HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7681  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 2:37 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,900
It was always supposed to be a longterm stay hotel, not like a normal residential building. I'm surprised that they were able to push the one tower taller.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7682  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 2:46 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unbending View Post
I wonder why they veered away from a glass tower. The other three towers are predominantly glass, giving TNS a cohesive look. Is it a cost savings measure?
Kinda kills the vibe of that corner honestly. It would have looked way better as a cohesive development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7683  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:03 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,292
i like adding some brick/stone it looks like, makes it unique from the others
__________________
just an ordinary Prairie Boy who loves to be in the loop on what is going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7684  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:17 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,864
I like the varied facade elements of the new tower as opposed to the all glass of the other TNS towers. I am disappointed that there wont be two towers though. I really liked the density all the new high-rises in the general area.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7685  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:19 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,864
...also, I guess that south tower pad will always be there (like 300 Main).

Winnipeg sure likes it's undeveloped pre-constructed pad sites.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7686  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:20 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,013
I don't think TN has anything to do with this. They sold the property to northlands. I liked the two tower design better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7687  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:25 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,900
I am guessing that there is still foundation capacity to support a second tower, seems pretty foolhardy to spend that kind of cash to not use the foundation, but yet again, this is Winnipeg: Home of the "future building/development site" phase 2 (in 50 years)...
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7688  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:28 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
...also, I guess that south tower pad will always be there (like 300 Main).

Winnipeg sure likes it's undeveloped pre-constructed pad sites.
So what happens with that? Could something be built there in the future? Sorry for my ignorance haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7689  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:37 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,237
they should partner with paragon for the south pad!
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7690  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:42 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
they should partner with paragon for the south pad!
They could teach Northland a thing or two on getting things built in a timely fashion haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7691  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 4:31 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,013
Where was that rendering posted? Was there a variance number or anything like that?

I noticed a large group of people standing around on Hargrave earlier this morning. not sure what exactly they were doing. Thought maybe there was an announcement of some kind. Then saw the render posted. Maybe just coincidence.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7692  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 4:39 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,864
I think I would have preferred the tower to be on the south pad as opposed to the north pad. It would fill up the block a little more and give the Wawanesa building a little room to breathe.

I would expect the reasoning being that the original north tower was the taller of the two proposed buildings, thus making it easier for it to be the taller, single tower.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7693  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 5:59 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
It was always supposed to be a longterm stay hotel, not like a normal residential building. I'm surprised that they were able to push the one tower taller.
Yeah me too. I wonder what kind of structural/geotechnical gymnastics they needed to do for this to work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7694  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 7:03 PM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,923
It seems as if they’ve cancelled the other tower? Or maybe added one floor to the hotel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
It was always supposed to be a longterm stay hotel, not like a normal residential building. I'm surprised that they were able to push the one tower taller.
Did they though? It’s either the same size or, apparently, 1 floor taller Than originally envisioned

Was supposedly a 27 storey and a 17 storey tower originally

So from 44 storeys of development it’s now downsized to possibly just 28?

Here is what previous sources said:
https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg...wers-1.2791001

https://winnipegsun.com/2016/02/24/p...quare-revealed

And the older renders for fun comparison (front page links are dead for me so)
https://www.economicdevelopmentwinni...e-north-square

Edit: unless it got downsized from the initial reveal and has now be re-upsized?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7695  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 8:11 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
They could teach Northland a thing or two on getting things built in a timely fashion haha.
if you blink long enough you might miss a paragon project being completed start to finish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7696  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 8:36 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,668
Brutal, what a waste of space to leave half the site flat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7697  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:39 PM
primetimey primetimey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 4
Mid-July and no action happening on site. This hotel is not getting built anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7698  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:54 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by primetimey View Post
Mid-July and no action happening on site. This hotel is not getting built anytime soon.
I was about to ask.
Unfortunately, The answer you gave was what I have come to expect.
Maybe its time to write this off and get someone else to build it?
Northland seems to not care, no penalties either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7699  
Old Posted Yesterday, 11:07 PM
zalf zalf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 690
There are workmen visible in the mornings, and an excavator showed up there in the last couple days. I agree it seems like only a token effort. When Wawanesa was going up, it had dozens of workers on site from 06:00 sharp, six days a week and seven days per week during the final sprint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.