Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor
Yes, let's bulldoze the city and start over again! (and again, and again, and again)
I'm sure we'll get it all right this time because someone bought a hockey team and nobody will buy his tickets unless we build him some new sports bars.
4th time's the charm!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Palace_%28arena%29
|
What a disingenuous comment lmao
Do you want to have a serious discussion or are you just going to be snarky here?
This isn't the fourth try lmao
The very first Salt Palace wasn't even on this site - it was over on 900 South between Main and State. It burned down in 1910 and wasn't rebuilt.
The first Salt Palace arena was built in 1969 as a multi-purpose sports arena that housed the Salt Lake Golden Eagles and then the Utah Jazz from 1979 to 1991.
The Delta Center was then built because the Salt Palace was not only outdated, it was one of the smallest arenas in the NBA. It wasn't workable anymore at its size and if the Delta Center had never been built, the Jazz would have relocated.
The convention center was then built on the site of the arena.
I guess my question to you: what are you even suggesting here? That they should have never demolished the original Salt Palace? What the hell was Salt Lake going to do with an outdated, tiny arena when they already had the newer Delta Center and the larger Huntsman Center on the U's campus?
Honest question: if the Salt Palace can be renovated so that it's not such a dead zone, why would that be a bad thing?
You just seem to want Salt Lake to remain stagnant?