HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5561  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 6:29 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,139
... Meh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5562  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 6:49 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,058
the lack of connection between the station and the remnants of the mall are still problematic. At least an at grade covered arcade should connect the mall with the station.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5563  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 11:49 AM
BaddieB BaddieB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 513
Im happy the Urban Park made it in, but I wish there was more pedestrian only places.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5564  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 2:45 PM
CondoInvestor CondoInvestor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 137
Brentwood copycat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5565  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:00 PM
VantageHD's Avatar
VantageHD VantageHD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexus View Post
2024, May 29

BCIT

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Lake City Way, this thing is HUGE

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX, on Flickr
I drove past this a couple days ago. Had no idea what it was, but man was it massive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5566  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 5:22 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaddieB View Post
Im happy the Urban Park made it in, but I wish there was more pedestrian only places.
What is this? An urban park for ants? The park has to be at least… three times bigger than this!
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5567  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 4:46 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Revisions for possible hotel usage in the podium for Metro King

Quote:
A rezoning application has been received in order to permit the addition of hotel use within the commercial floor area of the development previously approved under REZ #19-64. The proposed change also includes a minor revision to the setbacks of the commercial podium to allow for the addition of windows on the western facade. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with information on the proposal and to
recommend that the Rezoning Bylaw be brought forward for First and Second Reading
at a future date of Council.
https://pub-burnaby.escribemeetings....cumentId=76528

Third reading for Phase 1 of the Willingdon Lands also was at council this week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5568  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2024, 11:06 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Revisions for possible hotel usage in the podium for Metro King

https://pub-burnaby.escribemeetings....cumentId=76528

Third reading for Phase 1 of the Willingdon Lands also was at council this week.
I think this is the current west elevation.
Allowing windows on the west side of the podium would prevent the development to the west from continuing a street wall along Kingsway,
unless the podium is cut back significantly from the lot line.


https://en.youlive.ca/burnaby-presale/533-citizen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5569  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:11 AM
BaddieB BaddieB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 513
City reverses plan to spend $6M for expanded Burnaby elementary school gym

Quote:
When asked about the reversal, the city said the provincial government's recently introduced housing legislation have reduced the city’s ability to fund growth-related services and infrastructure through its community benefit bonus policy.
I hate Burnaby council so much. They have the ability to fund it, but are choosing to play political games with school funding. Shameful.

https://www.burnabynow.com/local-new...ol-gym-9119310
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5570  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:42 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,087
People: "We should build more housing."

Burnaby: "But we haven't spent enough on infrastructure!"

BC: "Too bad, build it anyway."

Burnaby: "Somehow there's even less money for infrastructure now!"

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5571  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:51 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaddieB View Post
City reverses plan to spend $6M for expanded Burnaby elementary school gym

I hate Burnaby council so much. They have the ability to fund it, but are choosing to play political games with school funding. Shameful.

https://www.burnabynow.com/local-new...ol-gym-9119310
It's a bit surprising Burnaby were contemplating giving money to a school project. Most municipalities point to the province's sole responsibility for education funding, and leave it to them to fund (or fail to fund) the School Board's programs. They co-operate on planning new school locations with the School Board, but in Burnaby they leave it to the Ministry of Education and Child Care to secure the sites.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5572  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 1:55 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
People: "We should build more housing."

Burnaby: "But we haven't spent enough on infrastructure!"

BC: "Too bad, build it anyway."

Burnaby: "Somehow there's even less money for infrastructure now! Developers cough up more cash"

Developers: "You build it"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5573  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 2:26 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
There's some infill projects by OpenForm Properties. The first one sort of has some interesting architectural elements. Kingsway/Greenford by the Newell Substation

Quote:
A 41-storey tower makes a striking architectural impression with a mesmerizing pattern of horizontal and vertical design elements. The collection of homes will feature impeccable interiors designed for both function and beauty, along with stunning views of the North Shore Mountains and Fraser Valley. The progressive nature of the building extends into a variety of forward amenities that will complement modern-day living. The tower is centrally located amongst shops, restaurants, and services only steps away, and the animated energy of Metrotown is close. Accessibility to transit and nature, such as the Highland Park Line Trail, elevates the lifestyle experience even more and will be a bold statement in living.
2nd one seems like Silver Avenue near Maywood Park with all those other new high rises

Quote:
Located across from a beautiful neighbourhood park in Burnaby, the project engages the park with an urban edge of townhouses and views overlooking the greenery from the second-floor amenity spaces.
A collection of design-forward apartments are contained within a striking tower, incorporating strong vertical and horizontal architectural elements to accentuate its design.

