HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2013, 7:03 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Forgive my ignorance but does Edmonton have any existing TOD around any of it's LRT stations?
Yep, two, technically three.

- Century Park - probably the most "TOD" in the current sense. Phase I is complete, but the rest of the project (including the high-rise portion) is stalled right now. It's at the south end of the LRT.

- Clareview - at the end of the NE line. It isn't very walkable, mostly a cluster of '90s and '00s vinyl condo complexes.

- Stadium Station - right now it's more a high rise cluster east of Downtown that just happens to have an LRT station nearby. Plans are to better integrate the station with the community, including potentially moving it closer to population centres (right now it is geared mostly towards Commonwealth Stadium). There are towers ranging in era from the 1960s to now (a massive condo development is currently underway).

There's also...

- Glenora Skyline - currently a TOD under construction immediately west of a leafy 1910s-1930s neighbourhood. I think I posted renders on the 2nd or 3rd page. Decent bus connections, but no LRT yet. It does have plans for it, though, on the map Whyteknight posted, it would be 142 St Station.

- Station Pointe / Belvedere / Fort Road. Currently a somewhat run down former farming community that was swallowed up by Edmonton in the 1950s. Large parts of the commercial area of the community were demolished a few years ago to pave way for a new TOD, called "Station Pointe." Mixed use I believe, it'd have townhouses and condos. New roads were paved, but otherwise, no shovels in the ground. It is on the station before Clareview, in NE Edmonton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2013, 9:16 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,363
Thanks for the in depth reply ue!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2013, 11:51 AM
Windex's Avatar
Windex Windex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Port Moody's early concepts for it's future Evergreen line stations:










http://www.tricitynews.com/news/198195341.htmlhttp://
The amount of density they have aloted for in Port Moody is incredible. If it all gets built out as to the plan, they expect the city's population to essentially double to close to 60k.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2013, 3:53 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 13,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
- Station Pointe / Belvedere / Fort Road. Currently a somewhat run down former farming community that was swallowed up by Edmonton in the 1950s. Large parts of the commercial area of the community were demolished a few years ago to pave way for a new TOD, called "Station Pointe." Mixed use I believe, it'd have townhouses and condos. New roads were paved, but otherwise, no shovels in the ground. It is on the station before Clareview, in NE Edmonton.
Just a correction here. Belvedere was amalgamated in 1913 and was where meatpackers and the Edmonton Stockyards would eventually locate themselves. The area has been largely agricultural-industrial and the area continues to see meatpackers and the stockyards there. They've been slowly trying to insert commercial there but any residential there is sparse until you get to the neighbourhoods nearby.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2013, 1:33 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Demand for office towers tied to transit hubs, report says
Employees prefer to not walk more than 500 metres to get to work

By Kelly Sinoski, Vancouver Sun
April 5, 2013

http://www.vancouversun.com/business...275/story.html
This is solid evidence that Metro Vancouver's regional planning is working. Now not only do people want to live in or near town centres connected to rapid transit but they also want to work there as well. The lower office vacancies and higher lease rates near these nodes are undeniable proof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2013, 1:36 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,660
Interesting how Toronto is increasingly moving more towards being more downtown centred for office growth, after decades of fostering nodes (NYCC and STC), while vancouver is moving to regional nodes. Mind you, the surrounding municipalities are setting up nodes, and nodes are in provincial policy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2013, 1:59 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Thanks for the in depth reply ue!
No problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes View Post
Just a correction here. Belvedere was amalgamated in 1913 and was where meatpackers and the Edmonton Stockyards would eventually locate themselves. The area has been largely agricultural-industrial and the area continues to see meatpackers and the stockyards there. They've been slowly trying to insert commercial there but any residential there is sparse until you get to the neighbourhoods nearby.
Belvedere west of Fort Road is almost entirely residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2013, 6:58 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,363
Some recent Metro Vancouver updates:

Station Square
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post



Sovereign
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Metrotower III
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Metroplace
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Surrey City Hall
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post






Merchant Square
Quote:
Originally Posted by tybuilding View Post
Quintet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2013, 3:35 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,229
Here are two 48 storey condos (will be Ottawa's tallest), as well as one 18 storey condo, proposed next to Carling Station on the O-Train line.



There would be a central square with O-Train access through one of the towers.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2013, 5:54 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
God damn it, Metro Van is rocking it!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2013, 3:48 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,363
^You know it buddy.

