she was surprised that grocery stores take up so much valuable real estate, a store in China for produce can be 2-3 floors high maximizing available land. But this doesn't happen here. It is honestly part of NA/Canada though. This urban sprawl doesn't happen in the rest of the world where they have a larger population and less land, we have to much land that it becomes cheap to buy the land, so people just build low rise low density buildings. Problem with this is that it is not cheap in the long run, roads and infrastructure become high costs and a burden on the rest of the city. High rise have high startup costs but no where near the long term infrastructure costs.
|
The problem is that, for the most part, real estate here isn't valuable. And your are right: large tracts of land are available for little money and current MPS and zoning regulations are of little use to get anything that is remotely coherent between parcels. In addition, developers are often only required to pay initial service infrastructure costs, while the major costs - maintenance and replacement are passed on to the municipality. Low densities make this an expensive trend where the most severe financial implications have yet to be felt.
But today Sprawl does happen everywhere. Not so much in China as the gov't is in control of all land, but even there you are starting to see issues with speculative development. In India and Vietnam, sprawl is encouraged through the creation of so-called "special economic zones" that allow foreign investors to do as they please.
Even in traditionally compact and heavily controlled regions like Holland, with a long history of centralized or national planning strategies, they are dealing with issues of sprawl as demand for box retail and individual housing ownership increases.
I don't know what the solution is, but certainly efficient public transit systems, incentives for urban infill and high intensity use of the land, perhaps taxing inefficient use of land, and, maybe most of all, getting away from this manufactured ideal of single family home ownership.