HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #301  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 12:34 AM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #302  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 3:04 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,454
Can someone submit a Choir of Angels singing Hallelujah to go with that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #303  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 5:07 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,426
For the record these are 2 buildings with 100% market strata units. Where's the affordable housing component?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #304  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 5:35 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
For the record these are 2 buildings with 100% market strata units. Where's the affordable housing component?
The first non-market building was completed in 2015. A second should have been completed, (and it looks close to completion) and the rest was supposed to be delivered by the end of the year, (although that's not going to happen). A third building was approved last year.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #305  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 5:52 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
For the record these are 2 buildings with 100% market strata units. Where's the affordable housing component?
Holborn has moved around the locations of the social housing a bit since the site plan was approved, but I'm pretty sure 5155 Main Street is still social housing (I think it's got Occupancy by now).

Seniors social housing building was completed in 2022, I think? I think they've built a total of about 160 units so far so only 74 more to go? Last building I think is still located in Phase 4. Could be 2 more buildings for those 74 units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #306  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 5:56 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,017
Ah for 137 East 37th I forgot it is only the temp. mod. housing still
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #307  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 6:12 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,017
5198 James St looks to be the 1st project of Phase 2 to go ahead with 5299 Main St (located in Phase 1) swapping locations with social housing, which will now be in Phase 2 (137 East 37th). As I understand it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #308  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 8:28 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,293
By our count there's

Phase 1
3 social housing applications (one includes a daycare), 1 strata application (plus its resubmission).

Phase 2
1 social housing application, 2 strata applications.

Phase 4
1 social housing application.

That comes to a total of 331 strata homes, 282 social housing apartments, and a 69 space daycare. The only development permits that have been issued are for the three social housing proposals in Phase 1, one of which includes the daycare .

As per our tracker
https://cityduo.wordpress.com/2015-d...ogress-report/

Last edited by Feathered Friend; Jan 25, 2024 at 8:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #309  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2024, 10:33 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,293
Social Housing Permitting Progress


https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/137-e-37th-ave-2


https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/4902-james-st


https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=202513406

Quote:
A building permit has been approved for 70 long overdue social housing apartments at Little Mountain. Only a lone 49 home development permit remains to be issued, with the rest of these 282 affordable homes either approved, completed, or under construction.

Some may say this proves David Eby, &/or ABC Vancouver have taken the right approach in mitigating this long running, tragic planning failure. Others may argue they’ll believe it when the last home is finished. As for us, we’re just presenting this information so others can weigh in.
https://x.com/City_Duo/status/1775288107505758519?s=20
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #310  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2024, 12:33 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
Well, they are being quite honest with the size of the windows - no camouflaging with spandrel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #311  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2024, 12:09 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,964
Groundbreaking this morning:

Affordable rental development underway in Vancouver’s Little Mountain neighbourhood
https://globalnews.ca/news/10450514/...neighbourhood/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #312  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 11:17 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,454
Just so y'all know, Joo Kim Tiah feels really bad about how long it has taken. not bad enough to give an explanation, but bad.

....The lot has sat empty since 2009 since the existing social housing there was purchased by Holborn Properties Ltd. and demolished. The move displaced nearly 700 people.

Holborn was originally required to replace those units but claimed it failed to get financing. Vancouver city council last year voted to nullify the requirement.

Joo Kim Tiah, CEO of Holborn, says he feels bad about the whole situation.

“If it makes it any better, I would apologize about how it’s taken so long. It was never the intention. It’s a very long backstory about why it’s taken so long, but I don’t think we need to go there. What we can do is just focus on moving ahead as quickly as possible,” he said....


https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2024/0...g-constructio/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #313  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 9:09 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 1,854
How can one person be so full of s*** and still be designated a human?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #314  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2024, 7:09 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is online now
Blazed Member - Citygater
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,154
a new crane is up on the site .....

yet the current building "under construction" he been under construction for what ..... 4 or 5 years now?

also can we get a thread retitle ..... as this is U/C now
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #315  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2024, 6:29 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,060
^Will do when I'm back in town and can acsess the site on something other than a touchscreen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #316  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 6:37 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,803
Done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #317  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 7:46 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,454
It's laughable that Holborn is incompetent enough to have owned this land for so long and missed not one but two real estate bubbles. Two perfect opportunities to easily move units in this project. Now they're going to launch in a time of high construction costs and tapped out buyers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #318  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 8:55 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
I also hate that their incompetence was a "convincing" reason for this council to vote to allow them to build condos before the required social housing. Home values have basically doubled since they were essentially given the land, and they were complaining that they were being hard done by and won't be able to make the project work without additional assistance? Give me a break.

I'm glad this is finally being built, but I hate that they got even more handouts than the already unreasonable ones they had, simply for sitting on their asses and not replacing the homes they were required to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #319  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 9:02 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusmcduff View Post
I also hate that their incompetence was a "convincing" reason for this council to vote to allow them to build condos before the required social housing. Home values have basically doubled since they were essentially given the land, and they were complaining that they were being hard done by and won't be able to make the project work without additional assistance? Give me a break.

I'm glad this is finally being built, but I hate that they got even more handouts than the already unreasonable ones they had, simply for sitting on their asses and not replacing the homes they were required to.
It was an extremely bad deal on the part of the BC Liberals. Unbelievable they made it. Imagine if BC Housing owned that land now and could have been building thousands of affordable rentals on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #320  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2024, 11:44 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,368
this who development has been insane. so much special treatment, handouts, etc. and theyre just the absolute worst.

they should have been forced to forfeit the land a long time ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.