HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4821  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2024, 10:02 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
It’s almost like you think VW will actually build that battery plant. Cute.
If you are talking about St Thomas, it's not a rumour, the foundation is being poured as we speak. This was the fastest start to construction after an announcement I have ever seen. Ford and Trudeau were downtown making the announcement and the heavy machinery was out in the field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4822  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2024, 10:03 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,414
Hyundai and GM to work together on developing new cars

By Juliana Liu, CNN
Thu September 12, 2024


Hong Kong
CNN

Hyundai and General Motors (GM) have agreed to look for ways to work together on developing new vehicles, supply chains and technologies in an effort to cut costs and move more quickly.

Global carmakers are under intense pressure to come up with new electric vehicle (EV) and battery technology because they face vehicle emissions regulations around the world. Those research and development efforts could cost tens of billions of dollars.

They’re also facing an onslaught of potential competition from Chinese automakers, particularly EV producers, trying to export their lower-cost models overseas in order to escape a huge oversupply problem at home.

South Korea’s Hyundai and America’s GM (GM) said on Thursday they would collaborate on joint product development, manufacturing and future clean energy technologies. They plan to work together on internal combustion, clean-energy, electric and hydrogen vehicles.

...

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/12/cars/...hnk/index.html
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4823  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2024, 10:17 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
It’s almost like you think VW will actually build that battery plant. Cute.
It's almost like you have no clue what's happening in Southwestern Ontario cause you don't live anywhere close.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4824  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2024, 11:56 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
If you are talking about St Thomas, it's not a rumour, the foundation is being poured as we speak. This was the fastest start to construction after an announcement I have ever seen. Ford and Trudeau were downtown making the announcement and the heavy machinery was out in the field.
Barring any hiccups, they are on track for 2027 opening, which is incredible for a megaproject of this size. I guess it's big for Canada, but maybe not for major battery OEMs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4825  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 1:45 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
If you are talking about St Thomas, it's not a rumour, the foundation is being poured as we speak. This was the fastest start to construction after an announcement I have ever seen. Ford and Trudeau were downtown making the announcement and the heavy machinery was out in the field.
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4826  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 10:50 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
What does this have to do with your ignorance about the plant under construction? Also, VW going under is about as likely as Ford going under. Less so. Because VW is more important to Germany than Ford is to America.

You're also proving our point of why these companies need to be subsidized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4827  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 3:32 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Hamilton, formerly Norfolk County
Posts: 1,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
If you are talking about St Thomas, it's not a rumour, the foundation is being poured as we speak. This was the fastest start to construction after an announcement I have ever seen. Ford and Trudeau were downtown making the announcement and the heavy machinery was out in the field.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Barring any hiccups, they are on track for 2027 opening, which is incredible for a megaproject of this size. I guess it's big for Canada, but maybe not for major battery OEMs.
They might be pouring, and that's a very good sign, everything else is on hold. We were expecting the steel contract to be awarded in the spring, now it's a "maybe" for fall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4828  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 7:21 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
The subsidies are there to help our industry. Because they underinvested for so long.
I think the tarriffs on Chinese imports and subsidies of our legacy OEMs should have an expiry date. For the sake of argument, let's say 2030. Our legacy OEMs should have 6 years to get their asses in gear; it's like a headstart to a race against a superior opponent. But you still have to run.

If we don't allow these to sunset, I fear our legacy OEMs will just be protected against their inferior products and we'll have an embarrassingly low EV penetration rate well into the future.

Or the Chinese will advance to the point where they manage to sell a profitable EV in North America that undercuts the price point of their Western competitors, even with a 100% tarriff slapped on them. Then what are we going to do? Slap a 200% tarriff on Chinese EVs?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4829  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 8:38 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
I think the tarriffs on Chinese imports and subsidies of our legacy OEMs should have an expiry date. For the sake of argument, let's say 2030. Our legacy OEMs should have 6 years to get their asses in gear; it's like a headstart to a race against a superior opponent. But you still have to run.

If we don't allow these to sunset, I fear our legacy OEMs will just be protected against their inferior products and we'll have an embarrassingly low EV penetration rate well into the future.

Or the Chinese will advance to the point where they manage to sell a profitable EV in North America that undercuts the price point of their Western competitors, even with a 100% tarriff slapped on them. Then what are we going to do? Slap a 200% tarriff on Chinese EVs?
Well with Milk and cheese we do have a 200% tarriff. Foreign imports would very much be competitive with only a 100% tarriff.

