HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


    360 10th Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2015, 1:19 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,691
^sq footage could also be kept low by unusually lofty ceiling heights. We'll probably see ceiling heights in this one approach or match modern office standards, probably ~15 ft.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2015, 1:23 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
Just doing that, 15 ft, would make this over a 1000 feet. Assuming 1st floor is much higher due to a lobby, this under that assumption would be about 1020 feet or so. Now add mechanical, and it could be close to 1100 feet. But depending on how they design it (Maybe a crown, spire or some archi elements to push it up), it could much taller. Either way, we have a minimum of a 1000 which is a good starting point for speculation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2015, 3:34 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,509
Let's see, 432 Park is 700ksf. It could be wider than 432 Park and still be 1400'.

Edit: Hmm, wiki(400k) and CTBUH(700k) have different areas for 432 Park. Time to recheck the permits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2015, 4:18 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
Let's see, 432 Park is 700ksf. It could be wider than 432 Park and still be 1400'.
Maybe the difference is between the residential floorspace and the total building square footage? Keep in mind that 432 Park has a pretty sizable retail element, as well as numerous below-ground levels.

In contrast, this Hudson Yards tower will not have extensive retail. It will probably be a bulkier tower, even if it rises to 1,400 ft.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2015, 4:23 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,206
Also keep in mind that the 733k is probably total "zoned" floor space, which doesn't included mechanical. Mechanical totals always make these tower significantly larger.

But I would suspect a hotel component with this tower. The tie in to the High Line alone will make this a draw.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 12:47 AM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
I would love for MSG to move at the Morgan site. It would make that area so much better and at the same time, use the huge amount if air rights waiting to be used to build tall around Penn Station.

Via MAS NYC
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 1:00 AM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 832
I walked by the site today. I wonder when something will rise here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 8:45 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,161
just going to drop this here... *nonchalantly whistles*


118 East 59th, Soo K Chan, SCDA, Euro Properties, Billionaires Row, Midtown skyscraper (4) by cityrealty_nyc, on Flickr

__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 9:02 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 832
Bloody hell! Where did that come from? That looks around 1,300'!

This is the Age of Ramses, lads!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 9:04 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
Awsome! Great timing as its friday, and one supertall a week is what where aiming at. Ramses himself would want that, and his legacy lives!

I'd say 1300 feet too. Possibly 1350 ft. Looks like a new signature tower for the HY region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 9:52 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
Hell yea!! My eagle eye says its 1,350+.

__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)

Last edited by Vertical_Gotham; Jul 17, 2015 at 10:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 10:56 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 832
Are we sure that's 360 10th and not another site a little further south and west? If it is 360, it looks to be over 1,600'. 360 is across 10th Ave from Coach. Coach is 895', and this looks almost twice as tall as that.

PS: Where did that render come from? I actually checked the DOB permits for 360 10th last night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 11:03 PM
Cynicism Cynicism is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 100
.

Last edited by Cynicism; Aug 10, 2020 at 10:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 11:53 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynicism View Post
I assume that site has a lot of rights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2015, 2:34 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vertical_Gotham View Post
I would love for MSG to move at the Morgan site. It would make that area so much better and at the same time, use the huge amount if air rights waiting to be used to build tall around Penn Station.
Not gonna happen, for a variety of reason. And MSG's best option was the backside of Farley, and even that was deemed to "far".

Anyway, we know that SHoP's planned supertall could be "as high" as 1,400 ft or so, (or at least a supertall). It could very well be taller than 30 Hudson. We'll just have to wait and see.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 11:05 PM
baseball1992 baseball1992 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
Are we sure that's 360 10th and not another site a little further south and west? If it is 360, it looks to be over 1,600'. 360 is across 10th Ave from Coach. Coach is 895', and this looks almost twice as tall as that.

PS: Where did that render come from? I actually checked the DOB permits for 360 10th last night.
Unless there is a a development site further south that a supertall could possibly rise from that we don't know about, this looks spot on with 360 10th Ave,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2015, 11:14 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
I'm pretty sure it matches 360 10th Ave. My first thought was the Tishman Spire site, but it's too far off. An article or some kind of news would be nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2015, 1:51 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
Are we sure that's 360 10th and not another site a little further south and west? If it is 360, it looks to be over 1,600'. 360 is across 10th Ave from Coach. Coach is 895', and this looks almost twice as tall as that.

PS: Where did that render come from? I actually checked the DOB permits for 360 10th last night.
You're right, it does appear further south. I just think whomever made it did not place the tower location correctly. Because of zoning, I'm pretty sure a tower over 1,000' isn't even possible south of 30th street at the high line/ Hudson Yards. I dunno.
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2015, 9:21 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 832
I walked by today and wondered if Hines is trying to buy the adjacent building, 450 W 31st Street. However, as per ACRIS, Sherwood, Hines' predecessor, already bought the development rights.

Here's the relevant entry:

7/19/2013

DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

450 WEST 31ST OWNERS CORP.

SHERWOOD 30 LAND GROUP LLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2015, 9:33 PM
sbarn sbarn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
I walked by today and wondered if Hines is trying to buy the adjacent building, 450 W 31st Street. However, as per ACRIS, Sherwood, Hines' predecessor, already bought the development rights.

Here's the relevant entry:

7/19/2013

DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

450 WEST 31ST OWNERS CORP.

SHERWOOD 30 LAND GROUP LLC
No. Its a condo with multiple owners.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.