Well I have to give it up to my neighbors, we fought a good fight. It's unfortunate the world works the way it does, but sadly, I was not surprised by this decision.
Lower Paxton backs Wal-Mart plan
Opponents level attacks against national retailer
Wednesday, August 04, 2004
BY KELLY BOTHUM
Of The Patriot-News
The Lower Paxton Twp. municipal building was a tough place for Wal-Mart fans last night.
And it wasn't too comfy for the board of supervisors either.
In a meeting offering more drama than the summer offerings on prime-time television, the supervisors reluctantly voted to approve a plan to build a 223,806-square-foot Wal-Mart Supercenter on the current site of the Holy Name of Jesus Roman Catholic Church and School.
The vote capped nearly three hours of attacks against Wal-Mart from a standing-room-only crowd of more than 100 residents.
All but a handful opposed the plans for a 24-hour store featuring a grocery section, a drive-through pharmacy, a garden center and 20,000 square feet of unspecified retail space.
Many in the crowd raised concerns about increasing gridlock in an area already choked with traffic.
Others focused their criticism on the Arkansas retailer's corporate reputation for stiff competition and low wages.
"They're going to suck the economic life out of the community," said Eric Epstein, a local activist who is running for the state Senate. He recently sued to revoke Wal-Mart's corporate charter in Pennsylvania.
Although approval of the plan last night was a big win for Wal-Mart, other challenges remain. Holy Name is facing a fight in its effort to relocate to West Hanover Twp. The church wants to build a 30,000-square-foot replacement for the present church and a 66,000-square-foot school on land owned by the Diocese of Harrisburg next to Resurrection Cemetery.
Several times during the meeting, supervisors said they didn't like the plan because of its impact on Lower Paxton, but they argued that they had little choice but to approve it because the plan met the township's ordinances. That was the only factor that state code allowed them to consider, they said.
Lawyer Steven Snyder, representing Lower Paxton Residents for Responsible Growth, a group opposed to the Wal-Mart, said he believed the supervisors had the authority to vote against the plan because of its negative impact on the township.
"It's very disappointing. It's bad for the township. It's bad for the residents," Snyder said.
Elected officials weren't immune from the criticism during the meeting. Several people accused the board of siding with Wal-Mart and its development plan over the wishes of residents.
"Your will should be the will of the people," resident Jack Garner told the board, reminding them of past supervisors who were voted out of office.
The supervisors wavered right up to their 4-1 vote in Wal-Mart's favor.
That decision, with Supervisor William Hornung casting the lone dissenting vote, came after a motion to reject the plan failed to secure a majority of votes.
"I'm wrestling with whether to vote yes or to vote no. And I haven't decided yet," Supervisor Gary Crissman told the audience just before his vote. He initially voted to reject the plan but voted for its approval after the first motion failed.
Chairman William B. Hawk admitted his first visit to Wal-Mart came only four weeks ago, and he couldn't wait to get out of the store. Despite that, he said, he couldn't consider his own feelings in deciding on the plan.
"This is probably one of the hardest things I've ever gone through," Hawk said, adding that he couldn't think of another project that caused more controversy in the township.
While the decision is a loss for the citizens group, Snyder said, it will work to influence off-site traffic and road improvements through the state Department of Transportation, which will issue the highway occupancy permit for the project.