HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2941  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 2:31 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvATX View Post
I think there were two renderings. One with a 3 floor amenity level and one 2 floors. I kind of wish it was the 3 floor version.
I done-diddly told y'all it was only two levels a few months ago. This version I think includes a more squat crown with fewer pillars too right?

Not this (which is much nicer imo):


Ugh, again, hate the burnt orange and white. I wonder if that was truly on purpose.

Last edited by ahealy; Sep 30, 2024 at 2:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2942  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 4:27 PM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 526
The designers definitely left a lot on the table with this one; from this-trend-won't-age-well cringe-inducing angled exposed beams, to the "Bellagio hotel effect" of the upper section "two floors per brick." (Why build supertall if you're going to employ visual effects to minimize that?)

Maybe the final product will change my mind. Still glad its being built though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2943  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 4:55 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 804
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2944  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 7:53 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,422




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2945  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 3:24 AM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by zrx299 View Post
The designers definitely left a lot on the table with this one; from this-trend-won't-age-well cringe-inducing angled exposed beams, to the "Bellagio hotel effect" of the upper section "two floors per brick." (Why build supertall if you're going to employ visual effects to minimize that?)

Maybe the final product will change my mind. Still glad its being built though.
My feelings as well--we shall see. The crown and final color scheme will make or break this for Austin. It's a wild gamble considering it'll be the tallest and command so much attention.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2946  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 2:23 PM
Savant8 Savant8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
My feelings as well--we shall see. The crown and final color scheme will make or break this for Austin. It's a wild gamble considering it'll be the tallest and command so much attention.
I don't think the color scheme is that bad. While no means perfect, its definitely better than just a plain boring blue glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2947  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2024, 3:14 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,790
One thing that I have noticed a little is now that the angle of the sun is getting lower, with the way the tower angles, from the board walk, the tower looks pretty stunning and while some may not like to hear this, has a bluish reflective look to it. Looking at it from Congress with the sun directly hitting, the windows look dark so the glass does have some neat reflection features.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2948  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2024, 1:21 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savant8 View Post
I don't think the color scheme is that bad. While no means perfect, its definitely better than just a plain boring blue glass.
Normally I'd agree, but in person it just looks cheap af with the white and burnt orange. This tower would look much better if they just swapped the orange with a light grey or even mint green.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2949  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2024, 9:53 PM
Monarch's Avatar
Monarch Monarch is offline
favorite son
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
Normally I'd agree, but in person it just looks cheap af with the white and burnt orange. This tower would look much better if they just swapped the orange with a light grey or even mint green.

^^^ OMG! what...?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2950  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 2:58 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
Normally I'd agree, but in person it just looks cheap af with the white and burnt orange. This tower would look much better if they just swapped the orange with a light grey or even mint green.
Its the white that makes it look cheap, not the orange. Swap the white with black and you’ve got a winner.
__________________
Houston: 2314k (+0%) + MSA suburbs: 5196k (+7%) + CSA exurbs: 196k (+3%)
Dallas: 1303k (-0%) + MSA div. suburbs: 4160k (9%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 457k (+6%)
Ft. Worth: 978k (+6%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1659k (+4%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 98k (+8%)
San Antonio: 1495k (+4%) + MSA suburbs: 1209k (+8%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 980k (+2%) + MSA suburbs: 1493k (+13%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2951  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 1:32 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monarch View Post

^^^ OMG! what...?
Hahah! Sorry

@wwmiv -- You're right, that would look sick af. For the record, I agree and like burnt orange a lot as a color....just not with white....

again, sorry! Not trynna troll my UT buddies lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2952  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2024, 8:27 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,859
I’m one who’s enjoying the white, with that and the angles of this building it sure is becoming an eye catcher. This is mostly dressed up in glass so it doesn’t give the cheap look of WC housing to me.

Its new neighbors all look value engineered. I want to give Travis a pass but I’m not sure what’s going on there. ATX Tower is the most recent building completed that I like.





__________________
HAIF

Last edited by Urbannizer; Oct 15, 2024 at 6:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2953  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2024, 2:02 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,422
This ones taking awhile to go to the next floor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2954  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2024, 2:48 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,355
It should speed up now that they’re on the residential floors. I think Travis will turn out nice, but the Modern will end up looking like 6G with a very unfinished appearance. Paseo I’ll wait until it’s done to have an opinion on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2955  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2024, 1:13 AM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,403
The first and second photos give me strong Long Island City vibes. A string of tall, modern residential towers somewhat isolated from the other peaks of the skyline. The proximity to water doesn't hurt either. It'll be interesting to see how that group looks with the cranes down at Paseo/Travis/Modern.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2956  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2024, 4:00 PM
futuresooner's Avatar
futuresooner futuresooner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,257
Heading northbound on Congress from roughly Ramble Rd to St. Elmo, this beast is looming large on the horizon already. It's almost perfectly framed, really.
__________________
"When you don't want to Dallas your Austin, you just emulate the Bay Area."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2957  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2024, 11:57 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,859


__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2958  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2024, 1:14 PM
resansom resansom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 273
Looks like this thing is about to become the tallest building in the Rainey St. district - a title it may well hold for a very long time...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2959  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2024, 3:19 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,790
They have raised up a sign or giant poster or whatever facing the southwest that says Waterline that can be seen at a pretty good distance.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2960  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2024, 7:20 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,422
^^ I was about to mention this. I saw it yesterday!

--
Anyone know how to make Imgur photos smaller? Mine seems really big
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.