Quote:
Originally Posted by Siriusb
This was found on the city web site. If this the case, it's the worst option. Housing on this property, and the property behind it, should be paramount. Wake up city hall!
![](https://www.xfer316.com/55/irving1.jpg)
|
I agree. This property is perfect for housing, along with the property behind it. I don't understand what good it'd do keeping it. It creates a very large dead zone, which is a shame.
I get historical preservation as I very much agree with preserving history, but the old Irving building is not deserving of preservation.