HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2016, 10:50 PM
LilZebra LilZebra is offline
Orig. frm Alpha Pectaurus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Assiniboia, Man.
Posts: 2,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJG View Post
The exterior of Winnipeg Square (including the base of the current tower) is so ugly. I hope that's part of the recladding.
Well, I guess you must also have a hate on for the St. Charles Hotel, Casa Loma bldg. (Portage & Sherbrook), and 87 Smith (my former apt.).

All eyesores to me.

They're darker brown than the gold-coloured 360 Main.
__________________
Buh-bye
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2016, 11:04 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,069
or the watkins bullding at higgins and annabela
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 12:33 AM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
I am anxious to see the renderings. P&M may be an amazing destination.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 1:42 AM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
At the press conference, officials will "announce the details of its plans for a complete renewal of the existing curtain wall and environmental barrier at 360 Main and.....
The cost was mentioned earlier +165M.. This little tidbit from the media was interesting in itself...Barriers at P& M, We'll know Thursday..

http://www.winnipegsun.com/2016/04/0...unced-thursday
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 1:49 AM
LilZebra LilZebra is offline
Orig. frm Alpha Pectaurus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Assiniboia, Man.
Posts: 2,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
or the watkins bullding at higgins and annabela
Yes, that one too.
__________________
Buh-bye
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 3:29 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I wonder what the chances are that this project could end up being Winnipeg's new tallest? Think about it, 55 Nassau is a relatively old tower that clocks in at 38 storeys, 358 feet. Extended to 40 storeys it would be what, 377 feet?

If you bumped the average floor height by a little over a foot and a half a floor, that would give you 440 feet, or 20 feet taller than 201 Portage. If there is any kind of penthouse with a tall ceiling, or office podium-type arrangement with a few floors of higher ceilings at Winnipeg Square II, that would mean the average residential floor would only have to be about a foot higher than in 55 Nassau to get to that new tallest height. Maybe not probable, but it definitely seems possible... we shall see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 5:51 AM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,139
Possible Height

Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I wonder what the chances are that this project could end up being Winnipeg's new tallest? Think about it, 55 Nassau is a relatively old tower that clocks in at 38 storeys, 358 feet. Extended to 40 storeys it would be what, 377 feet?

If you bumped the average floor height by a little over a foot and a half a floor, that would give you 440 feet, or 20 feet taller than 201 Portage. If there is any kind of penthouse with a tall ceiling, or office podium-type arrangement with a few floors of higher ceilings at Winnipeg Square II, that would mean the average residential floor would only have to be about a foot higher than in 55 Nassau to get to that new tallest height. Maybe not probable, but it definitely seems possible... we shall see.
I am in total agreement.
55 Nassau was designed nearly 50 years ago.. half of a century.. built in the late 1960's... Any upper end residential would have to have in this day and age a 9 foot ceiling rather than 8 ft.. So I also think the same as you do.
I am only concerned that this 300 main project does not get scaled down to less than 40 floors.
We need some skyline height and bragging rights here in Winnipeg.
I also hope that Skycity can make it to 50 + floors with the pentice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 6:15 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,069
ive been on the top of 55 nassa fish pond up there err weight thats evergreen place that has a fishpond on it not kidding about the fish pond... somehow theres minos on the roof everysummer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 2:36 PM
pegcityfan pegcityfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
The cost was mentioned earlier +165M.. This little tidbit from the media was interesting in itself...Barriers at P& M, We'll know Thursday..

http://www.winnipegsun.com/2016/04/0...unced-thursday
Man would that suck if want to keep the barriers. When I read the line in the press "announce the details of its plans for a complete renewal of the existing curtain wall and environmental barrier at 360 Main and will unveil plans for a significant new development on the same site at 300 Main", all I think is they plan on updating their corner, that's it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 2:49 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,327
This announcement has nothing to do with opening P&M. It's for the reno and expansion of the Artis complex. Opening P&M is as easy as ripping down the barriers and repairing the sidewalk. Maybe Artis will make mention of it in their announcement. But i wouldn't bet on it (hopefully I'm wrong and they say let's open up P&M!).

