HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2014, 5:49 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,512
US states by weighted population density

Weighted population density scales each subdivision to have a weight proportional to its population. Mathematically, WPD = Sum(Population Density * Proportion of state's population). It's also equivalent to the density experienced by the average inhabitant of each state.

The US Census Bureau has weighted population density data for metro areas, but no one seems to have calculated such densities for states. So I pulled the census tract data from the 2010 Census and calculated in people per square mile.

New York -- 28,161.5
Hawaii -- 8,479.7
California -- 8,213.0
New Jersey -- 7,940.6
Illinois -- 6,660.8
Massachusetts -- 6,585.6
Nevada -- 5,419.5
Rhode Island -- 5,034.0
Pennsylvania -- 4,886.8
Maryland -- 4,555.0
Florida -- 3,750.6
Connecticut -- 3,583.0
Arizona -- 3,582.5
Colorado -- 3,500.0
Utah -- 3,429.9
Washington -- 3,344.8
Virginia -- 3,249.6
Texas -- 3,138.6
Oregon -- 3,113.8
Delaware -- 2,643.5
Wisconsin -- 2,598.5
Michigan -- 2,527.3
Minnesota -- 2,416.5
Ohio -- 2,388.8
Nebraska -- 2,285.2
New Mexico -- 2,108.8
Louisiana -- 1,931.2
Missouri -- 1,895.7
Alaska -- 1,834.1
Kansas -- 1,772.6
Indiana -- 1,740.0
Oklahoma -- 1,602.3
North Dakota -- 1,569.1
Georgia -- 1,550.9
Idaho -- 1,488.8
Kentucky -- 1,464.2
Iowa -- 1,463.1
New Hampshire -- 1,320.9
Tennessee -- 1,288.4
North Carolina -- 1,181.9
Montana -- 1,088.3
South Dakota -- 1,045.9
South Carolina -- 1,018.7
Wyoming -- 998.5
Vermont -- 947.2
Alabama -- 942.2
Maine -- 881.7
Arkansas -- 807.9
West Virginia -- 792.1
Mississippi -- 694.9

New York, as expected, is a factor of four above any other state, but second place was a bit surprising. The rugged terrain of Hawaii forces settlements to build up and denser rather than spreading out, and its small size means little rural area to pull the number down. A lack of significant rural population is also why Alaska is 29th in weighted density, as Anchorage alone is nearly half the state.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.

Last edited by ChiSoxRox; Jun 16, 2014 at 6:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2021, 11:24 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,512
Here is an update for the 2020 Census. (This thread is the top Google result for "state weighted population density")

New York......30,854.3
(D. of Columbia......20,642.9)
Hawaii......9,251.8
New Jersey......9,013.3
California......8,545.5
Massachusetts......7,436.3
Illinois......7,053.0
Nevada......5,920.6
Rhode Island......5,508.5
Pennsylvania......5,224.1
Maryland......4,696.1
Washington......4,246.9
Florida......4,224.5
Arizona......3,962.9
Colorado......3,962.4
Connecticut......3,769.0
Utah......3,699.5
Oregon......3,663.1
Virginia......3,587.8
Texas......3,458.9
Minnesota......2,769.3
Wisconsin......2,712.5
Michigan......2,613.6
Delaware......2,590.7
Ohio......2,486.2
Nebraska......2,442.7
New Mexico......2,218.1
Louisiana......2,069.4
Idaho......2,021.8
Missouri......1,986.4
Georgia......1,918.5
Kansas ......1,885.9
Indiana......1,841.2
Alaska......1,798.8
Oklahoma......1,748.2
North Dakota......1,683.3
Iowa......1,622.3
Kentucky......1,572.0
New Hampshire......1,458.8
Tennessee......1,430.5
North Carolina......1,415.8
Montana......1,189.9
South Dakota......1,181.4
South Carolina......1,161.4
Wyoming......1,034.2
Maine......1,007.6
Alabama......991.2
Vermont......957.7
Arkansas......942.5
West Virginia......856.1
Mississippi......750.8
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2021, 4:17 AM
SFBruin SFBruin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,190
I'm kind of surprised that Illinois is so low.

I guess the suburbs of Chicago aren't particularly dense.
__________________
Pretend Seattleite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 2:06 AM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBruin View Post
I'm kind of surprised that Illinois is so low.

I guess the suburbs of Chicago aren't particularly dense.
Outside of Chicago metro Illinois is mostly farms and small towns. 90% of Illinois looks like this:

Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.