As an aside why do people in Teslas drive so slow on the highway? Is it to save range or are they using autopilot so easier to stick in the right lane?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4830  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 10:21 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny24 View Post
They might be pouring, and that's a very good sign, everything else is on hold. We were expecting the steel contract to be awarded in the spring, now it's a "maybe" for fall.
It's normal. They will have to review and realign both opening and launch capacity given what's happening in Germany. And I suspect there might even be a view to politics in the US, before they decide on final capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4831  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2024, 10:27 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
I think the tarriffs on Chinese imports and subsidies of our legacy OEMs should have an expiry date. For the sake of argument, let's say 2030. Our legacy OEMs should have 6 years to get their asses in gear; it's like a headstart to a race against a superior opponent. But you still have to run.

If we don't allow these to sunset, I fear our legacy OEMs will just be protected against their inferior products and we'll have an embarrassingly low EV penetration rate well into the future.

Or the Chinese will advance to the point where they manage to sell a profitable EV in North America that undercuts the price point of their Western competitors, even with a 100% tarriff slapped on them. Then what are we going to do? Slap a 200% tarriff on Chinese EVs?
No need for deadlines. The OEMs are already shitting themselves watching Chinese OEMs at home (till 2022 basically the 2nd or 3rd most profitable market for most legacy Western and Asian OEMs). Now they are watching some of those guys build plants in Europe while share in China erodes and these brands are expanding into lots of the same developing markets that were supposed to replace China.

You'll notice that VW, BMW, etc all came out against tariffs in Europe. Look at their sales in China. Those companies will be in trouble globally if sales in China went to zero.

Last edited by Truenorth00; Sep 17, 2024 at 11:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4832  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2024, 8:17 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Just another reminder what kind of person Tesla buyers support. This can't just be shrugged off:

The US Secret Service says it is "aware" of a social media post by Elon Musk in which he said that "no one is even trying" to assassinate President Joe Biden or Vice-President Kamala Harris.

Mr Musk has since deleted the post and said it was intended as a joke....


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74882jq39vo
Too late I already shrugged it off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4833  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2024, 3:11 AM
rdaner rdaner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 230
I saw in a Toronto paper today that Canadian carbon emissions are continuing to trend down and I wonder if the appearance of EVs is contributing to that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4834  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2024, 3:57 AM
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 9,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdaner View Post
I saw in a Toronto paper today that Canadian carbon emissions are continuing to trend down and I wonder if the appearance of EVs is contributing to that?
Every little bit helps. We are in this together and need to all do our part.

That said, large industrial users are the major contributors and with the help of the carbon tax and other measures they are aggressively moving as well.

We should not discount the contribution consumers are making. It is important and should be celebrated and encouraged.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4835  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2024, 8:35 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Just another reminder what kind of person Tesla buyers support. This can't just be shrugged off:

The US Secret Service says it is "aware" of a social media post by Elon Musk in which he said that "no one is even trying" to assassinate President Joe Biden or Vice-President Kamala Harris.

Mr Musk has since deleted the post and said it was intended as a joke....


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74882jq39vo
And what kind of person is that?

Crazies gonna be crazy, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4836  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2024, 10:54 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,711
What our Western press never talks about: legacy OEMs are in trouble globally largely because they are in trouble in the Chinese market. And they are largely in trouble there because they failed to electrify. Toyota is barely holding on there because of its portfolio of hybrids. If only these companies had taken a decade and a half of record profits in China and put it towards electrification. Instead, they are seeing sales halved between 2017 and 2024. Incredible incompetence from their executives. And next up, will be all the markets which don't have a dog in this fight and won't protect legacy OEMs.


Quote:
The China trend is not their friend.

Nissan, GM, VW and others are tanking hard in China.

"Dunne predicts that most of the world’s biggest car companies will depart the Chinese market within the next five years."

“If you stay in the joint venture and make no changes, your exit is inevitable,”

Via @thewirechina: The China Cliff For Foreign Carmakers

https://www.thewirechina.com/2024/09...ling-in-china/



BYD about same size as Ford. Geely closing in on Honda.
https://x.com/dunne_insights/status/...OPkcSIGKw&s=19
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4837  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2024, 7:06 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
What our Western press never talks about: legacy OEMs are in trouble globally largely because they are in trouble in the Chinese market. And they are largely in trouble there because they failed to electrify. Toyota is barely holding on there because of its portfolio of hybrids. If only these companies had taken a decade and a half of record profits in China and put it towards electrification. Instead, they are seeing sales halved between 2017 and 2024. Incredible incompetence from their executives. And next up, will be all the markets which don't have a dog in this fight and won't protect legacy OEMs.
Yep. They never should have been foolish enough to believe China wouldn't pull the rug out from them once the joint ventures had siphoned off the knowledge they could get from them.

