Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysb
Possibly but I feel like they shit down 300 Columbus before rates went crazy
|
Durst was probably being a bit too conservative regarding the 300 Columbus project. But even if they've been not completely forthright or a bit shady, I'd also agree that this clearly is just the macroeconomic environment the
world is in for at least a couple more years. In my view, it's not a bad thing for the city to take a bit of a breather development-wise with larger projects while there's still a lot of uncertainty regarding the next stage of the economy.
There's also thousands more multi-family units coming still-to-come online later this year in other parts of the Philly. It's better for the fundamentals to show that the higher-than-historical-average number of units are still being absorbed to keep vacancy rates in-check. The last thing Philly needs is headlines showing rising apartment vacancy rates and some type of narrative twisting that information, causing developers to shy away completely.
Right now, Philly is actually at a nice equilibrium with rents rising only a few % year-over-year, and units being absorbed at a respectable rate (from what I've seen in recent reports). It's not like NYC, Boston and Chicago, which are seeing unsustainable rent spikes due to crazy shortages, or conversely many of the Sun Belt hubs, that are seeing big supply gluts and decreasing rents. And that's a good thing.