A couple Burnaby updates from way too early yesterday morning.

Metroplace




[/QUOTE]

Metrotower III


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2013, 4:03 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,986
A new large TOD for Edmonton in the NE.

http://stationpointegreens.ca


(http://stationpointegreens.ca/wp-con...PG-IMAGE-6.jpg)

Station Pointe Greens (SPG), a 219 unit residential and commercial development in North East Edmonton represents a significant advancement in sustainable affordable high-rise living. Based on years of research and design development by a team of expert consultants, SPG is poised to become a leading edge multi-family residential development for North America incorporating a multitude of sustainability features including:

90% reduction in heating and cooling costs
Near net-zero design (net-zero ready)
100% self contained and user controlled heating/cooling and ventilation (hypo-allergenic design)
On-site waste-water processing and re-use for irrigation and water closets
Passive House design
Roof-top gardens and amenity space
Consisting of 4 connected towers, each with its own co-operative community, SPG will provide both affordable ownership and continuing cooperative home options in one of the most environmentally advanced and energy efficient multi-family developments in North America.

All units will have underground parking and secured bicycle storage. Plans include an on-site daycare, large community amenity space, and accessible rooftop lounge and gardens for residents to grow flowers and vegetables and enjoy year round.

The ground floor facing Fort Road will contain commercial spaces which will be designed to provide complementary goods and services to both the residents and community at large. SPG is ideally located just a 5 minute walk to the Belvedere LRT and bus hub.

Consisting of 4 connected towers, each with its own co-operative community, SPG provides both ownership and continuing cooperative home options within the cooperative community model.

Tower A (West corner) will consist of 25 apartments occupied by persons connected to the arts community and is sponsored by Artist Urban Village.
Tower B (mid-block) will consist of 45 apartments sponsored by CPA (Canadian Paraplegic Association) with 10 units targeted to persons in wheelchairs.
Tower C(North corner) will consist of 85 units sponsored by the University Housing Co-op, and is primarily targeted to students, staff and faculty of post-secondary institutions.
Tower D (North East side) will consist of 54 apartments and is being considered for development as a mature adult 55+ community, with apartments available for both regular and life-lease occupancy.
Townhouses (10) will face South East onto the inner street.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2013, 2:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,986
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2013, 3:33 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
Here is a project near the university in Calgary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
University City, taken by Design-Mind:


DSC_3052 by earl_of_design, on Flickr
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2013, 6:11 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
University City is much nicer in person. The view of it from Nose Hill is actually pretty cool, with the colourfull towers and then the Childrens hospital behind in the distance it looks like a really cool colourful area It will look pretty sweet once phases 3 & 4 are done.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 5:03 AM
thomax's Avatar
thomax thomax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,380
Hamilton | James Street North GO Station (Design Unveiled)


Source

[LINK] - Design for new James North GO station unveiled

Daniel Nolan
Tue Apr 30 2013 22:48:00


Passenger service is proposed to return to James Street North in the form of a two-storey glass building that is reminiscent of the MacNab Street Transit Terminal in downtown Hamilton.

The proposed station, set to open in time for the 2015 Pan Am Games, will be located just east of the MacNab Street North bridge.

It will be attached to a plaza that will stretch to James Street North — just across from LIUNA Station (which was built as the CN station in 1930) — and the plaza is proposed to have bus bays, pedestrian walkways and areas for public art.

The station will be level with MacNab Street and the bottom floor will be about eight metres below and level with the tracks. This is because the rail line is located in a bit of a valley between Stuart Street and Strachan Street West.

That, at any rate, was the vision shown to about 40 people specially invited to a Metrolinx meeting Tuesday night at the Workers Arts and Heritage Centre on Stuart Street.

Those stakeholders in attendance included Mayor Bob Bratina, councillors Brian McHattie and Jason Farr, plus city officials, representatives of neighbourhood associations, the waterfront trust and the Hamilton-Burlington Society of Architects.

The station is to be a supplement to the Hamilton GO Centre (the former TH&B station) several blocks south of the proposed site, although attendees were told it will be developed as a mobility hub. It will connect with other transit such as buses and the proposed A-line Light Rail Transit (LRT) between the bayfront and the John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport.

There are plans for a parking garage, easy exit for cars and a kiss-and-go spot.

