HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:48 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Yes, but no. The Federal funding contribution for the Ontario, Eglinton, Younge North and Scarborough lines is $10.4 bn, so they aren't paying up as much for some more expensive projects. On the other hand the $3.4bn Hamilton LRT they're covering 50%, with the province the other half.

You'd have to create a spreadsheet of Federal funding on transit over time by Province to see how 'fair' any allocations have been.

Obviously we don't have an existing network of non-electric trains to electrify like GO, so some expenditure is going to be legitimately more, where the goal is carbon reduction and lower cost operations.
we definitely get the short end of the stick. from direct funding, to equalization. youd have to include all of our payments to the east in equalization, as a negative to federal funding to the west. even if they stopped stealing out money to send east, we would be able to afford more infrastructure.

but not only do they steal from us, they also deny us the same level of funding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:34 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
we definitely get the short end of the stick. from direct funding, to equalization. youd have to include all of our payments to the east in equalization, as a negative to federal funding to the west. even if they stopped stealing out money to send east, we would be able to afford more infrastructure.

but not only do they steal from us, they also deny us the same level of funding.
Equalization is an entirely different financial program to federal funding for transportation, so it's hardly relevant to a thread about trasit to the North Shore. You do know that BC doesn't make any actual payments for equalization, and that Ontario barely receives any money under equalization? "Provincial governments make no contributions to the Equalization program. All Canadians are subject to the same federal income tax system and its progressive rate structure, regardless of where they live."
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Today, 12:09 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Equalization is an entirely different financial program to federal funding for transportation, so it's hardly relevant to a thread about trasit to the North Shore. You do know that BC doesn't make any actual payments for equalization, and that Ontario barely receives any money under equalization? "Provincial governments make no contributions to the Equalization program. All Canadians are subject to the same federal income tax system and its progressive rate structure, regardless of where they live."
...You do realize that when all provinces are subject to the same federal tax system, and some provinces get equalization payments but BC does not, that literally does mean that BC dollars are being funnelled towards have-not provinces for equalization payments, right? That's called the fungibility of money.

Not making a judgement on the morality of it all, but denying basic facts just breeds discontent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Today, 1:12 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
...You do realize that when all provinces are subject to the same federal tax system, and some provinces get equalization payments but BC does not, that literally does mean that BC dollars are being funnelled towards have-not provinces for equalization payments, right? That's called the fungibility of money.

Not making a judgement on the morality of it all, but denying basic facts just breeds discontent.
Almost everybody pays federal taxes, either income tax or GST. Since 1957 Canada has had a system where some provinces are given some of the federal funds that go into general revenue, and others don't receive anything.

No money is paid by the BC government, or withheld from them, and there is no cheque or direct debit to the federal government to help other provinces, which seems to be how the system was being characterized.

Federal funds allocated for transit are entirely a different story, and I really have no idea whether the larger provinces in the east get more than their fair share, based on population. Certainly larger urban areas which can justify a rail transit system qualify for funds that others don't, but that doesn't seem to be a 'hard done by west' story. Halifax is only a bit smaller than Hamilton, but it's not getting transit funds any time soon.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Today, 2:00 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,613
I, a British Columbian, pay a dollar to the federal government.

A New Brunswicker pays a dollar to the federal government.

The federal government gives New Brunswick 50c in equalization.

The federal government gives British Columbia nothing in equalization.

New Brunswick got 25c from me.

That should be fairly simple to understand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Today, 2:28 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
I, a British Columbian, pay a dollar to the federal government.

A New Brunswicker pays a dollar to the federal government.

The federal government gives New Brunswick 50c in equalization.

The federal government gives British Columbia nothing in equalization.

New Brunswick got 25c from me.

That should be fairly simple to understand.
That has nothing to do with federal transit funding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Today, 2:57 AM
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 9,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
I, a British Columbian, pay a dollar to the federal government.

A New Brunswicker pays a dollar to the federal government.

The federal government gives New Brunswick 50c in equalization.

The federal government gives British Columbia nothing in equalization.

New Brunswick got 25c from me.

That should be fairly simple to understand.
It more like you give 25c in tax to the feds. Someone in New Brunswick gives 25c. Shell Canada (and other corporations) gives 25c Various other importing things into the country of living outside of Canada give another 12c. Federal government generates another 12c from other places.

Out of those one dollar, 22c is given out as equalisation. Given only about half of the federal revenue is from personal income tax good luck trying its being taken from people in one region to give to people in another region.

Getting back to transit. Generally its allocated based on population and is used to match projects proposed by the provincial government.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Today, 4:58 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
That has nothing to do with federal transit funding.
No, but it does affect provincial transit funding when BC does not get any equalization payments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Today, 5:52 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
....even if they stopped stealing out money to send east, we would be able to afford more infrastructure.

but not only do they steal from us, they also deny us the same level of funding.
You really, really don't understand what "stealing" means.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Today, 6:24 AM
BaddieB BaddieB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 196
Chowhou, I think based on our other conversation about development fees, is that some people aren't very good at conceptualizing tax burdens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Today, 6:56 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,616
If anything, it's the territories getting robbed by equalization. Despite paying the same taxes, and being the most underdeveloped part of Canada which would greatly benefit from additional funding, AFAIK they get Nunavut.

Here's the part I don't get though: if Quebec's got the second-highest GDP and higher average wages than Ontario (and only slightly-lower GDP/capita), how come they need 58% of the payments?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:20 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.