HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #701  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 8:05 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Rezoning application for 1030-1070 East Hastings

Quote:
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from M-1 (Industrial) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 38-storey mixed-use building and includes:

382 rental residential units;
Commercial space on the ground floor;
A floor space ratio (FSR) of 16.1; and
A building height of 105.5 m (364 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space.
(External link)

This application is being considered under the Downtown Eastside Plan.(External link) The application requests consideration of height and density in excess of the existing policy.

This application is being processed and reviewed concurrently with the application to rezone 1115-1127 E Hastings St and 1168-1180 E Hastings St.
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1030-1070-e-hastings-st

The other neighbouring applications

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1115-1127-e-hastings-st

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1168-1180-e-hastings-st
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #702  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 8:17 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I thought Westbank was having a lot of issues recently?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #703  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 8:36 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I thought Westbank was having a lot of issues recently?
BC Housing might finance it so Westbank is more of a project manager.

Promerita is the land owner, Westbank is the developer

https://www.promerita.com/

Page 10 of the rezoning booklet has details from BC Housing

https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applic...on-booklet.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #704  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2024, 8:56 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
BC Housing might finance it so Westbank is more of a project manager.

Promerita is the land owner, Westbank is the developer

https://www.promerita.com/

Page 10 of the rezoning booklet has details from BC Housing

https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applic...on-booklet.pdf
Ah, thank you!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #705  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2024, 10:48 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,278
546 W 13th Ave / 13 Floors / August 24th, 2024





135 Social Housing Apartments

Rezoning Application Submitted – November 2020
Building Permit Issued – September 2023

https://www.instagram.com/p/C_rGOY2S...o4NDNqcG9kZA==

Note the tower crane base hiding in the corner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #706  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 4:38 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,535
A few new towers for Hastings, along with some massing preview of what could be.





https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnwest...Npmg7LhQ%3D%3D
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #707  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 5:34 PM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,041
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #708  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 6:15 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant/Downtown South
Posts: 7,179
This is great and all, but it won’t be a catalyst for change unless the dtes policy eases up on the social housing requirements and is more generous with density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #709  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 6:24 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,526
I'm not sure how I feel about this new proliferation of Middle-East/Mediterranean dialectic-style "arches" and arch-openings in quite a number of new development proposals these days.

While not necessarily being against revivalist styles, some the applications are begining to feel,.... 'forced', and almost over-wrought in their execution.

I get wanting to get away from 'cookie-cutter', but at that same time I just not quite on board with this being the way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #710  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 6:56 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
This is great and all, but it won’t be a catalyst for change unless the dtes policy eases up on the social housing requirements and is more generous with density.
This project seems to have found a way to meet the requirements for social housing, and 23.3 FSR seems like plenty of density.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #711  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 7:57 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,278
R1-1 Multiplex September 2024 Update



Quote:
Over 200 multiplex applications, totalling 842 homes, have been submitted since the R1-1 zone came into effect last October. Yet many are on lots eligible for even higher density, & only 8 permits amounting to 32 homes have been issued.
https://cityduo.wordpress.com/city-d...p-and-tracker/
https://x.com/City_Duo/status/1833231199734796623
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #712  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 8:00 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant/Downtown South
Posts: 7,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
This project seems to have found a way to meet the requirements for social housing, and 23.3 FSR seems like plenty of density.
Whatever it takes to get development going in the dtes. The Local area plan doesn’t allow that kind of density (as far as I know).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #713  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 8:13 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,312
Where's Ken Sim's promised efficiency in getting these things approved? Fire up that rubber stamp.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #714  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2024, 8:55 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Not enough staff to rubber stamp probably.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #715  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2024, 3:24 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant/Downtown South
Posts: 7,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
I wonder what the thinking is on these 50 foot lots that would allow 6 units, yet the application only asks for 4 units. I would have thought you would geta better return with 6 units, even if they would be smaller - 6 x 938 sq ft each vs 4 x 1400sq ft each, average size. (Lot size 50x112.5)

Last edited by logan5; Sep 10, 2024 at 3:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #716  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2024, 3:58 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
I wonder what the thinking is on these 50 foot lots that would allow 6 units, yet the application only asks for 4 units. I would have thought you would geta better return with 6 units, even if they would be smaller - 6 x 938 sq ft each vs 4 x 1400sq ft each, average size. (Lot size 50x112.5)
I guess there's some situations where the additional units would require you to make 2-room units etc.

https://www.dclarkearchitect.com/pos...tial-inclusive
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #717  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 2:46 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Townline/Boniface Oleksiuk Politano



Quote:
282 W 49th Ave (Langara YMCA) rezoning application

Musqueam Capital Corporation, the economic development arm of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam Indian Band), in partnership with YMCA BC and Townline, seeks to rezone the site to a new CD-1 district. This will permit a mixed-use development that offers a diverse range of housing options and new community facilities. It will also provide a unique opportunity to secure long-term economic prosperity and self-sufficiency for the Musqueam people. This initiative aims not only to generate economic growth but also to empower the Musqueam people through ownership and active participation in Vancouver’s economic fabric.

The proposal is for a mixed-use development with three buildings at heights of 8, 33, and 37 storeys that includes:

Community service focused replacement YMCA facility with associated childcare;
308 rental units, 269 strata units, and 88 social housing units;
Commercial space on the ground floor;
A total floor area of 53,928 sq. m (580,472 sq. ft.); and
A maximum building height of approximately 122 m (400 ft.).
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/282-w-49th-ave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #718  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 5:27 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 703
A bit disappointing that there isn't a pool included in the YMCA space. This area, and South Vancouver generally, is really lacking in aquatics space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #719  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 6:33 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
A bit disappointing that there isn't a pool included in the YMCA space. This area, and South Vancouver generally, is really lacking in aquatics space.
Wasn't it in the initial proposal?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #720  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2024, 6:47 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Wasn't it in the initial proposal?
Yes there was a 25-metre lane pool in the 2019 proposal



https://www.urbanyvr.com/new-langara-ymca-details/

Closest thing I guess will be the new outdoor pool at the Marpole Community Centre

https://vancouver.ca/parks-recreatio...e-renewal.aspx

Last edited by jollyburger; Sep 11, 2024 at 6:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.