Metrolinx official Randal Dreise said the platforms will be 350 metres long, stretching from James Street North to Hess Street North and Stuart Street.

That will see it stretch onto land that once housed a majestic train station linked to Hamilton’s development. A station was built off Stuart Street by the Great Western Railway in 1875. The GWR was swallowed up by the Grand Trunk Railway in the 1880s.

The station stood until the 1920s, when it was replaced by the CN station. The new station opened in 1931 and served passengers — the last being GO commuters — until 1993.

Dreise said, however, negotiations remain to make the station a reality — negotiations with CN to acquire tracks for the GO trains, negotiations with CN to provide all-day GO service and negotiations with land owners to build the plaza.

Bratina, a well-known rail buff who pushed for the return of GO service at James Street North, said he liked the proposed station design and that he never expected there would be some “grand station.”

“It’s the service that counts, but a simple and elegant plan would enhance the neighbourhood,” he said. “I think it goes in hand with the growth of the service, but the desire to keep costs in hand.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 6:54 PM
thomax's Avatar
thomax thomax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,380
Hamilton | James Street North GO Station (Renderings & Site Plan)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted May 2, 2013, 12:44 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Here's a question for everyone on TOD in Canada.

Can anyone think of an example of TOD in Canada which came about by way of the conversion of many single detached houses of reasonable quality (i.e. not owned by slumlords but owner-occupied)?

To be clear, I don't mean the turning of storefronts or parking lots or old shopping malls or small apartment blocks or even a random detached house contiguous with one of the foregoing into TOD, I mean the out and out wholesale conversion of multiple single family detached houses in a "typical" residential neighbourhood.

The reason I'm asking is because Ottawa is currently debating a western extension of the LRT line it is about to begin building, and a number of route options would bring the line through and place a station in a fairly typical older residential neighbourhood dominated by a mix of inter-war and early post-war housing (much of which was built when the area previously had a tramway running through...). There is a "fear" (somewhat hyped by a local former newspaper columnist) that the area could turn into a "wall of condos" and "destroy" the neighbourhood.

It is my contention however that this is highly unlikely. Based on what I have seen in Calgary and even Toronto, it seems most owner-occupied detached housing does not get converted to high density TOD in the vicinity of rapid transit stations.

So can anyone think of such a TOD in Canada?
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted May 2, 2013, 1:15 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant/Downtown South
Posts: 6,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
Here's a question for everyone on TOD in Canada.

Can anyone think of an example of TOD in Canada which came about by way of the conversion of many single detached houses of reasonable quality (i.e. not owned by slumlords but owner-occupied)?

To be clear, I don't mean the turning of storefronts or parking lots or old shopping malls or small apartment blocks or even a random detached house contiguous with one of the foregoing into TOD, I mean the out and out wholesale conversion of multiple single family detached houses in a "typical" residential neighbourhood.

The reason I'm asking is because Ottawa is currently debating a western extension of the LRT line it is about to begin building, and a number of route options would bring the line through and place a station in a fairly typical older residential neighbourhood dominated by a mix of inter-war and early post-war housing (much of which was built when the area previously had a tramway running through...). There is a "fear" (somewhat hyped by a local former newspaper columnist) that the area could turn into a "wall of condos" and "destroy" the neighbourhood.

It is my contention however that this is highly unlikely. Based on what I have seen in Calgary and even Toronto, it seems most owner-occupied detached housing does not get converted to high density TOD in the vicinity of rapid transit stations.

So can anyone think of such a TOD in Canada?
This is the only development that meet your criteria that is actually happening in Vancouver.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=191466

Cambie Street, where the Canada Line runs along, is a residential street that will be redeveloped into high density. That's the plan anyway.

http://vancouver.ca/home-property-de...idor-plan.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted May 2, 2013, 1:42 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,660
It's happening in Toronto too, NYCC was a suburb 20 years ago, now the first block or two off of yonge street (Which used to be suburban streets) are highrises. also on the Sheppard subway, the NY towers development ripped up an old subdivision and built 5 towers, 8 midrises, and more on the way.

2002 (after the first 4 towers started, but it is the earliest available satellite imagery)



2009 (most recent imagery, the houses between the 4 towers and the main street have since been replaced) most of the lowrise housing south of sheppard between bayview and bessarion is accounted for now, with developments in the pipeline.


Last edited by Innsertnamehere; May 2, 2013 at 1:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.