Landscaping echoes the neighbouring park with a rich mixture of active and contemplative areas of refuge. Residents arrive through a stunning porte cochère, designed for convenient pick-ups and drop-offs, and continue into a grand double-height lobby. Spacious interiors are beautifully finished with timeless and high-quality details chosen for enduring quality.

Residents will savour views across the city and to the mountains from generously sized outdoor spaces. This central location is only steps from shops, services, entertainment, and the Metrotown SkyTrain station byway.
https://www.openformproperties.ca/live
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5574  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 5:08 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
There's some infill projects by OpenForm Properties. The first one sort of has some interesting architectural elements. Kingsway/Greenford by the Newell Substation

https://www.openformproperties.ca/live
Yeah looking at the image it must be where Honda is now. I was slightly surprised they were proposing a 41 storey tower there until I looked at the plans Burnaby has now - they have Kingsway marked as "High Street Mixed Use Corridor." I suspect they won't be able to make it strictly residential and will have to include a retail podium.

Edit: Google maps shows a rezoning sign and on the Major Developments page it's REZ 18-43

Quote:
IBI Group Architects - 6958/84 Kingsway, 7243 Greenford Ave, 6957/61 Beresford Street
To permit a mixed-use dvlpmt with a commercial podium and townhouses at grade, with a residential tower above

Strata: 346
Mkt Rental: 52
Non-mkt rental: 17
Townhouses: 11

Third Reading 2022.06.20
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5575  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 5:33 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,446
It looks like the two 'Golden Towers' on Kingsway (Capital Point, the former GVRD office and it's smaller sister) will be back in play. Slate Asset Management (of Toronto) have been unable to pay back $48.9 million of the $88.3 million loan made to them in 2019 to buy the properties.

New York-based lenders are the U.S. Life Insurance Company and the American Home Assurance Company, and they've petitioned for a receiver appointed to sell the buildings after RBC Capital Markets Group and Cushman & Wakefield ULC and later Jones Lang LaSalle failed to find a buyer since they were first offered for sale last July.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5576  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 6:10 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
More details here

Quote:
At the Burnaby properties, there was one interested potential buyer, but it wanted to extend due diligence to spring 2025. Ultimately, Slate has been unable to sell the properties.

The petitioners in the claim are New York-based lenders, the U.S. Life Insurance Company and the American Home Assurance Company, that make commercial loans. According to the claim, the lenders have lost faith in the ability of the Slate companies to achieve a sale and seek a receiver appointed to run a sales process.

As of June 20, 2024, the outstanding amount under the loan to be paid back to the N.Y.-based lenders was $48.9 million, according to the claim. Other material creditors named in the claim include the City of Burnaby, which is owed $817,479 in taxes that will fall into arrears if not paid by July 3, 2024.

On Tuesday, Slate’s Office REIT announced it has received notices of default for its revolving credit facility and expects to go into default on upcoming interest payments for three debentures.
https://vancouversun.com/news/metrot...0-million-loan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5577  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 6:14 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,434
But the office market is strong, strong I tell you!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5578  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 6:42 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
But the office market is strong, strong I tell you!
The owners were planning on converting one tower to residential. Older, tired and peripherally located buildings will be more difficult to lease.

Overall the office market is still the strongest in Canada. "The Canadian office market reported 439,000 sq. ft. positive net absorption to start off the year. This is the first quarter of positive net absorption since Q3 2022 and was bolstered by pre-leased new supply in Vancouver, offsetting further softness in Toronto." [CBRE]
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5579  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 8:12 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The owners were planning on converting one tower to residential. Older, tired and peripherally located buildings will be more difficult to lease.

Overall the office market is still the strongest in Canada. "The Canadian office market reported 439,000 sq. ft. positive net absorption to start off the year. This is the first quarter of positive net absorption since Q3 2022 and was bolstered by pre-leased new supply in Vancouver, offsetting further softness in Toronto." [CBRE]
Yup, they were planning on not just converting that tower facing Kathleen Ave to residential, but demolishing it outright to construct a whole new tall residential tower. Sadly that didn't pan out. I suppose they were facing a financial crunch by then and had to sell the entire property to pay off their debt.

It is amazing to see that some of the lots around this property have towers that are almost completed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5580  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 8:36 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,955
The longer they wait, the taller a redevelopment will probably go!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.