HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2841  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 2:00 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Who wants that? Why not at Phibbs, Maplewood, CapU, etc? There are so many places available on the NS for housing. Why make affordable housing in one of the most expensive pieces of property in NV?
Why not? This is one of the best, most livable transit areas in the metro and half an hour away from downtown - if anything, there should be more below-market housing at Lower Lonsdale, just as there will be for Broadway. Healthy neighbourhoods have a mix of all income levels. Why exile all the have-nots to Maplewood?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2842  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 2:03 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The Feds were unable to sell the Sinclair Centre, and entered into partnerships on Jericho and the former RCMP headquarters in Vancouver. The province passed their Jericho land to the first nations. The former warehouse of the Liquor Distribution Board is now a first nations asset. I'm fairly sure that no significant federal or Provincial property assets have been sold off to private sector developers in the recent past without either a financial settlement with first nations, or their involvement in the development.
On top of that, the province is thinking about amending the Land Act to let the FN have joint custody of Crown properties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2843  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 2:23 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Lower Lonsdale has a lot of junk rental stock so it probably is as diverse income wise as anywhere else in Metro or in comparison to Coal Harbour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2844  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 2:59 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
I imagine any sale of what is now a provincial site might prompt a land claim by North Shore first Nations.
I was also thinking this, especially as the press release states the development is being done in partnership with MST.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2845  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 3:05 AM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Why not? This is one of the best, most livable transit areas in the metro and half an hour away from downtown - if anything, there should be more below-market housing at Lower Lonsdale, just as there will be for Broadway. Healthy neighbourhoods have a mix of all income levels. Why exile all the have-nots to Maplewood?
Because you could probably do triple that amount of homes for the same price at Maplewood
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2846  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 3:10 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The Feds were unable to sell the Sinclair Centre, and entered into partnerships on Jericho and the former RCMP headquarters in Vancouver. The province passed their Jericho land to the first nations. The former warehouse of the Liquor Distribution Board is now a first nations asset. I'm fairly sure that no significant federal or Provincial property assets have been sold off to private sector developers in the recent past without either a financial settlement with first nations, or their involvement in the development.
Federal lands are an entirely different can of worms I don't want to get into, but you should know better. The LDB lands and Jericho lands were sold at arms length to the MST nations, with the added price of extinguishing their other land claims. I don't think anyone here would be protesting a similar sale here, especially given the MST nations' genuine drive to build housing in this city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2847  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 3:14 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Who wants that? Why not at Phibbs, Maplewood, CapU, etc? There are so many places available on the NS for housing. Why make affordable housing in one of the most expensive pieces of property in NV?
Calling it "one of the most expensive pieces of property in NV" is an absolute farce.

Land values are in line with any other property in Lower or Central Lonsdale, even Maplewood or Lynn Creek are the same for that matter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2848  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 3:31 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Because you could probably do triple that amount of homes for the same price at Maplewood
More like not even double. And then none of those will be next to the SeaBus or SkyTrain.

And there's nothing stopping the province from building a mix of market and below-market, if anybody's worried about value for their tax money; they bought at 47% off and have no obligation to turn a profit. A private developer, on the other hand...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2849  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 4:38 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Because you could probably do triple that amount of homes for the same price at Maplewood
It's okay the province has unlimited amounts of money to build these projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2850  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 6:18 AM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Calling it "one of the most expensive pieces of property in NV" is an absolute farce.

Land values are in line with any other property in Lower or Central Lonsdale, even Maplewood or Lynn Creek are the same for that matter.
You must not know which property we are discussing here.

Name another piece of property worth 100 million in NV.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2851  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 7:02 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
You must not know which property we are discussing here.

Name another piece of property worth 100 million in NV.
Absolute value is irrelevant, the site it over three acres of course it is worth more than the average property with an apartment building on 1/5 the land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2852  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 8:14 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
(clears throat)

Quote:
Construction on a $100-million condominium development in North Vancouver is officially underway.

Green on Queensbury is made up of three, four-storey buildings with a total of 164 units, including apartment condos, garden homes and two-level townhomes ranging in size from 517 to 1,546 sq ft. The project is already 80 per cent sold.