Was watching a segment showing how poor plant usage was in China and in much of North America. The execption: EV holdouts Toyota and Honda.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4838  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 12:57 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Yep. They never should have been foolish enough to believe China wouldn't pull the rug out from them once the joint ventures had siphoned off the knowledge they could get from them.

Was watching a segment showing how poor plant usage was in China and in much of North America. The execption: EV holdouts Toyota and Honda.
Chinese car companies are way ahead of legacy vehicle manufacturers in Europe, North America, and Japan in terms of battery and charging technology. That's the technology that really matters. Only Tesla comes close, and they're not innovating as fast as Chinese manufacturers, partly because they take obscure side paths like the Cyber truck, rather than concentrating on developing less expensive models, or ramping up production of the semi truck.

"In the quarter ended June 30, income from Toyota’s Chinese joint ventures plummeted 73% compared with a year earlier, according to financial statements." [Source]

"Honda reportedly is cutting jobs as it suspended production at three Chinese plants.

Citing local media reports, Bloomberg said the automaker offered redundancy packages to 2,000 workers at its joint venture with Chinese state owned Dongfeng Motor. The staff optimisation was part of a strategy to ensure sustainable operations and speed up its transition to electric vehicles, Dongfeng Honda reportedly said in a statement on social media.

Production at three plants had been suspended for about two weeks from Aug 26 to reduce inventory, Honda told Bloomberg in an emailed statement.

But the automaker declined to comment further on the job cuts and Dongfeng didn’t immediately respond to Bloomberg requests for comment.

Honda’s China sales plummeted 21.48% in the first half of 2024, the report noted, adding the automaker slashed the number of workers at another joint venture with Guangzhou Automobile earlier this year."
[Source]
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Changing City; Oct 3, 2024 at 1:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4839  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 1:33 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Chinese car companies are way ahead of legacy vehicle manufacturers in Europe, North America, and Japan in terms of battery and charging technology. That's the technology that really matters. Only Tesla comes close, and they're not innovating as fast as Chinese manufacturers, partly because they take obscure side paths like the Cyber truck, rather than concentrating on developing less expensive models, or ramping up production of the semi truck.

"In the quarter ended June 30, income from Toyota’s Chinese joint ventures plummeted 73% compared with a year earlier, according to financial statements." [Source]

"Honda reportedly is cutting jobs as it suspended production at three Chinese plants.

Citing local media reports, Bloomberg said the automaker offered redundancy packages to 2,000 workers at its joint venture with Chinese state owned Dongfeng Motor. The staff optimisation was part of a strategy to ensure sustainable operations and speed up its transition to electric vehicles, Dongfeng Honda reportedly said in a statement on social media.

Production at three plants had been suspended for about two weeks from Aug 26 to reduce inventory, Honda told Bloomberg in an emailed statement.

But the automaker declined to comment further on the job cuts and Dongfeng didn’t immediately respond to Bloomberg requests for comment.

Honda’s China sales plummeted 21.48% in the first half of 2024, the report noted, adding the automaker slashed the number of workers at another joint venture with Guangzhou Automobile earlier this year."
[Source]
Honda and Toyota operations in North America are doing just fine. Decoupling will make Chinese cars irrelevant in the West.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4840  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 2:50 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Honda and Toyota operations in North America are doing just fine. Decoupling will make Chinese cars irrelevant in the West.
North America isn't 'the West', and it's not as important as it once was to global vehicle manufacturers. Honda still seem to be committed to full electrification of the brand, although they're starting from a long way back in comparison to other brands. Toyota isn't on the same page, and they have to move fast to remain relevant in the US or Canada, assuming the California requirements for 100% sales of EVs or PHEVs stays in effect. That's an eighth of US vehicle registrations. And Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Washington D.C. follow where California leads.

Meanwhile if Chinese vehicle manufacturers continue to innovate and expand production into Europe, Asia and Central and Southern America they could take a huge chunk out of legacy manufacturers markets, and profits.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.