The environmental barriers the speak of seem to be with building systems. Ie: the curtain wall and whatever climate control features they have in place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 3:06 PM
Jeremy6 Jeremy6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 64
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...374535251.html

Similar to the Sun's article but here is the Winnipeg Free Press take on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 3:55 PM
kent_eh kent_eh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I wonder what the chances are that this project could end up being Winnipeg's new tallest? Think about it, 55 Nassau is a relatively old tower that clocks in at 38 storeys, 358 feet. Extended to 40 storeys it would be what, 377 feet?

If you bumped the average floor height by a little over a foot and a half a floor, that would give you 440 feet, or 20 feet taller than 201 Portage. If there is any kind of penthouse with a tall ceiling, or office podium-type arrangement with a few floors of higher ceilings at Winnipeg Square II, that would mean the average residential floor would only have to be about a foot higher than in 55 Nassau to get to that new tallest height. Maybe not probable, but it definitely seems possible... we shall see.

Other than bragging rights, what would be the point though?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 3:57 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by kent_eh View Post
Other than bragging rights, what would be the point though?
Are you sure you're on the right website, my friend?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:06 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,327
Lol That's all we want around here is bragging rights!

So for residential, would floor to floor height not be around 10'? Or is it typically 9'?

Using 10' would give you 400' right off the bat. Another 10' for mechanical on top. Lobby may be double height. And the tower is already going to be sitting up from street level. The square is already ~10' above curb. So we're getting into the range of 430' based on those simple assumptions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:11 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
I hope it is sleek and thin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:13 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Yeah, definitely not far-fetched. I'd imagine that this building would be chasing a mid to upper range demographic, which tells you that they won't be building absolute minimum height levels either.

What's the height on Glasshouse? I couldn't find an actual number. But at 21 storeys, it's probably fair to say that WSII would be a little less than double the height.

Doing some cocktail napkin math, we can say that with 9 ft ceiling heights in Glasshouse + 10'4" on 2-5 and penthouse levels, we're looking at a minimum height of 195.67 feet. I presume a mechanical level/penthouse would push that up at least another 10 feet? Say 205? So taking that average 9.76 feet a floor and multiplying it by 40 gives me 390.4 feet. Less than 30 feet off 201 Portage.

So really, an average ceiling height a bit higher than Glasshouse (or even just an especially tall mechanical level or main floor) would likely push WSII over the top. That wouldn't really take much. An average of 10.6 feet a floor vs. Glasshouse's 9.76 would make WSII the new tallest... that's what, barely 10" per floor difference on average? A combination of a few inches per floor throughout the building, plus maybe an extra foot or two on each of the main, penthouse and mechanical levels,
and you're there. Or perhaps Artis will just jack it up to 42 storeys to satisfy us skyscraper nerds

You STEM guys feel free to shoot holes in my math, it probably wouldn't be too tough to find a mistake in there. But that's where I landed and it looks pretty good!

Last edited by esquire; Apr 5, 2016 at 4:40 PM. Reason: corrected the numbers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:17 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
I hope it is sleek and thin.
Wide and stout. That's the Winnipeg way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:21 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by kent_eh View Post
Other than bragging rights, what would be the point though?
That's just it. Bragging rights.

Helps to sell/rent units when advertised in the "tallest" building in Winnipeg. Or "best views". Or "tallest floor between Toronto and Calgary". Or whatever.

And it could be the tallest in Winnipeg for the foreseeable future - depending on how SkyCity works out. I would think no matter what, it will have that claim for around 5-years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:23 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Wide and stout. That's the Winnipeg way.
I suspect this is changing (i.e. SkyCity)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 4:26 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,327
Maybe Artis will purposely push the building height to be just taller than 201 Portage. Just to say we're the tallest.

I guess we'll find out soon if there are any other plans for the new tower, other than residential. Maybe some lower level office space or street level retail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.