The development is located adjacent to Moodyville Park, which is on a hillside between Low Level Road and East 3rd Street.
Moodyville Park's not even in Lonsdale - it's halfway to Phibbs. Real estate got expensive, my person.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2853  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 4:19 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Absolute value is irrelevant, the site it over three acres of course it is worth more than the average property with an apartment building on 1/5 the land.
The canadian tire site is assessed at 52M and is 8.5 acres

Stongs is assessed at 78M and is 5 acres

Innovation Campus is 44M and 6.5M

that big area beside the Innovation campus 39 acres and 65M

Where the post office is: 1.3 acres and 15M

Rona, 3 acres and 28M
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2854  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2024, 8:41 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
Multiple citations needed. 120 Charles Street's been assessed at $5.6m, roughly $18-19 million/acre; ICBC was assessed at $29.41 million/acre. That's 1.6x cheaper at best - nowhere near triple.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2855  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2024, 5:46 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
I don't get the big stink over the Provincial government buying some land from a crown corp at a discount. Sure, it may smell funny and sure seems like legislative capture of a supposedly independent board, but when you really think about it this means $50M of public housing development costs that would have been paid through income taxes will instead be paid through automobile insurance. This one-time event is very different from regularly raiding contingency funds or other cash reserves by demanding cash dividends be paid to the government.

And yes, I understand drivers may be upset if a portion of their premiums benefit non-drivers. But our tax system takes money from one user group to benefit another all the time, so this is nothing radical.
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2856  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2024, 5:49 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight View Post
I don't get the big stink over the Provincial government buying some land from a crown corp at a discount. Sure, it may smell funny and sure seems like legislative capture of a supposedly independent board, but when you really think about it this means $50M of public housing development costs that would have been paid through income taxes will instead be paid through automobile insurance. This one-time event is very different from regularly raiding contingency funds or other cash reserves by demanding cash dividends be paid to the government.

And yes, I understand drivers may be upset if a portion of their premiums benefit non-drivers. But our tax system takes money from one user group to benefit another all the time, so this is nothing radical.
It's okay when it happens to you that's karma.

Maybe they can throw some magic ICBC money at the sewage plant while they are at it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2857  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2024, 6:30 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
It's okay when it happens to you that's karma.

Maybe they can throw some magic ICBC money at the sewage plant while they are at it.
Exactly! I pay my income taxes but can count my annual uses of a toilet on the North Shore on my fingers. So why should I, as a proud south of the inlet shitter be subsidizing those North Shore crappers? Besides, the District and West Vancouver taxpayers on average earn much more than the rest of us so why should us poors be financing their gold-lined pipes?

I think if BiV did a proper analysis with a Venn diagram of who pays taxes in BC (income, VAT, etc.) and who pays into ICBC, they would find the populations are almost identical. And at that point, is it really worth getting mad because the money I pay once per year to insure my car or renew my license is funding social housing instead of the money I pay bi-weekly from my paycheque?

But if BiV really wants to incite rage, they should write some articles about how the rich retiree who owns five luxury cars that all have their own licenses and insurance policies but are driven a dozen times collectively per year is really floating the rest of us who make do with one car for a family of four or who may not own a car but pay ICBC to renew our licenses and to collectively insure Evo's fleet.
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2858  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2024, 6:52 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight View Post
Exactly! I pay my income taxes but can count my annual uses of a toilet on the North Shore on my fingers. So why should I, as a proud south of the inlet shitter be subsidizing those North Shore crappers? Besides, the District and West Vancouver taxpayers on average earn much more than the rest of us so why should us poors be financing their gold-lined pipes?
Bad example, you help pay for the North Shore sewage treatment plant because North Shore taxpayers are going to help you pay for your Iona sewage treatment plant project which is coming down the pipeline (pun intended?).

I highly doubt that social housing residents are going to pay drivers back for funding their government subsidized housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2859  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 5:47 PM
griswold griswold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 83
Sleeping gondolas at new Grouse base station

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2860  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 5:53 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by griswold View Post
Sleeping gondolas at new Grouse base station
Hope they wake up in time for winter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.